User talk:5.152.72.140

.

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 21:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Colchis. Please read WP:Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Favonian (talk) 11:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Mushki has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Austronesier (talk) 15:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Colchis and other pages

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 00:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing--Diauehi and other pages

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Skeptical1800 (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Second block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing. Look, IP, that template has been there for years, so there is an expectation for you to secure the consensus in order to remove it. The article talk page is the venue in which to undertake that. Hope this makes sense. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 07:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Achaemenid Empire. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Third block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for disruptive editing yet again. This time, edit warring a 19th Century map over a 20th Century one with claims that the latter is "fake." You fail to substantiate sufficiently such an WP:EXTRAORDINARY claim, you do not use article talk pages as instructed to do on multiple occasions. Note that a future block will be considerably longer (closer to a year than 6 months). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 13:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timurid invasions of Georgia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Noorullah (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at List of wars involving Georgia (country), you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at List of wars involving Georgia (country), you may be blocked from editing."

Who are you trying to deceive with your nationalist brain? Sources cited in Diauehi Most of the sources on Armenian, Iranian or Hurrian languages are fake or unreliable, some of them do not say what they were written in these languages, and the rest are just unreliable publications. Also for a neutral opinion and Wikipedia rules there should be sources from several different origins, for example the claim that they speak Armenian is verified by 3 Armenian sources and violates Wikipedia rules. Also they are fake sources. 2. The source about the Iranian language is fake and also violates Wikipedia's rules because such claims require multiple sources. 3. About the Khuritian language, 1 source is fake, where it is indicated that Melikishvili claims this, the rest of the sources are unreliable publications that no one knows. But the page is blocked by nationalists like you, who write a thousand nationalist tales on Wikipedia. 5.152.72.140 (talk) 00:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should read up the meaning of "fake". Say hello to ANI in a sec! HistoryofIran (talk) 00:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need to read. By fake, I mean that in the added book it is not written anywhere that they speak Armenian in Diauehi, etc. There are several such sources in Armenian and Hurrian. 5.152.72.140 (talk) 00:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to Talk:List of wars involving Georgia (country). Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ham tech person 00:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked for six momths from editing for contravening Wikipedia's policy against harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 04:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.