User talk:48f

Welcome!

Hello, 48f, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Romans in Sub-Saharan Africa you included material copied from the Simple Wiki. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Muslim conquest of the Maghreb. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 17:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being a troll like this is not going to win you support. Engage on the talk page. R Prazeres (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WOW....now even offenses... I have read that you like to fight continuously.....ADIEU--48f (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I have read that you like to fight continuously". Where have you read that? R Prazeres (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm CurryTime7-24. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Romans in sub-Saharan Africa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The source you provided, a personal blog, is unacceptable according to WP:UGC. If you can find a reliable source that confirms your claim, please do add it to the article. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 15:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Romans in sub-Saharan Africa. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Romans in sub-Saharan Africa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BUSCAPLEITO, I think you are the one who likes "edit war"! You erase maps and references well done & accepted without problems in other wikipedias.... PERO YO NO QUIERO PLEITOS CON UNO COMO TU!!! --48f (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:48f reported by User:CurryTime7-24 (Result: ). Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 20:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]