Jump to content

User talk:46.31.118.91

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Israel Weapon Industries—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, how is it non-constructive? Please explain. 46.31.118.91 (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Sweden–NATO relations are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is not a free speech platform, see WP:FREESPEECH. You are free to stand on your street corner and criticize Sweden all you wish; you aren't entitled to force a private organization to publish your thoughts. 331dot (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My street corner is here on Wikipedia, in case you failed to notice. I will publish whatever needs to be said especially when your private organization supports terrorism in the guise of free speech. If you had any conscience you would address my argument, but you failing to do so and attacking me instead is enough proof of your intelligence or lack thereof. Take a hike pal! 46.31.118.91 (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a general debate forum; you will be blocked if you further use talk pages inappropriately. 331dot (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would not expect anything less from someone who cannot debate in a civil manner. I'm not debating with you. Please stop bothering me and do your job. You're probably paid for it. So much for the "free" online encyclopedia. 46.31.118.91 (talk) 05:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 12:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

@Girth Summit: this sock admits using multiple IPs. Also vandalized many pages today. Maybe just give a perma ban, so he can't return here in a month?

I said I use a public computer with a shared IP address. I did not admit to a wrong doing. I merely stated my position and reason for the different IPs. Certainly not a sockpuppet. "Vandalized many pages"? Are you an ignoramus or just pretending to be one? 46.31.118.91 (talk) 07:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at allegation now, I can't stop laughing. That's not me. What, you can't tell my proper English from his/her broken English? Are you as incompetent as you look? 46.31.118.91 (talk) 07:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Saint Joseph shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nonsense. I asked the other editor how the current changes were now. 46.31.118.91 (talk) 06:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]