User talk:2A02:AB88:7805:CF00:304D:1B8D:6BE4:ADB7
December 2024
[edit]Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Keszthely without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't "remove content" I fixed an incorrect etymology with provided source 2A02:AB88:7805:CF00:304D:1B8D:6BE4:ADB7 (talk) 01:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- You did remove content; you deleted the sourced etymology that was already there. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:32, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- It was incorrect and biased 2A02:AB88:7805:CF00:304D:1B8D:6BE4:ADB7 (talk) 01:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- You need to provide some kind of evidence and reasoning for why that's the case, rather than just deleting it and asserting that the two high-quality existing sources were "incorrect and biased". These things are often best sorted out on the article talk page. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- What makes you think that my source is not "high-quality"? That edit was made by notorious anti-hungarian slovak nationalist on wikipedia, and you have no knowledge of authority on that topic 2A02:AB88:7805:CF00:304D:1B8D:6BE4:ADB7 (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Your source may very well be high quality, but no matter how high quality it is, it is incapable of making the other two sources magically cease to exist. Deleting them was inappropriate. If you think there is reason to believe there is something wrong with these sources, I suggest starting a discussion on the talk page. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- What makes you think that my source is not "high-quality"? That edit was made by notorious anti-hungarian slovak nationalist on wikipedia, and you have no knowledge of authority on that topic 2A02:AB88:7805:CF00:304D:1B8D:6BE4:ADB7 (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- You need to provide some kind of evidence and reasoning for why that's the case, rather than just deleting it and asserting that the two high-quality existing sources were "incorrect and biased". These things are often best sorted out on the article talk page. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- It was incorrect and biased 2A02:AB88:7805:CF00:304D:1B8D:6BE4:ADB7 (talk) 01:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- You did remove content; you deleted the sourced etymology that was already there. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:32, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at János Volner, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:16, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |