User talk:211.30.150.155

Attention:

This IP address, 211.30.150.155, is registered to OPTUS INTERNET - RETAIL. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

December 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:31, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

211.30.150.155 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My prior unblock request was arbitrarily deleted by an associate of the guy who's instigated a storm in a tea cup. Could an admin or moderator please examine this issue, and the fact our written request of appeal was hidden before any mediator could examine our grounds? Surely that isn't allowed? Further our IP gateway is banned from even posting on pages to request admin or moderator review and assistance in what is clearly turning into a guy madly back pedaling realizing he over reacted and went a bit power mad. As a wikipedian since it first started and as one of the older persons who use this gateway I am utterly disgusted to see this kind of behavior and truly hope this isn't the norm these days. Can SOMEONE please intervene and stop this nonsense? Addendum: Please examine our View History to see our grounds for appeal that were deleted before it could be reviewed properly. 123.98.130.3 (talk) 11:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests may not be placed by others. For your information, a very simple review of the edits by this IP address (including referring to others as "asshat" is perfect reasoning to remove those comments from a page owned by the Wikimedia Foundation (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

211.30.150.155 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am the owner and admin of the gateway in question, however our gateway has been blocked in a manner that we cannot appeal the block or post here or on any admin pages to try and seek resolution to this matter. Regarding my earlier unblock request, I was not debating the removal of content, I was requesting some sense be injected into this situation where a building has been banned because a user decided to claim he felt harassed. My first appeal was deleted by them, before an admin had a chance to read it, and I fear the earlier review wasn't exactly carried out thoroughly given that the only comment was on an edit note (?!) and nothing in relation to being banned for 'attempting to harass' someone who it's clear the OP of those comments doesn't know and doesn't care to know. It's a bit beauricratic that we're all stuck because someone got offended indirectly.

Decline reason:

This IP address has been used for significant amounts of unconstructive editing, and it is blocked to prevent continuation. It may be "beauricratic" [sic], but unfortunately the alternative, namely leaving IP addresses with histories of disruption open, would rapidly destroy Wikipedia, so we have to do it. It is also worth mentioning that the request would have been declined anyway, as it did not come from this IP address. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.