Jump to content

User talk:209.150.119.98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

October 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jen Adams, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pat Tillman with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 18:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pat Tillman, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 18:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Pat Tillman. Epbr123 (talk) 18:21, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Roger Federer, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

November 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aspartame, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aspartame. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Aspartame with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Calabe1992 14:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Intentionally bumping up against 3RR without crossing it, repeatedly, is considered Gaming the System and will be treated much the same as if you'd broken the rule anyway. King Öomie 15:14, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Backup, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

December 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Microprocessor, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. West.andrew.g (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Processing (programming language), you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Input, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ageism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ageism was changed by 209.150.119.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956643 on 2012-02-24T13:53:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:53, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Louis XIV of France, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Louis XIV of France. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. You continued to do this two more times after the warning above. Voceditenore (talk) 12:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Hello, I'm Mark91. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Prince Edward Island, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mark91it's my world 18:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to How to Train Your Dragon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Firearm. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Yintan²  14:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Firearm. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jonathanfu (talk) 14:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tom was changed by 209.150.119.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96059 on 2013-04-12T14:04:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:04, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Munchkin Country. Yintan²  14:04, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to AK-47. Jonathanfu (talk) 14:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Rainbow Loom has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Hello, I'm Auric. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of reportedly haunted locations in the United States, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Auric talk 14:10, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gone may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Gone (2011 film)|''Gone'' (2011 film)]], a show featuring [[Moppy pipe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gone (novel series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2015

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Evacuations of civilians in Britain during World War II has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 172.58.40.79. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anti-Mexican sentiment have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 172.58.40.79 (talk) 18:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pkbwcgs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joseph Serchuk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Fungie—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 18:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Esperanza Rising seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Cjse23. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Edmund Andros have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Cjse23 (talk) 19:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of the Connecticut Constitution. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Novo Tape. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Elizabeth George Speare have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 19:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:209.150.119.98&oldid=1194817787"