User talk:202.166.70.149

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

10:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
PrimeBOT (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

March 2020

Hello, I'm Denver20. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Y.E.S. 93.3FM have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Denver| Thank you (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Radio Station articles format

Hi there, I noted you have a keen interest in Singapore's Radio Stations. I wonder are you related to the radio station industry? Also I like to refer you to Wikiproject Radio Station suggested style for Radio Station Articles which suggested You may add properly sourced, encyclopedic content describing a station's programming, but a simple list of a station's on-air staff should not be added. To a reader who isn't already familiar with the station, a plain airstaff list doesn't do anything to help them understand or get a feel for the topic. Describing a station's programming gives the reader a much better sense of the station, its personalities and its on-air style than a meaningless list of people they've never heard of. This means a list of DJs, current and former should not be added as they do not give much information about the topic. With this, I like to suggest a compromise of trimming the article to list the current DJs and the segments which they are hosting. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Love 97.2FM, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Ed6767 (talk) 20:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Read more

Learn more why your edit was removed here: WP:NOTDIR Ed6767 (talk) 20:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Love 97.2FM. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 06:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a directory.

Stay safe, EditQwerty (talk) 07:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia is not a directory

Wikipedia encompasses many lists of links to articles within Wikipedia that are used for internal organization or to describe a notable subject. In that sense, Wikipedia functions as an index or directory of its own content. However, Wikipedia is not a directory of everything in the universe that exists or has existed. Please see Wikipedia:Alternative outlets for alternatives. Wikipedia articles are not:

1. Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as (but not limited to) quotations, aphorisms, or persons (real or fictional). If you want to enter lists of quotations, put them into our sister project Wikiquote. Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are relevant because they are associated with or significantly contribute to the list topic. Wikipedia also includes reference tables and tabular information for quick reference. Merged groups of small articles based on a core topic are permitted. (See Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists § Appropriate topics for lists for clarification.)
2. Genealogical entries. Family histories should be presented only where appropriate to support the reader's understanding of a notable topic.
3. The white or yellow pages. Contact information such as phone numbers, fax numbers and e-mail addresses is not encyclopedic. Likewise, disambiguation pages (such as John Smith) are not intended to be complete listings of every person named John Smith—just the notable ones.
4. Directories, directory entries, electronic program guides, or resources for conducting business. For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable. Likewise an article on a business should not contain a list of all the company's patent filings. Furthermore, the Talk pages associated with an article are for talking about the article, not for conducting the business of the topic of the article.
5. Sales catalogues. An article should not include product pricing or availability information unless there is an independent source and a justified reason for the mention. Encyclopedic significance may be indicated if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on these details instead of just passing mention. Prices and product availability can vary widely from place to place and over time. Wikipedia is not a price comparison service to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices and availability of a single product from different vendors or retailers.
6. Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories such as these are not considered a sufficient basis for creating an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon. See also Wikipedia:Overcategorization for this issue in categories.
7. Simple listings without context information. Examples include, but are not limited to: listings of business alliances, clients, competitors, employees (except CEOs, supervisory directors and similar top functionaries), equipment, estates, offices, store locations, products and services, sponsors, subdivisions and tourist attractions. Information about relevant single entries with encyclopedic information should be added as sourced prose. Lists of creative works in a wider context are permitted.

Unblock the account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

202.166.70.149 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think the block shld not be the case as I am doing edits of most Singapore based pages as i do know what is the present sitiuation of what it shld be like. All my information are all general only and I dont think that I am involving with any other restrictions of wikipedia. I am doing my part to improve the page. If you do not believe pls feel free to check past contributions and check for official sources that related to every edits made respectively so you know what I mean. Also, the contributions made are all singapore based if you were to see carefully. Pls look into it and understand my intentions in a correct way but not the opposite. Thanks!

Decline reason:

You seem confused. It is your responsibility, not ours, to find and provide the sources. Additionally, your unblock request is almost incoherent, so I worry you lack sufficient command of English to edit here. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2020

Hello, I'm Robertsky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, YES 933, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. eh... you just got off a block for adding unsourced materials... – robertsky (talk) 00:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Love 97.2FM, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not update the infoboxes of the various constituencies. It lists the MPs not the candidates for the election. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 04:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

East Coast GRC

Hello. It's not my intent to delete contributions by users.

Nevertheless, it's still evident that your insistence on inserting every single appointment of the leaders makes the sentence extremely unwieldy to read - it's also grammatically incorrect and not relevant to the text. I cite ST to give an example that it's not necessary to list down every single appointment of the personalities involved, especially when most of them hold secondary appointments.

I am requesting to self revert your own edit until you can come up with a correct sentence structure for the information you wish to include, or cite an article from established sources that does list down every appointment. Failing which, we should take the matter to the Talk page and request the input of other editors.

You have not responded to my concerns that the sentence is structurally wrong, and awkward to read, nor the necessity to include secondary appointments (Minister in PMO is not an appointment), but simply reinstated the text you had inserted a few weeks ago, while I have shown compromise and inserted back additional information I had removed. Please do respond to my concerns.

Unable to sign on mobile. Seloloving. Seloloving (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Marine Parade Group Representation Constituency, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 16:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at West Coast Group Representation Constituency. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your command of the English language suggests the English version of Wikipedia is not suitable for you. Please stop making disruptive edits. Equine-man (talk) 17:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kawasaki Heavy Industries & Nippon Sharyo C751B, you may be blocked from editing. Equine-man (talk) 19:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marsiling–Yew Tee Group Representation Constituency. Equine-man (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Concerns on your editing

Hello IP user.

Ang Mo Kio GRC

I reverted your revert of my edit on Ang Mo Kio GRC. I removed the second link to the People's Action Party as it's already linked in the first part of the paragraph. In accordance with Wikipedia's policy of duplicate linking, it's unnecessary. Secondly, in accordance with the manual of style, we don't add Mr/Ms/Mrs in front of person's names. We seemed to be engaged in a slowmo edit conflict over these matters and I do encourage you to read Wikipedia's Manual of Style before continuing your edits. Should that not work, we should seek dispute resolution. As you have racked up your vandalism warnings from another prior user (which I generally disagree with), I do not wish to report you to the Administrator's Noticeboard as I do wish to encourage you to continue editing. Please do respond to me here. Seloloving (talk) 23:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Aljunied GRC

I have also just reverted your edit on Aljunied GRC as the sentence is structurally wrong. "Aljunied GRC present days heads by Pritam Singh" is nearly incoherent. You can render the sentence as:

Presently, Aljunied GRC is headed by Pritam Singh...

In the present day, Aljunied GRC is headed by Pritam Singh...

Aljunied GRC is headed by Pritam Singh in the present day...

I would not revert your edits if they are grammatically correct with proper sentence structure, as they are part of improving Wikipedia. This is not an edit war or harassment. Seloloving (talk) 00:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Looking at the edits, I have to agree. Seloloving's English is correct, yours was not. If English is not your native language, you may have more luck contributing in your native language version of Wikipedia. If you continue to make blantantly grammatically incorrect edits you will be blocked from editing. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 01:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@CaptainEek: Hi, IP editor back to persistent insistence on his version and reverted my fixes. I request your assistance to block IP. Thanks. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 06:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

MaterialScientist had blocked and reverted the latest round. Thanks. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of a page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Hi, I noticed your remarks at a talk page. As per the above section, we seek to contribute constructively to Wikipedia together. If there is any content dispute, please discuss in the page's talkpage Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Aljunied Group Representation Constituency, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 06:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021

Hello, I'm Seloloving. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Marine Parade Group Representation Constituency, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 08:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. jp×g 02:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Appointments

Hello IP, I note that you have an account User talk:Bringyouaway and are editing logged out. Nevertheless, you have been trying to add all the appointments to the ministers in the GRC pages since last year. Please understand that this clutters up the content and makes the sentence near unreadable. Your lack of sufficient English competency from last year remains.

You continue to add unsourced material and have failed to respond to concerns, continually re-adding them under the pretext that the 'information is correct.' and justifying that the same information on other pages exists. You have failed to provide sources despite numerous reminders, and unsourced material can be removed at any time without warning.

You are also ignoring feedback and refusing to engage in dialogue and compromise on the issues. Per Wikipedia:Competence is required, you are failing the criteria to have: "the ability to read and write English well enough to avoid introducing incomprehensible text into articles and to communicate effectively." While I have done my best to give you feedback and edit your English for the last few months, this situation is not acceptable any longer. Without your intention to improve on your communication and editing skills, I will be recommending for an administrator's attention in the near future. Seloloving (talk) 00:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

---