User talk:1timeuse75

Dead Meat Explanation

Long story short i put the wrong name. i put "dead meat" instead of "dead meat youtube channel" on my first draft and i didn't know how to change it. so if @Bonadea can recheck my page for an article that would be great. this was a just a misunderstanding and i was totally my fault.apologies

first time editor, 1timeuse75 1timeuse75 (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Fair enough - Wikipedia has a lot of weird customs and practices, and it takes a while to learn how it works. Please do not blank the other draft, since it was created by a different editor; the existence of Draft:Dead Meat won't affect your new draft (which is clearly much better than the old one, at this point). Happy editing! --bonadea contributions talk 16:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dead Meat (YouTube Channel) has been accepted

Dead Meat (YouTube Channel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 22:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The thumbnail of Plagiarism and You(Tube).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The thumbnail of Plagiarism and You(Tube).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sock (tock talk) 18:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

my apologies @Sock. Can you give me more details and why this isn't fair use, so I don't make the same mistake again?

Cheers 1timeuse75 (talk) 19:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

No apology needed, we've all been there! WP:FAIRUSE (and specifically WP:NFCI) covers it in detail, but that page is pretty beefy so I'll summarize my reasoning for this case. The big thing with fair use images is that they have to be either irreplaceable or provide extra insight that can't be described in text.

For example, if you upload an image that's the only usable visual identifier of something, like a movie poster or album cover, that's covered. If you upload something like a screenshot from a movie or game, you need to also include context for why that image is a necessity and can't be described in text.

The image you added would 100% be fair use if the article was specifically about Plagiarism and You(Tube), but since it's just about Hbomberguy and hasn't been critically dissected, its inclusion doesn't really do anything for the reader other than be a nice visual.

Tried to keep the babbling to a minimum, but I hope that makes sense! Feel free to fire off any questions as well and I'll help/clarify as best I can. Sock (tock talk) 19:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sock hey man, thanks for been so nice, i forget that "Wikipedians" are very nice. i have just have one more question

1a) in the third paragraph you basically say that you can't have media (thumbnail/poster) about anything relating to the article like Hbomberguy can't have Plagiarism and You(Tube) because the article isn't about Plagiarism and You(Tube) . off the top of my head i can think of two examples of this, that i want clarified. Once in a Lifetime (Talking Heads song) have a section about the music video with a photo. the image is showing that "In the music video, David Byrne dances erratically over footage of religious rituals, dressed in a suit, bowtie and glasses." and not just the thumbnail so i was wondering if maybe a still from Plagiarism and You(Tube) can be add? (like the part where Brewis show James scrip with all plagiarized stuff coloured)

1b) Ghostwatch which is in short is a British mockumentary horror film. near the end of the article there's a part about the making of ghostwatch, Ghostwatch: Behind the Curtains. but the article is about the original film? the only real difference is really the infobox which i don't think matters (maybe it dose i don't know).

anyway thanks thanks for helping, Cheers 1timeuse75 (talk) 06:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Article about a suspect in the death of Natalie McNally

Hi 1timeuse75, You recently created an article about a suspect who is facing murder charges in the suspicious death of Natalie McNally. Until such time as there is a conviction for murder, Wikipedia cannot say that a murder occurred beyond reasonable doubt. Please read the guidelines WP:BLPCRIME, WP:CRIME and WP:BLPPRIVACY before adding to this article. I have proposed that the article be moved to the title "Death of Natalie McNally". You are welcome to join the discussion. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)