Jump to content

User talk:194.83.70.241

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grizzly bear, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mathonius (talk) 09:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shrimp. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Shrimp was changed by 194.83.70.241 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891184 on 2012-05-05T09:22:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bootham School, you may be blocked from editing. Mathonius (talk) 09:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grizzly bear, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pinethicket (talk) 09:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Death by burning, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

September 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2012

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samaritans (charity), you may be blocked from editing. Dental plan (Lisa needs braces) 09:39, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Shrimp, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Shrimp was changed by 194.83.70.241 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963871 on 2012-10-10T09:41:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mars (mythology), you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 12:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mars (mythology). O.Koslowski (talk) 12:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dionysus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Haploidavey (talk) 12:11, 17 November 2012 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. I've struck through this warning, as the edit to Dionysus seems good faith. Subsequent non-constructive edits to other articles, however, made after the final warning above this, justify blocking per policy. Haploidavey (talk) 18:11, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 12:30, 17 November 2012

March 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Terrorism in the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at La Tomatina. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

January 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to St Mary's Abbey, York because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chupa Chups. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 14:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fountains Abbey, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Fountains Abbey was changed by 194.83.70.241 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855219 on 2014-01-10T14:19:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Emissions trading has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ben Williams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Ed Cotter. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Optakeover(Talk) 10:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ugog Nizdast. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bishops' Wars because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dogs in warfare. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 11:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Miles-Kingston, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Paul Miles-Kingston was changed by 194.83.70.241 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851704 on 2014-02-08T09:46:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Summer solstice— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Circus Maximus

[edit]

I've reverted the substitution of Pliny's unreliable estimate (250,000) for the revised (modern) estimates of the Circus' seating capacity; please check any reliable cited sources before making such changes to article content. In general, numbers used in ancient primary sources tend towards wild overestimation; they are not to be trusted, and if they are used, should not take precedence over those used in reliable sources and modern scholarship. The Humphrey source is very reliable. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Teardown (video game)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mento has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mento was changed by 194.83.70.241 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8938 on 2020-12-04T10:36:00+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bonfires of Saint John, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 💜  melecie  talk - 10:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Janusz Korczak, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of Roman gladiator types—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Centurion—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t believe I’ve ever edited this page {{unblock| reason=Never edited this page}} 194.83.70.241 (talk) 19:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

194.83.70.241 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think somebody stole my ipad and edited the page - my edits are usually constructive

Decline reason:

Please follow the instructions at the top of the page. Yamla (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:194.83.70.241&oldid=1159511593"