User talk:192.94.109.1

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, NebrWesleyan.edu (192.94.109.1), is registered to Nebraska Wesleyan University and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

May 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Eugene V. Debs on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Bkwillwm 05:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please to not experiment by editing articles, as you did with Evil twin. Experimentation belongs in the sandbox. Thank you. Dar-Ape (talk) 00:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Claygate 23:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to National Basketball Association, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Irongargoyle 05:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Time management. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote 15:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Partial molar volume, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ShakingSpirit ^talk 06:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Mike McGavick on 00:09 7 dec 2006[1]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Mike McGavick, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Burzum 01:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Henderson, Nebraska, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Ginsengbomb 05:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tim McGraw. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Karanacs 16:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dick (insult). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote 20:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mucus, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mucus was changed by 192.94.109.1 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-28T02:16:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page 9/11 conspiracy theories worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 01:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Joker (comics) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. StaticGull Talk 12:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to History of women in the military.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 01:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Multicultural Education has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 18:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Think about it

Hi! I've seen that you have made several nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Just consider this: Many people spend lots of their time here, creating and improving articles for the public's use. Any time that you have the urge to vandalize or delete content, think of all the people that spend their time trying to improve and better the information on Wikipedia. If you feel that you must do something on Wikipedia, instead of vandalizing this information, think of expanding and making it better. Think of this the next time that you hit the Edit this Page button. See also Wikipedia:Avoid the word "vandal".

ṜedMarkViolinist^{Drop me a line} 17:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Stephen. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Wakari07 (talk) 02:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 12 Rounds (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 10:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 16:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 99.156.68.203 (talk) 01:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shelby, Nebraska, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ammodramus (talk) 21:52, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Osceola, Nebraska, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ammodramus (talk) 21:55, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Re your silly edits to the article Nap: Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Even if you revert your own edit (in this case only partially), you're still stealing time from volunteers who check recent edits. Please participate constructively. --Hordaland (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Nebraska Wesleyan University has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Beatrice, Nebraska, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ammodramus (talk) 23:32, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (192.94.109.1) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --Gnowor^T_C 07:11, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nebraska Wesleyan University has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/nebrwesleyantheater.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

April 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Duncan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 05:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pawnee City, Nebraska. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 06:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willard Sorority.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412 (Talk * C) 21:50, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, I'm Mojoworker. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Dalai Lama without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mojoworker (talk) 18:23, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013

Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Toilet paper, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Torreslfchero (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willard Sorority concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willard Sorority, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 11:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Your edits to July 27

Some of your edits on the page July 27 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 15:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of evolutionary history of life. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Zell Faze (talk) 20:43, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Horseless Headman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Infectious mononucleosis ‎ has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Horseless Headman (talk) 18:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Infectious mononucleosis. Horseless Headman (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nomination of Biblical Graffiti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biblical Graffiti, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zebraic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.