Jump to content

User talk:184.147.109.215

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2021

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Politics of Cuba. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. clpo13(talk) 19:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Politics of Cuba.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  clpo13(talk) 19:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Thank you for once again proving Wikipedia's "neutrality policy" is a lie 184.147.109.215 (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you should have heeded the warning. clpo13(talk) 19:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We go with what RS say. If you want to challenge wp:consensus you make a case at talk you do not wp:editwar.Slatersteven (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At this stage I think wp:spa and wp:nothere might be worth your time to read.Slatersteven (talk) 19:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RS is clearly just code for "websites that heed the US government line", as the previous revisions were sourced and yet Snoog rewrote them anyways, and then went so far as to try to cover up that there was any dispute about the new revision's neutrality 184.147.109.215 (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Read wp:rs and wp:rsp, not they are not "websites that heed the US government line" many are not even American.Slatersteven (talk) 19:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, they just happen to consist of corporate media and websites that push imperialist narratives 184.147.109.215 (talk) 19:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but those are the rules, either edit within them or you will get a longer block (and maybe also blocked from editing your talk page). Read our policies.Slatersteven (talk) 19:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Typical Wikipedians, they care more about their beloved policies and their LARPish procedures more than they care about the truth 184.147.109.215 (talk) 17:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:184.147.109.215&oldid=1060787960"