User talk:176.88.165.232

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 176.88.165.232, has made edits to the page Khwarazmian Empire which do not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not already been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you did not make this change, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. Logging in is not mandatory to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have!

Some other good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
The Teahouse – our help forum for new users

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hi 176.88.165.232! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Khwarazmian Empire several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Khwarazmian Empire, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

what you wrote here applies to you, not me. You have started the edit war, for your arbitrary verdicts and not explaining them either. --176.88.165.232 (talk) 15:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

He made personal attacks, not me: He accused me of DELIBERATELY MISUNDERSTANDING. Why do you threaten me when he slandered me?

Even more interesting is that when you had no answer to give, Remsense came and threatened me. Now, when I exposed that Remsense distorted the discussion by pointing out that he either failed to understand that we were talking of WP:RSOPINION not WP:RSP, unlike how he percieved or blatantly distorted, he has no answer to give but you come out and threaten me? :)

And, seeing as you are not rather inevitably hurtling towards a block, the best thing for you at this point would be reading this comment of yours, asking yourself "what is this comment about", and then issuing an immediate apology. Otherwise, well .. it's inevitable. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)~[reply]

He made personal attacks, not me: He accused me of DELIBERATELY MISUNDERSTANDING. Why do you threaten me when he slandered me?

Even more interesting is that when you had no answer to give, Remsense came and threatened me. Now, when I exposed that Remsense distorted the discussion by pointing out that he either failed to understand that we were talking of WP:RSOPINION not WP:RSP, unlike how he percieved or blatantly distorted, he has no answer to give but you come out and threaten me? :)

test

when I edit this page, my actual IP is shown but in others, another banned IP is shown --176.88.165.232 (talk) 06:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello 176.88.165.232! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Does this paraphrasement meet WP:RSOPINION?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khwarazmian Empire. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm MSLQr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:HistoryofIran have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MSLQr (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at Khwarazmian Empire.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 18:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.