Jump to content

User talk:176.150.245.115

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Madonna Litta. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (176.150.245.115) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Ifnord (talk) 15:09, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits and allegations on TM article

[edit]

Your are insisting on adding a single obvious to you point of view on the TM article. There are multiple controversies as the body of the article indicates. If you want to include the controversies in the lead you must include the most prominent and several not just one. Further do not suggest another editors edits are dishonest especially when that editor is attempting to hold on to the neutral balance of the article while respecting your edits as I have. I have looked at your other edits on other articles and POV editing will cause you problems. Please read Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Littleolive oil (talk) 22:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please join discussion on talk page rather than edit-warring further

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Transcendental Meditation ; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment and edit summary here:"I mean look at the article in other languages. Plus, I'm sorry if I seemed rude but if I did not go to talk page it's just because I don't know how to use WP properly. Really."
Two points to keep in mind: What goes on on other Wikipedias is not our concern here. And if you don't know how to go to a talk page to discuss you should hold off on editing content until you do.
To edit the TM talk page: In the left hand corner you will see a blue "Talk". Click on it. This will take you to the article talk page. Look for discussion on this topic in section headings. I will revert you and then you can bring your concerns to the talk page. There is an implied agreement to remove cult from the lead in part because it is in the body of the article with other controversies. Placing cult in the lead on its own creates an undue focus on one controversy. Second, the word itself carries emotional baggage that can better be dealt with by a more academically driven description which the article does in the body. You are attempting to add a WP:POV to the article. You have been warned so please join the discussion to state your position. Littleolive oil (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

[edit]

You once again are vandalizing the TM article by systematically removing and adding content with out credible reasoning. I have started to look at other articles you have edited and am now concerned you are dong the same to other articles. I suggest you stop unless you have legitimate concerns based on community standards for editing or I will have to ask for admin intervention. Littleolive oil (talk) 10:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Transcendental Meditation. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lupin VII (talk) 10:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Transcendental Meditation, you may be blocked from editing. It wasn't Olive Oil who reverted you. It was I, and it was done due to the fact that you continue to ignore any sort of consensus when making edits to the above linked page. Lupin VII (talk) 10:23, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
"I don't know how to use a talk page" Sure[1] you don't. My faith in your being here to contribute in a positve manner is rapidly fading. Stop now before you end up on WP:ANI. Lupin VII (talk) 10:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for CU/ sock puppet concerns

[edit]

I have requested a Check User sock puppet investigation here. Littleolive oil (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  N.J.A. | talk 12:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
The length of the block on this IP address has been increased. See the talk page of your account for further information. JBW (talk) Formerly known as JamesBWatson 22:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]