User talk:165.225.39.69

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

This IP address, 165.225.39.69, is registered to Zscaler and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome!

Hello, 165.225.39.69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quis separabit? 20:53, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RE Andrew McCabe

Thanks, anyway. Quis separabit? 20:53, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure to abide Template:Editnotices/Page/Andrew McCabe. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 21:01, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. . Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. The rule is: All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. WP:NPOV Rjensen (talk) 13:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC) I'm editing it to keep it neutral; if you're worried about nonconstructive vandalism, please take it up with the immature editor that keeps reverting them.[reply]

Read the rule--you are violating the rules including NPOV and 3-R rules. Notice has been given to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Rjensen (talk) 13:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly urge you to consider reading the rule first. The only people the page should be protected from should be editors like you and others who insist on violating NPOV.

please read the rule on biased sources: Wikipedia articles are required to present a neutral point of view. However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject. WP:BIASED Rjensen (talk) 13:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I strongly urge you to familiarize yourself with this rule you clearly haven't even read closely itself. The Newt information, in no way, presents his biography from a NPOV. I implore you to read it again, CLOSELY, before continuing to edit

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 16:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for unban

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

165.225.39.69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I merely trying to enforce the NPOV rules that are being clearly broken by other edit warriors. Hardly fair to solely ban me, when the original editor has been warring on the Gingrich article for well over a week now; he only didn't hit the 3RR rule because he spaces out his undo function over multiple days.

Decline reason:

Given that we just had to revoke your talk page access due to civility violations and personal attacks, your unblock request is declined and you'll be able to continue editing when the block expires. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Enforcing your view or any view of NPOV is not one of the exceptions to the 3 revert rule. ~ GB fan 15:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:165.225.39.69. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. see this edit ~ GB fan 15:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2019

Hello, I'm CaptainEek. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ammoniac, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} 20:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A. C. H.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Paisarepa (talk) 06:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A. C. H., you may be blocked from editing. Paisarepa (talk) 06:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.