User talk:110.44.124.166

February 2021

Hello, I'm Phuzion. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Singapore-Cambridge GCE Advanced Level—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Phuzion (talk) 07:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

NCCN

Hello. It seems you may be new here. Maybe not, though. Do not delete cited information again. There is no danger of the citations being fake news. In fact, no news was cited. Tags at the top mentioned that the sources were not independent. Non-independent sources are fine to add, they just don't prove notability. Wikipedia NOT NEWS does not apply here. *You* may take it to the talk page if you have issue with specific sources because you are the one who wants it changed from how it is now. I can't understand your edit comment. It isn't clear what you want. The article should probably be deleted, but we have to be fair to the people who want it kept by improving the article with what we find. If you do a wrong, change like that again, I will revert and bring attention to it in the deletion discussion that it is vandalism. Have a good day. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 09:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

I just saw that you left something on the talk page stating that the AfD is closed as delete when it isn't yet. If an admin notices what you are doing, you could end up getting blocked from editing. Please follow the rules. If you have questions, go to the teahouse. --DiamondRemley39 (talk) 14:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

---