Jump to content

User:SenatorSteve

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello! My name is Steven Quast! My friends call me "Senator". I am big into politics, rock and roll, comics, video games, history, social studies, geography, economics, Apple Computers, MSNBC, and getting my second BA at Central Michigan University in my hometown of Mt. Pleasant, MI. I am getting my teaching degree so I can teach History, Civics, Geography and Economics! Currently substitute teaching and may go back to my summer home island, Mackinac Island, where I will resume my pirate-like behavior! ARRRRRR!

More to come: Photos, colors, eye-catching material!

This user has been on Wikipedia for 16 years, 1 month and 19 days.

QThis user used to have access to Questia through The Wikipedia Library.

This user is a fan of English football.
This user drinks milk.
This user is an Apple zealot.
This user runs macOS.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
This user uses Wikipedia as a primary point of reference.
42YThis Wikipedian was born on 14 March 1982 and is 42 years, 9 months, and 11 days old.
This user is a bicyclist.
This user is interested in flags and emblems.
This user is a Jedi.
USage declineThis user uses American English, but is appalled at its rapid and continuing deterioration.


@This user can be reached by email.
its
it's
It's really not that hard to use each word in its proper manner.
your
you're
This user thinks that if your grammar is incorrect, then you're in need of help.
their
there
they're
This user thinks that there are too many people who don’t know that they're worse than their own children at spelling!
than
then
This user understands the difference between using "than" and "then."
to
too
two
This user thinks that too many people have no idea how to use words that they should have learned in grade two.
This user supports the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants.
This user is a university student.
This user enjoys comics.
This user reads DC Comics.
This user reads Marvel Comics.
This user knows
Magneto was right.
This user enjoys Star Trek.
This user is mourning the death of The Star-Spangled Avenger
d'oh!This user thinks The Simpsons is simply... excellent.
This user is a member of WikiProject Cleveland.
+This user likes getting friendly notices.
This user has been on Wikipedia for 16 years, 1 month and 24 days.
This user is Addicted to Wikipedia.
 刘晓波This user demanded the
unconditional release
of Liu Xiaobo (died 2017)
This user wants to be your friend.
This user lives in the
United States of America.
big wordsThis user opposes the use of esoteric, abstruse and recondite big words in Wikipedia articles when simple ones will do.
This user has visited 20 of the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.20
This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know.
This user is a participant in
WikiProject Death.
This user is a participant in the
Square Enix WikiProject
MacThis user contributes using a Macintosh computer.
User:Mandarax/UBX/Michigan
NOT BOTThis user is not a bot
This user is not an administrator.
dem This user supports the U.S. Democratic Party.
This user is a former member of the
Liberalism task force.
This user's time zone is UTC-5.
This user uses Google as a primary search engine.
This user believes in the use of semi-protection for all Biographies of living people.
UARThis editor believes that account creation should be required to edit on Wikipedia.
This user lives in the United States of America.
This user is owned by one or more cats.
Never mind the political views — the Duke is cool.
This user is owned by one or more dogs.
All in all this user is just another brick in the wall.
This user has a zero tolerance policy on vandalism.
This user supports recycling.
It is 10:49:13 on December 25, 2024, according to the server's time and date.
Minus Four Hours
This user is not a biological parent
This user believes that common sense trumps all other arguments.
This user is a member of WikiProject BBC.
G This user's favourite colour is Green.
This user is interested in history.
This user is a member of the U.S. Roads WikiProject.
This user has visited Florida.
This user is a participant in WikiProject Law.
This user is a participant in WikiProject Spam.
This user is a member of WikiProject Australian literature.
This user is a member of the Technology WikiProject.
This user is a participant in
WikiProject U.S. Presidents
This user contributes using Firefox.
This user is straight.
This user is a participant in
WikiProject Football.
500+This bot has made more than 500 contributions to Wikipedia.
This user is a Piscean.
This user lives on Terra.
♂This user is male.
DETThis user is a fan of the
Detroit Lions
This user loves
The Beatles.
This user enjoys playing Magic: The Gathering
This user supports recycling.
COMPLAINTS DEPARTMENT

Welcome to the complaints department! Please click the word [show] on the bar below that most closely represents your complaint: (This is NOT an original. I admired original creator's talents and adapted them to fit my own. Complete in homage and respect to the original. If only I remembered who is was...)

SenatorSteve is stalking me!

Possibly true. If you have engaged in seriously disruptive editing practices (vandalism, libel, etc.) recently, I may have taken notice and made a mental note to follow-up on some of your edits. This is common practice, and is even recommended by Wikipedia Policy in many circumstances. Please don't take it personally, as I have nothing against you; it's the disruptive editing that irks me. If you feel that my extra attention to your edits is unwarranted, I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you.

We also may crossing paths because we share an interest in some of the same subjects. If so, hello I am Senator Steve! Nice to meet you, let's be friends! Maybe we can both benefit through a sharing of information and ideas.

SenatorSteve is not assuming good faith!

You are right! As a general rule, I try to avoid making assumptions. WP:Assume good faith is a Wikipedia suggested guideline, not a policy; I've chosen to opt out of this one. I will still interact with proper civility and respect, as required, but be advised that I have left all assumptions about your intentions at the door where they belong. As taught to me by wikipedians of elevated standing and poor judgement when I first started editing here, [1][2][3], assuming bad faith is the norm. I will base my 'faith' on available evidence only.

SenatorSteve is edit warring!

You are mistaken. Please go back to the article in question and review the discussion page. You will find there a perfectly reasonable explanation of my edits. If you disagree with me for any reason, simply explain why on that same discussion page. If we both have the well-being of this Wikipedia project at heart, then we should be able to put any conflict easily to rest.

If our disagreement concerns your edits to a biography of a living person, you should be aware that I will not compromise on issues involving libel or sources.

SenatorSteve broke the Three Revert Rule!

Wrong. I never have and (barring some technical glich or lag) I never will.

SenatorSteve is canvassing!

If I have done so, it has been limited, transparent and in a neutral manner. You are allowed to do the same. More eyes on a discussion, and hence more voices contributing, will likely bring good results for all concerned.

SenatorSteve is being uncivil!

No, I am not. You have very likely misunderstood what I was trying to say. I will admit to coming off a bit snarky at times, and I have been known to misjudge the level of informality I can apply to a particular discussion -- but please understand that I meant no disrespect; I intended no ill-will. If you feel seriously slighted, drop a note on my talk page and I'll see if I can't muster up a sincere apology.

SenatorSteve is not editing from a neutral point of view!

You may need to explain in more detail here.

SenatorSteve thinks he owns an article!

As long as Wikipedia has a 'Watch Article' function, it may certainly appear this way. There are some tests you can run to determine if I own a particular article. (1) Try improving the article. If nothing happens, then you have found an article I definitely do not own. Conversely, (2) Try vandalizing the article. If I promptly revert your edits, then you have found an article I definitely do own.

My complaint about SenatorSteve is not listed above.

You may need to explain in more detail here.