User:Questforneutrality

Hello fellow editors, I am questforneutrality, and I am relatively new to Wikipedia editing. I have used Wikipedia in the past as a gateway to other great sources. I noticed along the way that some pages are extremely helpful in providing solid information and referencing while other are not.

This is an extension of two of my hobbies: getting to know the fundamentals of the evolving internet/WorldWideWeb, and researching topics of interest with the aim of objectivity.

User-generated web content, Wikipedia being a prime example, has been a fascination of mine since the beginning. Now, I can finally dedicate some of my time towards experiencing this process first-hand, learning, and contributing to the commons. I am excited.

I have noticed right away that respect on Wikipedia is important, and I like it. I will aim at always being respectful. Please give me the same courtesy.

Tip of the moment... Article quality assessments One of the most common methods used by WikiProject contributors to monitor and prioritize their work is that of assessing the articles within their scope. The de facto standard for these assessments is the Version 1.0 Editorial Team's assessment scale (shown below). FA  – The article has attained featured article status by passing an official review. A  – The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. GA  – The article has attained good article status by passing an official review. B  – The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. C  – The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. Start  – An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources. Stub  – A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category. For a basic overview of article assessment, please see the Assessment FAQ. Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip Read more: Article assessment-Ways to contribute   Become a Wikipedia tipster To add this auto-randomizing template to your user page, use {{totd-random}}