User:Phlsph7/Metaphysics - History
History
[edit]The history of metaphysics examines how the inquiry into the basic structure of reality has evolved in the course of history. Metaphysics has its origin in speculations about the nature and origin of the cosmos that go back to ancient civilizations.[1] In ancient India starting in the 7th century BCE, the Upanishads were written as religious and philosophical texts that examine how ultimate reality constitutes the ground of all being. They further explore the nature of the self and how it can reach liberation by understanding ultimate reality.[2] This period also saw the emergence of Buddhism in the 6th century BCE,[a] which denies the existence of an independent self and understands the world as a cyclic process.[4] At about the same time[b] in ancient China, the school of Daoism was formed and explored the natural order of the universe, known as Dao, and how it is characterized by the interplay of yin and yang as two correlated forces.[6]
In ancient Greece, metaphysics emerged in the 6th century BCE with the pre-Socratic philosophers, who gave rational explanations of the whole cosmos by examining the first principles from which everything arises.[7] Following them, Plato (427–347 BCE) formulated his theory of forms, which states that eternal forms or ideas possess the highest kind of reality while the material world is only an imperfect reflection of them.[8] Aristotle (384–322 BCE) accepted Plato's idea that there are universal forms but held that they cannot exist on their own but depend on matter. He also proposed a system of categories and developed a comprehensive framework of the natural world through his theory of the four causes.[9] Starting in the 4th century BCE, Hellenistic philosophy explored the rational order underlying the cosmos and the idea that it is made up of indivisible atoms.[10] Neoplatonism emerged towards the end of the ancient period in the 3rd century CE and introduced the idea of "the One" as a transcendent and ineffable entity that is the source of all of creation.[11]
Meanwhile in Indian Buddhism, the Madhyamaka school developed the idea that all phenomena are inherently empty without a permanent essence while the consciousness-only doctrine of the Yogācāra school stated that experienced objects are mere transformations of consciousness that do not reflect external reality.[12] The Hindu school of Samkhya philosophy[c] introduced a metaphysical dualism with pure consciousness and matter as its fundamental categories.[14] In China, the school of Xuanxue explored metaphysical problems such as the contrast between being and non-being.[15]
Medieval Western philosophy was strongly influenced by ancient Greek philosophy. Boethius (477–524 CE) attempted to harmonize Plato's and Aristotle's theories of universals by stating that universals can exist both in matter and in the mind. His theory inspired the philosophies of nominalism and conceptualism, as in the thought of Peter Abelard (1079–1142 CE).[16] Thomas Aquinas (1224–1274 CE) understood metaphysics as the discipline that investigates the different meanings of being, such as the contrast between substance and accident, and principles applying to all beings, such as the principle of identity.[17] William of Ockham (1285–1347 CE) proposed the methodological principles of Ockham's razor as a tool to decide between competing metaphysical theories.[18] Arabic–Persian philosophy, which had its prime period from the early 9th century CE to the late 12th century CE, employed many ideas of the ancient Greek philosophers to interpret and clarify the teachings of the Quran.[19] Avicenna (980–1037 CE) developed a comprehensive philosophical system that examined the contrast between existence and essence and distinguished between contingent and necessary existence.[20] Medieval India saw the emergence of the monist school of Advaita Vedanta in the 8th century CE, which holds that everything is one and that the idea of many entities existing independently is an illusion.[21] In China, Neo-Confucianism arose in the 9th century CE and explored the concept of li as the rational principle that is the ground of being and reflects the order of the universe.[22]
In the early modern period, René Descartes (1596–1650) developed a substance dualism according to which body and mind exist as independent entities that causally interact.[23] This idea was rejected by Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677), who formulated a monist philosophy according to which there is only one substance that has both physical and mental attributes developing side-by-side without interacting.[24] Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) introduced the concept of possible worlds and articulated a metaphysical system, known as monadology, that understands the universe as a collection of simple substances that are synchronized without causally interacting with one another.[25] Christian Wolff (1679–1754), conceptualized the scope of metaphysics by introducing the distinction between general and special metaphysics.[26] According to the idealism of George Berkeley (1685–1753), everything is mental, including material objects, which are ideas perceived by the mind.[27] David Hume (1711–1776) made various contributions to metaphysics, including the regularity theory of causation and the idea that there are no necessary connections between distinct entities. At the same time, his empiricist outlook led him to formulate a stark criticism of metaphysical theories that aim to arrive at ultimate principles inaccessible to sensory experience.[28] This skeptical outlook was embraced by Immanuel Kant (1724–1804). He tried to reconceptualize metaphysics as a critical inquiry into the basic principles and categories of thought and understanding rather than seeing it as an attempt to comprehend mind-independent reality.[29]
Many developments in the later modern period were shaped by Kant's philosophy. German idealists employed his idealistic outlook in their attempt to find a unifying principle as the foundation of all reality.[30] Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831) developed a comprehensive system of philosophy in which he examined how absolute spirit manifests itself.[31] He inspired the British idealism of Francis Herbert Bradley (1846–1924), who interpreted absolute spirit as the all-inclusive totality of being.[32] Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) was a strong critic of German idealism and articulated a different metaphysical vision that takes a blind and irrational will as the underlying principle of reality.[33] Pragmatists like C. S. Peirce (1839–1914) and John Dewey (1859–1952) conceived metaphysics as an observational science of the most general features of reality and experience.[34]
In the 20th century, Rudolf Carnap (1891–1970) and other logical positivists formulated a wide-ranging criticism of metaphysical statements by holding that they are meaningless since there is no way to verify them.[35] Another criticism of traditional metaphysics was articulated by ordinary language philosophers who identified misunderstandings of ordinary language as the source of many traditional metaphysical problems.[36] Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947) developed process metaphysics as an attempt to provide a holistic description of both the objective and the subjective worlds.[37] Logical atomists, like Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) and the early Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951), conceived the world as a multitude of atomic facts, which inspired later metaphysicians such as D. M. Armstrong (1926–2014).[38] Willard Van Orman Quine (1908–2000) tried to naturalize metaphysics by connecting it to the empirical sciences. His student David Lewis (1941–2001) employed the concept of possible worlds to formulate his modal realism.[39] In continental philosophy, Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) engaged in ontology through a phenomenological description of experience while his student Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) developed fundamental ontology as an attempt to clarify the meaning of being.[40] Heidegger's philosophy inspired general criticisms of metaphysics by postmodern thinkers like Jacques Derrida (1930–2004).[41]
Sources
[edit]- Taminiaux, Jacques (1991). Heidegger and the Project of Fundamental Ontology. State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-1-4384-2179-7.
- McLean, G. F. (2003). "Metaphysics". New Catholic Encyclopedia. Thompson/Gale Catholic University of America. ISBN 0-7876-4013-1.
- Gilje, Nils; Skirbekk, Gunnar (2017). A History of Western Thought: From Ancient Greece to the Twentieth Century. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-22604-6.
- Reynolds, Jack. "Derrida, Jacques". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Hylton, Peter (2007). Quine. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-92270-3.
- Oddie, Graham (2006). "Metaphysics". In Borchert, Donald M. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 6: Masaryk - Nussbaum (2 ed.). Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference. ISBN 0-02-865786-1.
- Mumford, Stephen, ed. (2003). "11. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism". Russell on Metaphysics: Selections from the Writings of Bertrand Russell. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-90272-7.
- Klement, Kevin (2019). "Russell's Logical Atomism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Proops, Ian (2022). "Wittgenstein's Logical Atomism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Palmer, Clare (1998). Environmental Ethics and Process Thinking. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-826952-6.
- Morris, Michael (2017). "Metaphysics, Philosophy, and the Philosophy of Language". In Hale, Bob; Wright, Crispin; Miller, Alexander (eds.). A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-97208-3.
- Hart, W. D. (1998). "Meaning and verification". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-X025-1. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Misak, Cheryl J. (2008). "Scientific Realism, Anti-Realism, and Empiricism". In Shook, John R.; Margolis, Joseph (eds.). A Companion to Pragmatism. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-5311-9.
- Janaway, Christopher (1999). "10. The Primacy of Will". Self and World in Schopenhauer's Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-825003-6.
- Green, Garrett (2008). "Modernity". In Jones, Gareth (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Modern Theology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-99733-8.
- Critchley, Simon (2001). Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-157832-8.
- Hettche, Matt; Dyck, Corey (2019). "Christian Wolff". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Svare, Helge (2006). Body and Practice in Kant. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4020-4118-1.
- Look, Brandon C. (2020). "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Dalal, Neil (2021). "Śaṅkara". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Lizzini, Olga (2021). "Ibn Sina's Metaphysics". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Adamson, Peter; Taylor, Richard C. (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-49469-5. Archived from the original on 7 June 2023. Retrieved 7 June 2023.
- Sweeney, E. (30 April 2016). Logic, Theology and Poetry in Boethius, Anselm, Abelard, and Alan of Lille: Words in the Absence of Things. Springer. ISBN 978-1-137-06373-1. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 17 June 2023.
- Marenbon, John (2009). "Introduction: Reading Boethius Whole". In Marenbon, John (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-82815-4.
- Robinet, Isabelle (2013). "Chongxuan". In Pregadio, Fabrizio (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Taoism: 2-volume set. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-79634-1.
- Chai, David (2020). Dao Companion to Xuanxue 玄學 (Neo-Daoism). Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-49228-1.
- Shun'ei, Tagawa (2014). Living Yogacara: An Introduction to Consciousness-Only Buddhism. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-86171-895-5.
- Depraz, Nathalie; Varela, Francisco J.; Vermersch, Pierre (2003). On Becoming Aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN 978-90-272-9683-2.
- Graham, Jacob N. "Ancient Greek Philosophy". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Grayling, A. C. (2019). The History of Philosophy. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-0-241-98086-6. Archived from the original on 3 July 2023. Retrieved 30 June 2023.
- Hamlyn, D. W. (2005). "metaphysics, history of". The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926479-7.
- Desmet, Ronald; Irvine, Andrew David (2022). "Alfred North Whitehead". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
- Hancock, Roger (2006). "Metaphysics, History of". In Borchert, Donald M. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 6: Masaryk - Nussbaum (2 ed.). Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference. ISBN 0-02-865786-1.
- Morris, William Edward; Brown, Charlotte R. (2023). "David Hume". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
- Berthrong, John H. "Neo-Confucian Philosophy". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
- Brown, Christopher M. "Thomas Aquinas". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
- Ruzsa, Ferenc. "Sankhya". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
- Dynes, Wayne R. (2016). "Creation of Daoism (6th Century BC)". In Curta, Florin; Holt, Andrew (eds.). Great Events in Religion: An Encyclopedia of Pivotal Events in Religious History [3 volumes]. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-61069-566-4.
- Littlejohn, Ronnie. "Daoist Philosophy". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
- Velez, Abraham. "Buddha". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
- Perrett, Roy W. (2016). An Introduction to Indian Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85356-9.
- Kirk, G. S. (30 September 2004). "Presocratics". In Rée, Jonathan; Urmson, J. O. (eds.). The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-33177-2. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- Dehsen, Christian von (13 September 2013). Philosophers and Religious Leaders. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-95102-3. Archived from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 28 May 2023.
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 183
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 590
- ^
- Perrett 2016, pp. 7–10
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- Andrea & Overfield 2015, pp. 70–71
- ^ Velez, § 1a. Dates
- ^
- Perrett 2016, pp. 7–10
- Velez, Lead Section, § 3. The Buddha's Cosmology and Metaphysics
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- ^
- Dynes 2016, p. 60
- Littlejohn, § 2. Classical Sources for Our Understanding of Daoism
- ^
- Littlejohn, § 5. Fundamental Concepts in the Daodejing
- Dynes 2016, pp. 60–61
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 183
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 590
- Kirk 2004, pp. 308–310
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 184–185
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 590
- Graham, § 3b. Metaphysics
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 185–187
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 590
- Graham, § 4a. Terminology, § 4f. Metaphysics
- ^
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 590
- Graham, § 5a. Epicureanism, § 5c. The Stoics
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 187–188
- Hamlyn 2005, pp. 590–591
- Graham, § 5. Post-Hellenistic Thought
- ^
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- Depraz, Varela & Vermersch 2003, p. 212
- Shun'ei 2014, pp. 5–6
- ^
- Ruzsa, Lead Section
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- ^
- Ruzsa, Lead Section
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- ^
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 188–189
- Grayling 2019, § Boethius, § Abelard
- Marenbon 2009, p. 6
- Sweeney 2016, pp. 10–11
- ^
- Brown, § 5. Metaphysics
- Hancock 2006, p. 189
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 190
- Grayling 2019, § Ockham
- ^
- Grayling 2019, Arabic–Persian Philosophy
- Adamson & Taylor 2004, pp. 1–3
- ^
- Grayling 2019, § Ibn Sina (Avicenna)
- Lizzini 2021, Lead Section, § 3. Essence and Existence, § 4. Modality and Existence
- ^
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- Perrett 2016, § The medieval period of Indian philosophy
- Dalal 2021, Lead Section, § 2.3 Two-Tiered Reality
- ^
- Smart 2008, pp. 70–71, 99–102
- EB staff 2017
- Berthrong, Lead Section, § 4. Traits, Themes and Motifs
- ^
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 591
- Dehsen 2013, p. 51
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 190
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 591
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 190–191
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 591
- Look 2020, § 4. Metaphysics: A Primer on Substance
- Menzel 2023, 1. Possible Worlds and Modal Logic
- ^
- Svare 2006, p. 15
- Hettche & Dyck 2019, § 5. Metaphysics
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 192
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 591
- ^
- Morris & Brown 2023, § 3. Philosophical Project, § 5. Causation, § 6. The Idea of Necessary Connection
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 591–592
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 192–193
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 592
- Wood 2009, p. 354
- Loux & Crisp 2017, pp. 1–2, 6
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 193
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 592
- Critchley 2001, p. 31
- ^
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 592
- Green 2008, p. 172
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 193
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 592
- Grayling 2019, § Idealism
- ^
- Grayling 2019, § Schopenhauer
- Janaway 1999, pp. 248–249
- ^
- ^
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 592
- Hart 1998, Lead Section
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 194–195
- Morris 2017, p. 15
- ^
- Desmet & Irvine 2022, § 6. Metaphysics
- Palmer 1998, p. 175
- ^
- Proops 2022, Lead Section
- Klement 2019, Lead Section
- Mumford 2003, p. 100
- ^
- Hylton 2007, p. 348
- Oddie 2006, p. 170
- Parent, § 2. Lewis' Realism
- ^
- Ryckman 2005, pp. 142–144
- McLean 2003, p. 550
- Taminiaux 1991, p. 154
- ^
- Gilje & Skirbekk 2017, Derrida, Foucault, and Rorty - Deconstruction and Critique
- Reynolds, Lead Section
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha>
tags or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
template or {{notelist}}
template (see the help page).