User:Paul Carpenter/Templates

{{User:Paul Carpenter/Focus}} gives:
[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]], this is just a suggestion, and there is nothing wrong with only editing articles on one topic, but I urge you to focus your energy away from editing articles on topics you are clearly so invested in. Your edits have been reverted several times, in accordance with Wikpedia's policies, and that is certain to continue. Edit warring may result in the loss of editing privileges, which you have already been warned about. But that doesn't mean constructive edits wont be welcomed. A good place to start might be topics near you. Once you are more practiced and familiar with core content policies then you may find it easier to edit the articles you feel strongly about in a more constructive manner.

{{User:Paul Carpenter/Focus|Hey there}} gives:
Hey there, this is just a suggestion, and there is nothing wrong with only editing articles on one topic, but I urge you to focus your energy away from editing articles on topics you are clearly so invested in. Your edits have been reverted several times, in accordance with Wikpedia's policies, and that is certain to continue. Edit warring may result in the loss of editing privileges, which you have already been warned about. But that doesn't mean constructive edits wont be welcomed. A good place to start might be topics near you. Once you are more practiced and familiar with core content policies then you may find it easier to edit the articles you feel strongly about in a more constructive manner.

{{User:Paul Carpenter/Blank2Delete}} gives:
It looks like you removed all or most of the content from an article. Blanking articles like that is almost never a good idea, but in this case I think it is likely that you did it in a well meaning attempt to delete the article. If your intention is to get an article deleted then take a look at our deletion processes instead. Removing a large amount of content generally looks like vandalism and will usually be reverted, which has happened in this case, so please avoid it in future. Thanks.

{{User:Paul Carpenter/Blank2Delete|The Void}} gives:
It looks like you removed all or most of the content from The Void. Blanking articles like that is almost never a good idea, but in this case I think it is likely that you did it in a well meaning attempt to delete the article. If your intention is to get an article deleted then take a look at our deletion processes instead. Removing a large amount of content generally looks like vandalism and will usually be reverted, which has happened in this case, so please avoid it in future. Thanks.

{{WP:TWICE}} gives:

This relies too heavily on primary sources, there should be at least twice as many secondary as primary sources. Without enough secondary sources it is not possible to establish notability or neutrality.