Jump to content

User:Oshwah/TalkPageArchives/2021-05

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


You are currently viewing an archive of Oshwah's user talk page from May 2021. Please do not modify this page.

These discussions are no longer active and were moved here for historical and record-keeping purposes. If you need to respond to a discussion from here, please create a new discussion on my user talk page and with a link to the archived discussion here so I can easily follow, and we'll be able to pick up where we left off no problem.


Were you trying to send me a message? No worries. Just click here to go the correct page.




Criteria of speedy cookies

DFW FAA Brianvators has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 04:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi DFW FAA Brianvators! Thanks for the cookie! Much appreciated! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Kashmorwiki

Kashmorwiki has been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. They have requested help from you. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Chicdat! Thanks for the message and for letting me know. I'll check it out and see what the user can do. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Reer Yusuf

Hi I would like help with the citation so as my work could go livwOmingokevin (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Omingokevin! Sure, I'll be happy to help you. What are you stuck on? Where at? What do you need the citation to do that it's not doing? Let me know and I'll be happy to help you. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

No subject

I just found the custom-made jackets so I added them if it's not appropriate then remove them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lerenjack (talk • contribs) 11:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Lerenjack! Welcome to Wikipedia! The reason I removed your edit was because it appeared to advertise or promote the custom-made jackets in the article with the external link. See Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:38, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Edits for the page: Hasan Tahsin Pasha

Good day,

I am not sure if you noticed that the "source" was written in the Text. That source is not supposed to be in the text, but down in the references section.

For this reason, I removed it. And for this reason I will remove it again. This time I will add the source down to the references section.

I am sorry for not explaining the edit, and also sorry about making the mistake of completely removing it instead of adding it to the reference section.

Best Regards,

InNeed95 (talk • contribs) 13:57, 07 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by InNeed95 (talk • contribs) 11:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi InNeed95! Thanks for the message and for letting me know. Yes, go ahead and remove the source from the article if something is wrong. If you need help with referencing and citing a source, let me know and I'll be happy to help you! Sorry for the confusion! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

I want to add a picture of the painting to wiki page

https://twitter.com/ThePainting4/status/1390615416075137026?s=19

https://www.instagram.com/p/COkZOeqM40R/?igshid=1qbery6k9srqp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themostexpinsivepainting (talk • contribs) 12:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Themostexpinsivepainting! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're glad to have you as a part of the community! Since you're brand new to Wikipedia, I highly recommend that you go through Wikipedia's getting started page and that you complete Wikipedia's new user tutorial before you make any edits or take on any major tasks around here. It will provide you with many important walkthroughs, guides, interactive lessons, and other information that will familiarize you with our policies and guidelines, how Wikipedia works, how to navigate around the site, and how to find important locations and pages. Most users who take this advice and complete the tutorial tell me later that it was significantly helpful to them and saved them hours of time and frustration they would've experienced otherwise. Please let me know if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Again, welcome! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A[REDACTED - Oshwah]

Andrew Lee Garza [REDACTED - Oshwah] Form Agarza1901 (talk) 13:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Agarza1901, and welcome to Wikipedia! Please know that Wikipedia is not for advertising or promoting yourself or anything else (even charities). Wikipedia aims to create encyclopedic content that's open and free for everyone to access and that's worded to reflect a neutral point of view. Please take some time to review Wikipedia's getting started page if you need help with how to contribute to the project in a beneficial way. It will provide you with a lot of useful information that you should know about. Please let me know if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Thanks - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
FYI, I took the eraser to some of these similar contributions, looked like PII - will let you follow up on the rest (feel free to revert or downgrade to revdel if you think better). — xaosflux Talk 13:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Xaosflux - Thanks, you probably beat me to it. ;-) I thought it might be PII as well, and I noticed that you suppressed the edits this user made with the same content. I'll leave the visibility alone; if you find that it's not PII, obviously feel free to change the visibility. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Kante revision

Hi, I believe Kante’s current form and general regard over his ability over the last few months deserves an update in status as being among the best players in the world in his position. Players like Sadio Mane still have this status despite mediocre performances and loss in worldwide regard over the past few months. In my humble opinion it would make Wikipedia seem fresher, sharper and more informed if the description of ‘being regarded as one of the best players in the world’ was served with more accuracy. Especially considering how frequently edits are made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.91.146 (talk) 13:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for leaving me a message regarding your edit to N'Golo Kanté. If you disagree with my removal and if you believe that it's worded to reflect a neutral point of view and is referenced by reliable sources, please don't hesitate to restore the content. I removed it due to these concerns, but I'm of course happy to discuss it further if you wish. If you have any questions or need help with anything, please let me know and I'll be happy to assist you. :-) Thanks again for the message. Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Reporting 196.33.103.54

196.33.103.54 (talk · contribs)

This editor is genre warring in the article Astroworld [1] [2] [3] [4]. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 13:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi TheAmazingPeanuts! I've warned the user for edit warring. If it continues to happen after the warning, let me know and I'll be happy to take another look. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
TheAmazingPeanuts - Also, you're both technically edit warring on that article. I highly advise that you don't make any more reverts. I don't want to see you get into trouble over it. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
I wasn't trying to get in a edit war with this editor. The editor was adding a genre that wasn't explicitly supported by source. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 13:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
TheAmazingPeanuts - Oh, I know you weren't trying to edit war. :-) I was letting you know that your repeated reverts constitute edit warring due to being done in a back-and-forth manner with the IP editor. I've advised the IP editor below to start a discussion on the article's talk page and to sort things out with you there. I trust that you'll work things out with them and help them to sort things out. If you need help with anything, let me know and I'll be happy to lend a hand. Just don't edit the article until things are all sorted; it'll keep you outta trouble. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Astroworld

I do not understand why there has to be a genre war with TheAmazingPeanuts as he is rejecting my edits, even with sources (I used 2, the first one he rejected, and the second one was the very same source he used for his own edit). I feel like he isn't open to any constructive discussion, as another user had already suggested changing the genre last year May and was completely ignored. I don't even want to be engaged in a war, it's just that he has absolutely no reason to be rejecting my edits other than he believes he's absolutely right, even with evidence to the contrary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.33.103.54 (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for leaving me a message about the dispute that's occurring on the Astroworld (album) article. The thing that both you and TheAmazingPeanuts need to do is discuss the dispute on the article's talk page here. Don't continue to make reverts to the content in the article; I've also let TheAmazingPeanuts know not to do the same. Discuss the issue on the article's talk page pacefully and civilly and try and work things out and come to a consensus together. If you have any questions or need help, please let me know and I'll be happy to lend a hand. :-) Cheers, and good luck! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, I have already tried to discuss it on the article's talk page two hours ago, but he has not replied, as he did with the user 2003:DB:1F30:20A2:2070:664:1CE7:C2FE who suggested a genre change last year. I just feel like the editor is not open to discussion on changing genres, and wants to rule the article with an iron fist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.33.103.54 (talk) 13:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
No problem. I've let TheAmazingPeanuts know that he/she needs to work with you on the article's talk page. I hope that he/she does so. I'm sorry that you feel this way; I doubt that this was TheAmazingPeanuts's intent. Give him/her a chance to work with you, and I'm certain that things will go smoothly. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
I left a response at the talk page. Sorry, I didn't see it until now. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
TheAmazingPeanuts - No worries. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Pests which I'd thought never return

I'd thought for a while that two of the Wikipedia pests had stopped doing their own things. LTA 1 today likes inserting the text "any body can get on wiki and type liesssssss Bye Barney b". At least you're there to protect anything which becomes frequently targeted. And yesterday LTA 2 has done the usual weekly trolling e.g. "Jonathan Field", "Harry Kirby", " "Lions" etc. I'd thought both of them had stopped doing their bad habits but it seems like I was certainly wrong. At least we have plenty of eyes watching over every article targeted for these purposes. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Iggy the Swan! Long time no chat! I hope you're doing well. :-) Yeah, the IP users that were adding the "Bye barney" edits was quite a stir. I added the content to my edit filter (#53), so you can keep eyes on that for further edits with that content. The user accounts, however, are quite different. They're not adding similar content to each article; I'm going to have to get creative and figure a way to track them. Shouldn't be too hard, but I'm going to have to try a little bit harder and think outside the box a little bit. ;-) Yes, indeed, I'm happy that there are plenty of eyes on things. The edit filter log I set up should help some, too. Let me know if you spot any more of these users, and I'll be happy to take a look at them. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
In all fairness, that edit filter is private from my point of view. But one day Wikipedia will win against these two LTA's, by evidence of Checkuser, they are two different people. Thankfully every filter out there is doing things rightly, private or not. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 19:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Iggy the Swan - Even though the filter is private, you should still be able to see the edit filter log and look through it. Indeed; one day we will win! ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Non-admins can't see hits for private filters or even the details of what triggered the filter (if the edit is disallowed), if they don't have efh/efm. Pahunkat (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Pahunkat - Oh, interesting. I thought that they just couldn't see the edit filter code, but had access to the logs. Whelp, I learned something new today, I guess... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:22, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

[Reer Yusuf]

I would like my article to go public. The title is [Reer Yusuf]. Kindly share your email address so I can share more.Omingokevin (talk) 16:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Omingokevin: The item Draft:Reer Yusuf was declined at review, since when nothing has been done to the to make it suitable for Wikipedia. The reviewer gave the main reason as lack of decent referencing / sourcing but there are also a number of grammatical, formatting and layout anomalies which make it not usable, as it stands, as a Wikipedia item. Some of these are of not very much import and can be dealt with as and when. However, the referencing needs to be addressed before the item can be accepted into the encyclopedia. Readability issues should be looked at as well. It might be an idea for you to review the guide to article creation and also to referencing as suggested by the reviewer. Eagleash (talk) 17:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Omingokevin! I apologize for the delay responding to your message here. See Eagleash's response above, as they've already covered what I would've said to you. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask and I'll be more than happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Request

Hi, User:Bobjörk is claiming to have been compromised, can you check the account in question to see if they’ve really regained control? There is a report on WP:ANI#User:Bobjörk claiming their account is compromised. --Heymid (contribs) 13:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Somebody else claimed to make an off-wiki request. Besides, it’d be appreciated to see if the user in question is being honest or is (likely) playing a game. --Heymid (contribs) 13:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
@Heymid: I'm the one who said I made an off-wiki request to check this – that simply involved me asking the sv.wiki admin and Wikimedia employee Julle, who is a good friend of mine in RL, to look into it. So as not to risk outing myself or anyone else, I don't really want to comment more on this here. Oshwah, if you want more info I can email you. --bonadea contributions talk 14:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Heymid - Let me ask some more seasoned checkusers what they do in this situation. Mz7, ST47, TonyBallioni - What do you do in situations like this? Thanks. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Lol. For those interested there's some comments from me about this at both ANI and my talk page. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Jolbert Cabrera article

Why did you edit that out? Jolbert Cabrera hit the walk off single that completed a 12-run comeback by the Indians against the Mariners! The citation can either be found on Youtube or [[5]|this site]]. 204.184.29.235 (talk) 20:41, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! I took the edit out because it didn't cite a reliable source. It looks like you've provided one, so go ahead and restore the edit. I'd advise citing that reference as well. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Email

Potentially time sensitive issue, so please read asap. FDW777 (talk) 21:07, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

FDW777 - Received and replied. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Changes

Hello, I am making changes compared to the official website of each team in question. For Chris Evans or Theo Riddick it's on the website of the Bengals and Raiders respectively. I can question the link every time if you prefer, no problem :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TornACL84 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi TornACL84! Thanks for leaving me a message and for letting me know. What you want to do is cite the reference that you're using in-line with the changes you're making. If you do this, you'll be good to go. If you have any questions about how to properly cite a reference, see this page for help. If you still have questions, let me know and I'll be happy to help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Help on a problem

Hello Oswah! I have a problem at East Asian people. One of the users apparently mistakes me for an LTA or duck IP. However I have already explained that I am neither (see the edit summary and my comment on the SPI. I am writing you as we both already interacted with a similar problem on Yamato people. Could you please take a look and help me to do not let this article become a mess. Thank you in advance and have a nice day.46.125.250.127 (talk) 07:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

They keep mistaken me for this sock user. I have now also commented on the SPI. For now I will stop reverting, but thus the article becomes a mess :(. I hope someone will take a closer look and see that I made improvements... Have a nice day anyway.46.125.250.127 (talk) 08:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! Thanks for leaving me a message here with your concerns. I apologize for the delay responding to you. Yes, I recommend that you don't keep reverting so that you're not edit warring, as that can get you blocked. I would politely and calmly respond to any accusations, and move on from there. If you're innocent and if you're not actually the sock user that you're being accused of being, you have nothing to worry about and you'll be fine. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your block has expired

Congratulations Oshwah, after 5 long years, your block by SQL has expired. Welcome back to editing. Naleksuh (talk) 14:24, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Naleksuh! Yay! I'm happy to be back! You can thank SQL for the block. :-P ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
@Oshwah: That edit wasn't by me. I don't know what the intent of that was. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
RandomCanadian - That was my fault. I had your username in my clipboard from responding to you earlier. I must not have copied Naleksuh's username to my clipboard as I thought! Sorry for the confusion! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Hah. Anyway, had a good laugh once I realised this was a silly mistake. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:23, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
RandomCanadian - I bet you did. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks For Reviewing

HI THERE, Im Jake Just wanted see how you are Hope you have a good rest of your time on Wiki good job on getting admin was it 2007? when you got it or later?, if you can't share it's fine but hope you have the best time/day or night. :) FemBoySentinal (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi FemBoySentinal! Welcome to Wikipedia! I actually joined Wikipedia in 2007, and was made an administrator in 2016. You can actually view my application for administrator by clicking here. Please let me know if you have any questions or need help with anything, and I'll be more than happy to lend a hand. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Really

Keeping a pretty close eye on the Pretty Little Liars page. Bored much? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6000:8c00:a70:8d1d:6f5:4ac:625d (talk) 01:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

self-promotion on user page

Hi Oshawh, you flagged me for possible self-promotion on my new user talk page Onelittlesong [[6]]. I am just trying to clearly disclose my conflict of interest and to follow the guidelines for doing so. Can you let me know what I can do better?Onelittlesong (talk) 01:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Onelittlesong! Welcome to Wikipedia! That was Wikipedia's automatic tagging of the edit, not me. :-) Your user page seems fine; just make sure that you comply with Wikipedia's policy on user pages, and you won't have any issues. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

No subject

Hi, Oshwah. I disagree with your removing references to media that has covered topics on Wikipedia. It is not for advertising/promotion. It is so users can go to sources outside of Wikipedia to learn more on the topic. I found an example of where this was allowed: on the Hadden Clark page, I found: Two-part series on The Last Podcast on the Left episodes "Hadden Clark Part I- Mommy's Basement Bakery" and "Hadden Clark Part II- Women's Panties", aired: November 2019.

How is this different? If I remove the link, will that meet the requirements?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by PiperLeroy (talk • contribs) 01:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi PiperLeroy! Welcome to Wikipedia! The reason why I removed your edits were due to concerns that the external links were added for advertising or promotion of the podcast. The edits also seemed unnecessary. If this isn't the reason for the addition of content, please accept my apologies for the confusion. Feel free to restore the edits, but I believe that other users might remove them as well. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Thanks for the message, and I hope you have a great day. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

No subject

Hi Oshwah, the article was removed as it is unsourced and does not reflect the reality, you sourced an old article from the daily telegraph, apparently with the attempt to defame and or vandalise the page, I also notice that you have posted similar articles in various pages, if you have any questions please send m a message, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordoftherings2211 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Lordoftherings2211! Welcome to Wikipedia! The reason I removed your edit here to Prince of Bismarck was because of a few concerns. First, your edit summary stated that the edit was "unsourced", but you removed a reference. This didn't make sense to me. Also, it's better to have an old source cited than no source at all. It would be better if you cited a newer source rather than remove the source cited. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Dear Oshwah, please let me know if I can help you with any questions you have about my rollback editing. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordoftherings2211 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

YASER J. K. ALSAIDI

Please return the deleted page because the person mentioned on the page is reliable and all the information mentioned on the page has been written transparently and completely correct and it is pure facts and was checked before writing it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr - YASER J. K. ALSAIDI (talk • contribs) 02:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Dr - YASER J. K. ALSAIDI! Welcome to Wikipedia! The article you created, YASER J. K. ALSAIDI, was nominated for speedy deletion because it does not make a credible claim of significance, nor explain why the article subject is significant in any way. It also appears, based off of the article title and your username, that you created an article about yourself. Please know that autobiographies are highly discouraged and frowned upon on Wikipedia, and usually results in the content or article being deleted. Writing about yourself also introduces a conflict of interest, since you're writing about, well, yourself. :-)
Since you're brand new to Wikipedia, I highly recommend that you go through Wikipedia's getting started page and that you complete Wikipedia's new user tutorial before you make any edits or take on any major tasks around here. It will provide you with many important walkthroughs, guides, interactive lessons, and other information that will familiarize you with our policies and guidelines, how Wikipedia works, how to navigate around the site, and how to find important locations and pages. Most users who take this advice and complete the tutorial tell me later that it was significantly helpful to them and saved them hours of time and frustration they would've experienced otherwise. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Thanks for the message, and I hope you have a great day. Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

How to add this to half-truths?

This based on his inaugural speech of January 20th, 2021. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.147.13 (talk) 04:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC) 

   In his inaugural speech on January 20th, 2021, President Biden (6:38 of the speech) is quoted to say, " Our history has been a constant struggle between the American ideal that we're all are created equal and the harsh ugly reality that racism, nativism, fear demonization have long torn us apart." The term 'we're all created equal' is part of the sentence in the U.S. Declaration of Independence, which Thomas Jefferson penned in 1776 during the beginning of the American Revolution that reads, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". Mr. Bidens statement is part of the entire sentence. President Biden also says (12:19 of the speech), " recent weeks and months have taught us a painful lesson there is truth and there are lies, lies told for power and for profit", and makes no mention of half-truths, that include truths that lie because they are part-of-the-truth.
(Talk page enjoyer) If this is phrased in your own words (excluding the quotes, of course), then add some citations to reliable source backing it up, then add it to Half-truth. You didn't add a source - which is necessary on Wikipedia. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! Your edit here to Half-truth was reverted because you didn't cite any references or reliable sources. You also added a political edit to the article Half-truth, which makes me concerned that the edit may not be implying or reflecting a neutral point of view, which is what we need to be doing with all content that is added to articles on Wikipedia. Please review these policies, and please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions. I'll be more than happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:13, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Re: Would a redirect to the actual youtube footage of the youtube speech be appropriate?
As in 6:38 or 12:23 of the video? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.147.13 (talk) 16:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! YouTube is not recommended as a source, as they're often unreliable and considered most times to be primary. A secondary source that's considered reliable would be better to cite. Why are you adding this content to the Half-truth article in the first place? I'm concerned that the edit may not be implying or reflecting a neutral point of view. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
How about using the Whitehouse site as a source?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/20/inaugural-address-by-president-joseph-r-biden-jr/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.147.13 (talk) 03:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
That wouldn't be a bad source to cite. It's better than YouTube. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks again. To avoid any further problems with this addition, would you be so kind to prepare the appropriate add on to the observation? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.147.13 (talk) 18:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, what exactly is it that you'd like me to do? I can't write the edit for you, but I can take a look at it and help you once you finish adding the content and citing the reference. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Here is the addition.
In his inaugural speech on January 20th, 2021, President Biden (6:38 of the speech) is quoted to say, " Our history has been a constant struggle between the American ideal that we're all are created equal and the harsh ugly reality that racism, nativism, fear demonization have long torn us apart." The term 'we're all created equal' is part of the sentence in the U.S. Declaration of Independence, which Thomas Jefferson penned in 1776 during the beginning of the American Revolution that reads, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". Mr. Bidens statement is part of the entire sentence. President Biden also says (12:19 of the speech), " recent weeks and months have taught us a painful lesson there is truth and there are lies, lies told for power and for profit", and makes no mention of half-truths, that include truths that lie because they are part-of-the-truth. [1]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.147.13 (talk) 21:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Sigh... I still have concerns at to whether or not this is necessary. But at least it's referenced... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Inaugural Address by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Available online at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/20/inaugural-address-by-president-joseph-r-biden-jr/

Thanks again!

Removed My Section From Blue Star Line

I recently added a little paragraph on Blue Star lines, you removed it. What was the reason? 86.23.67.255 (talk) 04:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! The reason I removed your edit was because it did not cite a reliable source. Can you locate a reliable source and cite it in-line with the content you're trying to add? :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Rajendra Kumar's Wikipedia editing

Hello I am editing the Wikipedia page of legendary Actor Rajendra Kumar and you are again and again changing back the things to the former . Understand please, he was a legendary artist and despite this fact, his Wikipedia page is not well developed like those of Rajesh khanna or Raj kapoor . The information I am adding is from his own biography "The Jubilee Kumar " You can verify. The things I am editing are just improving his Wikipedia page He is my most favourite and admired personality and I can't afford to see his Wikipedia page with limited info. It should be developed. Can I give you the information with source as well. So that you can yourself edit that page , if not me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.202.13.221 (talk) 05:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! You need to review and understand Wikipedia's policy on wording articles to reflect a neutral point of view. This is why I removed your edits. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

How do I change the existing logo on the Maroochydore State High School page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maroochydore_State_High_School

This logo is extremely old and we would like to replace it with the current logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylie Bobbermien (talk • contribs) 05:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Kylie Bobbermien! Welcome to Wikipedia! In order to update the logo on the school article, you just need to go here and upload a newer version of the file. Make sure that it isn't copyrighted, else it will be a serious violation of policy.
Since you're brand new to Wikipedia, I highly recommend that you go through Wikipedia's getting started page and that you complete Wikipedia's new user tutorial before you make any edits or take on any major tasks around here. It will provide you with many important walkthroughs, guides, interactive lessons, and other information that will familiarize you with our policies and guidelines, how Wikipedia works, how to navigate around the site, and how to find important locations and pages. Most users who take this advice and complete the tutorial tell me later that it was significantly helpful to them and saved them hours of time and frustration they would've experienced otherwise. Please let me know if you have any more questions, and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

JPEGMAFIA edit

Yes, I did edit JPEGMAFIA’s page about him rereleasing “The Ghost Pop Tape”. There is proof I can cite but it is only a YouTube video, which is blacklisted on Wikipedia. I believe this is Wikipedia worthy information and I don’t know what to do! Please help! (Aidanoprita0 (talk) 05:03, 11 May 2021 (UTC))

(Talk page enjoyer) @Aidanoprita0: additions to Wikipedia articles generally require reliable, secondary sources to determine whether information is worthy of inclusion. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Aidanoprita0! As Elli said above, all content on Wikipedia needs to be attributable to a reliable source that is secondary and independent of the article subject. Are you able to locate a source that's reliable that you can cite in-line with the article content? :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

No subject

The entry QX39 is incorrect and needs to be changed to avoid future confusion. These compounds were generated in our laboratory and patents and publications used in the entry are from our group. The entry needs to be changed to CA77.1 that is the correct name of the compound used in the studies with Alzheimer's that you reference in the page. We never used QX39 for in vivo studies in Alzheimer and the structure and other inforamtion entered there was incorrect. The compounds were described as QX in early days in the patent but have been published as CA and by using the old nomenclature that was not used in the publication we are worried this will create confusion. The mechanism of action was incorrect as neither QX39 nor CA77.1 target LAMP2A as indicate in the text. I have corrected the text for accuracy and include the very original reference of the parent compounds so readers interested can track the molecules. The main difference between the early series of compounds (AR7) and these ones is that we used extensive med chem to made them suitable for in vivo use and that lead to the Alzheimer's studies that are referred in the page. Please, provide guidance on how the entry could be changed from QX39 to CA77.1 in order to avoid confusion or dissemination of inaccurate information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amcuervo (talk • contribs) 07:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Amcuervo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Have you tried discussing your concerns on the article's talk page? This is the place where you'd go in order to start a discussion and voice your concerns. Other editors will be able to communicate and collaborate with you, and help you from there. Since you're brand new to Wikipedia, I highly recommend that you go through Wikipedia's getting started page and that you complete Wikipedia's new user tutorial before you make any edits or take on any major tasks around here. It will provide you with many important walkthroughs, guides, interactive lessons, and other information that will familiarize you with our policies and guidelines, how Wikipedia works, how to navigate around the site, and how to find important locations and pages. Most users who take this advice and complete the tutorial tell me later that it was significantly helpful to them and saved them hours of time and frustration they would've experienced otherwise. Please let me know if you have any more questions, and I'll be more than happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

No subject

hola cordial saludo, soy randy torres y le estan otorgando a otra persona los creditos de mi musica y cuando buscan mi musica como artista sale esta persona que dice ser randy torres mis perfiles originales que lo corroboran son "https://www.instagram.com/randytorresdj" "https://soundcloud.com/djrandytorres" https://www.skillboxes.com/blog/randy-torres-drops-his-debut-ep-infectral-on-streamin-music-group/

porfavor revisar eso! mil gracias — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexisaguilaralexis (talk • contribs) 13:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Alexisaguilaralexis! Welcome to Wikipedia! Even if I could verify that you're this person, it doesn't improve things when you remove content like that. It can be seen as disruptive when you remove content from articles without explaining why using the edit summary. If there are issues with the article, you should discuss them on the article's talk page. This way, other editors can comment and discuss your concerns and help you resolve them properly. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. Thank you for the message, and I hope you have a great day! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

I need your help

Can you assist me with editing the so my article can go publicReer Yusuf article? reer yusuf (talk)Omingokevin (talk) 16:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Omingokevin! Welcome to Wikipedia! I'll be more than happy to help you and point you in the right direction. Have you seen Wikipedia's articles for creation process? This process helps new users to create a draft page, and then have it reviewed by an editor who is a reviewer, and published once the article is approved by them. This way, you can spend all the time you need building and designing the draft article, and then have it reviewed once it's ready. I highly recommend using this process to publish your first article, as it will provide you with the necessary assistance that most new editors will need.
Since you're brand new to Wikipedia, I highly recommend that you go through Wikipedia's getting started page and that you complete Wikipedia's new user tutorial before you make any edits or take on any major tasks around here. It will provide you with many important walkthroughs, guides, interactive lessons, and other information that will familiarize you with our policies and guidelines, how Wikipedia works, how to navigate around the site, and how to find important locations and pages. Most users who take this advice and complete the tutorial tell me later that it was significantly helpful to them and saved them hours of time and frustration they would've experienced otherwise. Please let me know if you have any more questions or need help with anything else, and I'll be happy to assist you. :-) Thank you for the message, and I hope you have a great day! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you assist me by reviewing my article and let me know if it is ok. If it is fine you can also assist by approving it. The article Reer Yusuf Reer Yusuf (talk)Omingokevin (talk) 17:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Omingokevin - Sure, I can give it a look. Where is the article located? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Osh, yes that is what I meant by two versions. @Omingokevin: duplicate drafts for the same topic can cause confusion and / or take up the time of other volunteers. It is not really a very good idea to try to avoid WP:AFC by asking others to review (essentially 'juumping the queue'). Eagleash (talk) 18:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Eagleash - Thanks for clarifying. :-) Correct, which is why I redirected Omingokevin to the AFC process - so that we don't skip the line and give special treatment. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
How long does it take for AFC to take place? Omingokevin (talk) 18:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Omingokevin - I don't know what the exact timeline is right now, but in the past, the backlog has resulted in reviews taking anywhere from a week to a few months to get done. I don't believe that this is the case anymore. Just be patient; someone will review your submission. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Last I looked (couple of days ago) it was about 5 months. (There's no deadline as far as Wikipedia is concerned). Eagleash (talk) 18:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
OK, we still seem to have the userspace version and the draft version; one needs to go. The userspace is in better condition than the draft but it is the wrong location. The content at the userspace could be amalgamated into the draft and the userpage used for its intended purpose of telling the Wikipedia community a little about the user and how they intend to contribute to the encyclopedia. The draft had (still has) a number of anomalies as does the userpage and the combined item should be edited in line with the article creation guidelines and the manual of style as well as carefully studying the notability requirements. It should be submitted via WP:AFC when considered ready. Eagleash (talk) 18:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you go through the article and check if there is any changes that can be made or should be made.... Please. Omingokevin (talk) 18:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) You cannot cite Wikipedia. See WP:CIRCULAR. The remaining sources only seem tangentially related to the topic of the article and are not sufficient to support the idea that it is a notable topic. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Adding perms to second account

Hello,

I am writting to find out if you could add my perms to User:CloudyEagle, my second account. I am asking because I imagine it will require a CU to verify.

Thanks, NW1223 | Howl at me 17:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi NightWolf1223! It's actually easier than that! Are you able to log into your CloudyEagle account and respond here to verify that the account belongs to you? :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:03, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed. CloudyEagle (talk) 18:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
NightWolf1223, CloudyEagle - Thanks for doing that!  Done. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks very much

Hey Oshwah, thanks very much for handling my SPI request so quickly. Cheers.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 22:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikaviani - You're welcome; always happy to lend a hand. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Dr levy page

Hi the information that has been removed by me needs to stay removed as this is misleading information and part of an on going trial and current litigation

Please reach out if you have any questions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:5:814::56 (talk) 01:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! I don't understand how the content is misleading. Can you please explain? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
I took another look at the content. I see that a lot of it isn't referenced at all, so I agree with your edit removing the content. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Graffiti in Iran edit removal

I believe my edit was removed incorrectly. Unless I did it incorrectly, I in fact DID cite/source the information I added to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meckdee (talk • contribs) 01:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Meckdee! Thanks for leaving me a message and for letting me know. Please accept my apologies - after reviewing your edit, I noticed that you did cite a source. I restored your changes to the article. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, and I'll be happy to help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Editing Wikipedia The Hour Glass

Hi Oswah

This is regarding the email you have sent me in my office box and also asking for the proof of the edits- this are our company info/ about us source:

Please check further info here:

The reason why I'm editing this wikipedia for our : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hour_Glass_(company)

Im edited the about us: History:www.thehourglass.com

Our source is from here: we have updated boutiques and info. Please I'm looking forward to have your reply on this asap. We will need to update the latest info on wikipedia as information inputed here - the audiences are able to check and they would wanted to have the latest info example- 40 boutique- we have now more than 47 boutique. so here you go, we have more info on the changes about our company info hence it is important for us to add the relevant info.

This are source: please go to our website- this layout didnt allow me to insert the website link- please google our company name" The Hour Glass" and click about us: https://www.thehourglass.com/about-us/

Please check and let us know as I will edit with the info. Thanks Thank you so much Kubera09 (talk) 04:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Kubera09! Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm concerned that you may have a conflict of interest with the article subject. You keep referring to them as "our company" and referring to yourself as "we". Do you work for this company? Are you being paid to edit Wikipedia and this article? If you are, you must disclose this by following the directions here. You should not be editing article subjects and topics on Wikipedia where you have a personal conflict of interest with. It degrades the quality and verifiability of the articles you edit, and it makes it nearly impossible to word content to reflect a neutral point of view when you do so. Please consider focusing on articles and topics that interest you but where you have no conflict of interest with. If you have any questions or if you need help with anything, please let me know and I'll be happy to lend a hand. :-) Thank you for the message, and I hope you have a great day! Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Therazzors

For obvious new sockpuppets, does one have to reopen a Sockpuppet investigation or is there a single place to report them, other than pinging administrators?

--Calton | Talk 05:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Calton! I hope you're doing well! Yes, let's open a new SPI report. This way, we can document these accounts for historical and record-keeping purposes and have them looked into properly. All you need to do is follow the directions over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations under the "How to open an investigation" guide. This will allow you to file another SPI report quickly. Once you do this, let me know and I'll be happy to take a look at it. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

I want to do the right thing

Cu is Needed on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jack90s15 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Account 3000 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Account 3000 - You're not actually doing the right thing, you know... You can't just keep creating new accounts like this and expect that you won't be blocked. Do you want to be able to come back to Wikipedia and contribute positively to the encyclopedia? You need to log into your original account, Jack90s15, after you've gone six months without violating any policies (so no creating sock puppets), and appeal your block. This is how you do the right thing, not what you're doing now, which is to create multiple accounts in order to skirt the radar. If you have any questions, log into your Jack90s15 account, and you can ask me there. Thanks for the message and for trying to do the right thing. I think you need to do the true right thing by following policy and properly appealing your block. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:26, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Mail

Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

aeschyIus (talk) 18:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

AeschyIus - Received and replied. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Grind History

Hello, Oshwah,

For some reason, the sockpuppet template shows that a sockpuppet category still needs to be created even though one exists. I've seen this happen about 4 or 5 times previously but I don't know how to "fix" the template so that the "create this category" message goes away. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Liz! I hope you're doing well. :-) It's actually an easy fix. You just need to purge the page cache by adding ?action=purge at the end of the URL of the user page of the sock user. I went ahead and did this for you. Please don't hesitate to let me know if I can help you with anything else, and I'll be happy to do so. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Ah, a purging trick that I didn't know about. Thanks for the info. As for other help, I've gone to several different CUs with questions about a couple of editors that didn't warrant filing a full SPI and that has been helpful. I don't want to pester any specific CU so thanks for the offer of your help. Your talk page though is watched more than others (1,144 page watchers? Wow!) so I'm aware of the increased visibility of any comments I might make here which is probably why I email you sometimes rather than post on your talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 00:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Liz! No problem! Always happy to help! :-) Asking questions about users that you believe might be socks shouldn't be seen as "pestering" (at least I don't see it that way). If you do need to email me for input or advice, by all means, feel free to do so. My user talk page and my email is always open to you. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Leptotyphlops humilis referred to genus Rena

Hello, I changed the genus Leptotyphlops to Rena in the page on Micruroides, since Wikipedia refers all Leptotyphlops now to Rena here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rena_(snake) Sorry I am new to this and not an expert in snake taxonomy, but this keeps consistency with what's on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.176.112.138 (talk) 03:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for the message and for letting me know. I'll go ahead and restore the edit you made to the article. I apologize for the confusion, and I appreciate you for bringing this to my attention. If you have questions or need anything else, please don't hesitate to let me know. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Revdel?

Should this edit be revdeleted? NonsensicalSystem(error?)(.log) 11:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

NonsensicalSystem - Yeah, that can offend people. I rev del'd it. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Spi abuse and retaliation against me

Hello Oshwah I have been having disputes with another user about sources. As of yesterday they accused me of being a sock puppet and now today they're accusing me of being another sock puppet. It seems like they're using any little thing to get me banned since I don't agree with their viewpoint https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jack90s15 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nicky3331. Just wanted to bring you this to your attention since you worked on yesterday's SPI and also it doesn't seem like it's going to help being new users to Wikipedia, If they're being accused everyday of being different sock puppets.Thelostone41 (talk) 14:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Thelostone41! Thanks for bringing this issue to my attention. I'm sorry that you're not having the best experience on Wikipedia due to the accusations. Please do your best to try and move on from those - I promise that Wikipedia is a great community to be apart of and contribute to. :-) Don't let the accusations get to you; I've been accused of lots of silly things. In the end, if it's not true, nothing is going to happen to you. :-) Please let me know if you have any questions, or if you need my input or advice on anything, and I'll be happy to respond and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Oshwah That's why I brought it to all the administrators attention as it seems they are trying to use any little thing to get me banned.Thelostone41 (talk) 17:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Thelostone41 - I appreciate you for doing that. :-) Let me know if I can help you with anything else, and I'll be happy to do so. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Another request

Can you also add the autoconfirmed flag to my account so I can use Twinkle? Thank you, CloudyEagle (talk) 15:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

CloudyEagle -  Done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia's two pests

They're at it again I'd noticed over the past two days e.g. this yesterday with the usual 58 character insertion of Barney nonsense and e.g. this today. It is surprising that Wikipedia is still allowing this to continue, hopefully not much longer. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Iggy the Swan! It's good to talk to you again! :-) It looks like Zzuuzz has blocked the IP range, so hopefully this resolves the issue. If any more shenanigans continue, please let me know and I'll be happy to take a look. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Justin

Luca you Look good luck with your day love you guys are having some fun time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.195.247.136 (talk) 21:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Umm... Hi! How are you? I'm not sure what you're talking about. Do you need help with something? :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

About an investigation

There is some kind of confusing going on.

I'm not Dibosh Chakma. Actually he (Dibosh) was the previous owner of the mobile that I am using right now. I bought the mobile from Dibosh couple of weeks ago. Therefore my cousin taught me how to edit in Wikipedia. That's why, though I am new but I know the basics of editting in Wikipedia.

As far as I know that the IP address still remains the same if the mobile owner is changed. This is why, some other users think that I am Dibosh Chakma. অগ্নিশিখা (talk) 04:05, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

IMMEDIATE ACTION NEEDED!

This IP Special:Contributions/5.43.73.49 is vandalizing continuously, and he/she/they has deleted many, many warnings from his/her/their talk page. I have reported the user at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, and the user is continuously vandalizing! QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 14:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/5.43.64.0/19 I think this IP is related. QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 15:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
A longer term rangeblock might be useful here... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi RandomCanadian, QuantumRealm! It looks like the 5.43.64.0/19 range has been blocked for 6 months; issue resolved! If you see any more shenanigans like this, please don't hesitate to let me know and I'll be happy to take a look. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
"Further shenanigans" - speak of the devil, they're already back at it: see for ex. [9]... I see Fastily has already given Special:Contributions/77.221.2.16 a block, but a more durable solution might be semi-protecting the affected pages. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:40, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
RandomCanadian - Thanks for the heads up. I'll keep an eye on things and take appropriate action if it continues... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Revert of DarkSide (hacking group)

I believe I only made one or two changes to that page. The only one I actually remember making is to change "behind" to "the cause of" which in my opinion has the same meaning but is much better, more precise English. At any rate, saying an organization was "behind" something is vague, figurative and is basically slang; some more definite phrase should be substituted. So if that's my change you didn't like, then I do disagree. If something else, I would have to see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:2fc0:f:81d9:9d27:e036:57c9 (talk) 01:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, and thanks for leaving me a message here regarding your edit to the DarkSide (hacking group) article. The reason I reverted your edit was due to concerns I had regarding your changes and Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy - especially when you changed the word "image" to now say "propaganda". I felt that the previous wording was more in-line with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy than what it was changed to, and I reverted your edit on that basis. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding that policy and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. Thanks again for the message, and I hope you have a great day! :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive IP

Can you block 76.29.49.227, their edits to Brown Line (CTA) and more recently North Central Service are quite disruptive and always use the same useless edit summary. IP was warned many times already. Cards84664 01:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cards84664! Thanks for leaving me a message regarding your concerns with this IP user and their edits. I apologize for the delay responding to your message; I've been busy lately, and I'm just getting caught up with all of the Wikipedia emails, pings, messages, and requests that I received while I was offline. :-) It looks like the IP user has been blocked, so the issue looks to be resolved. If any more disruption occurs from this IP after their block expires, please don't hesitate to let me know and I'll be more than happy to look into it. :-) Thanks again for the message, and I wish you a great day! Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Could you please block this editor?

Special:Contributions/LorF_Haow_NnSd_Fusj_Beia_Najs_Pooa_Qosn_Disj_Idiwn_Owms For blatant WP:NOTHERE behavior. Johnnyconnorabc (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Johnnyconnorabc: I think this could have been dealt via AIV? In any case, @Oshwah: their creations probably need nuking under G3, if you see what I mean. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
RandomCanadian - Thanks - nuked. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Unrelated

Hijacking the section to ask for advice. I left an editor a message about an unhelpful edit of theirs ([10]) on their talk page. This is how they responded. Now I left them a very stern statement on their talk page about that, since, reading just diagonally through it I can see a couple of nasty insinuations... Don't think it's prima vista blockable (although I've been previously harassed so it's not very far from it), but if you or any talk page watcher has further advice on how to handle this kind of shenanigans or is willing to take a watchful look over the relevant article that would be nice. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi RandomCanadian! Aside from the accusations and finger-pointing, that user's response went off on unrelated tangents and made absolutely no sense at all to me. Honestly, my advice would be to just ignore it and move on. I wouldn't have even left the user that warning you left for their response on your user talk page. Warning a user for something they did on your own talk page is equivalent to yelling "stop poking me!" It rarely works, and just signals to the user that you're taking their response personally and that you don't like it - something that trolls thrive on and gobble as their food. ;-) You warned the user for their edit to the article - that's all you need to do. Just ignore their rant, move on, and keep an eye out for any more issues by that user with further edits to articles. Treat them like you would any other editor and disregard the fact that they went off on you like that. No need to make things more complicated. ;-) If the user does start to harass and hound you repeatedly, please let me know. I'll be happy to step in if things get out of control. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

CU and SPI questions

Hi Oshwah! I am not challenging your decisions, I am asking because I feel my understanding of CU policy (and where to look at policy) is lacking to the point that when I file a SPI I feel it is a crapshoot whether to request CU or not in some cases.

In Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Comedian Warmatep you stated that DUCK evidence doesn't require CU to confirm (I was asking for CU not just to confirm, but to uncover other instances, but lets leave it at confirming). User:AmandaNP declined similarly for Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lass-Lass.

What is unclear to me, is how this is based on the CheckUser policy. Wikipedia:CheckUser#Grounds for checking states that sock pupperty is grounds for checking. I don't see how the "duck" case falls under WP:CUPRIVACY. I also don't see anything on meta.

However, the "duck" case clearly falls under procedure given that both you and AmandaNP declined for exactly the same reason. My question is, where can I read about this procedure? Or read about guidance about when to ask for CU and when not? I am asking so that I fill out the CU requested field in my SPI reports in a better fashion.

Another question, arising from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lass-Lass, I avoided placing user warnings (aside from automatic speedy-deletion notices from Twinkle I didn't prevent) on the talk page of Homesand (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), and did not report Homesand to AIV (which I probably could've given the amount of disruptive edits I reverted) as they were an obvious DUCK and I had already reported them to SPI. However, SPI seems very slow these days, like this case was declined by CU on DUCK (but the account wasn't blocked...) the same day, the account was blocked 26 hours later (because someone else reported them to AIV), and the SPI was closed 8 days later with "Nothing left to do here, closing" by User:RoySmith. In the meantime, another DUCK appeared and was reported by someone else at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Homesand. Now, my question from all this is whether I should report such a user to SPI at all? I could easily foresee that I would have enough activity for a vandalism-only/NOTHERE block at AIV in short order, and that noticeboard is handled more briskly. Is it worth while keeping a trail of activity of these socks?--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 06:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Eostrix! Thanks for leaving me a message here with your questions and concerns regarding SPI. In short, the answer is "yes" - you should definitely file SPI reports when you believe that sock puppetry is occurring. Even if a CU declines running a check on the particular report you file, it's still looked into by clerks and administrators, who run a behavioral investigation on the accounts and decide on action from there. If you could take away only one thing from this response, remember this: CU data does not preclude a behavioral analysis and obvious sock puppetry. If CU data came back and determined that two accounts were in completely different areas around the world, and if a behavioral investigation concludes that the two users are obvious sock puppets based on their edits and behavior, the behavioral investigation takes complete precedence and the accounts would be blocked. :-)
I used to run checks on accounts that were exhibiting DUCK behavior, but I was told by AmandaNP that these checks are unnecessary due to the nature of the evidence being obvious. From then on, I declined these requests as this is what she told me should be done. I'll let Amanda comment further on this response with her reasoning and rationale. I don't mind at all running checks for DUCK evidence and findings - especially if the request states that a sleeper check is needed. If I declined a request when you had asked for a sleeper check, please accept my apologies in advance and just make sure that you state this clearly in future SPI reports when you request a checkuser. This way, I'll be sure to be aware that your request entails a sleeper check, and I'll be happy to look into it with that mindset.
If you have any further questions regarding SPI reports, CU checks, and the line between where they'll be accepted or declined, please let me know and I'll be happy to try and explain things further. The last thing I want you to be is confused over how we handle SPI cases, and I'm sure that they haven't been handled consistently from checkuser to checkuser. That sucks, and we need to do better at being consistent. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! I will continue to file SPI reports when sockpuppetry is obvious. If you or AmandaNP could point out a page to read (other than Wikipedia:CheckUser that I read and is very general) on guidance on when to request CU for SPI, I would very much appreciate it and it will help me categorize my SPI requests better, saving time for all involved.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 06:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Eostrix - No problem; always happy to help! :-) Amanda might have an essay or page under her belt that she can share with you that helps explain when to and when not to request a CU. Just remember not to take it personally or take it as something you've done wrong simply because a CU or clerk declined your request for a CU at SPI. If anything, you'll get the hang of it and you'll learn the threshold as you file more cases. :-) Have you reviewed Wikipedia's duck test and signs of sockpuppetry pages? They do well to explain DUCK behavior and where there are signs of sockpuppetry that may not be obvious. They might not give you exactly what you're looking for, but they'll definitely point you in the right direction and help you nonetheless. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

No subject

Hello I have done a n edit on the page List of Hindu Deities. I have learnt Sanskrit. The meaning of koti is ofcourse 10 million, but in this context it means type. This is why there are 3 types of gods. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.91.80.47 (talk) 06:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for leaving me a message regarding your edit to List of Hindu deities. The reason I reverted your edit was because it removed content from the article and didn't explain why using the edit summary. Was there a reason why the content was removed? In the future, you'll want to use edit summaries to explain your edits and why you're making them. This will help avoid any confusion and issues in the future with other editors. Please let me know if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Improper addition of personal controversies in a political alliance page (Left Democratic Front)

There is continuous addition of improper personal controversies in the History of Page: Left Democratic Front (Kerala) by User:Kambliyil. Please Revert those changes. Sreein Sreedhar (talk) 09:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sreein Sreedhar, and thanks for leaving me a message here with your concerns regarding the Left Democratic Front (Kerala) article. If there's a dispute or issue with the content between yourself and Kambliyil, you need to start a discussion on the article's talk page here. Discuss your concerns with the user, and let the user know that you've started the discussion by messaging them on their user talk page. This is the proper way to settle the dispute. Please do not continuously revert the article, as this is edit warring, and is not allowed on Wikipedia. If you have any more questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to let me know and I'll be happy to help you futher. Thanks! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi dear Oshwah

I sincerely ask you to leave your e-mail address on my talk page.i need the help of an experienced person like you MichealCarrik (talk) 09:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi MichealCarrik! Emails should only be sent if the request involves information that's private or that needs to be removed from edit histories or logs. I'll be more than happy to help you here! What do you need help with exactly? :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
I am preparing an athlete's Wikipedia page and I am sure that this athlete meets the notability criteria, but some users have reasons that are not correct.
Delete is trying to delete the article by writing on the discussion page. For example, a user says that the athlete has never participated in the world championship, but I am sure that this athlete has participated in the world championship.Maybe I did not make the page properly, I ask you to correct the wrong things and republish the page. Page is Nabi Mammadov — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichealCarrik (talk • contribs) 09:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
MichealCarrik - Have you reviewed and do you understand Wikipedia's guidelines on the notability of article subjects? Specifically, you want to review Wikipedia's guide on the notability of sports and athletes in this case. These guides will help you to gauge whether or not the person that you're trying to write an article about meets Wikimedia's guidelines. If the person doesn't, then they can't have an article yet. We'll have to wait until they become notable before we create one. Please take some time and review the guidelines I've linked you to. If you have any questions about them, please don't hesitate to ask me, and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. The first hurdle to get you through is to have you review those guidelines so that you understand them. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
I am so sorry for disturbing you but ,the problem is that there aren't any notability rules at guidelines about sambo competitors but there are lots of wikipedia articles of sambo athletes — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichealCarrik (talk • contribs) 10:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
MichealCarrik - There's no need to apologize. I'm more than happy to help you. :-) There might not be specific guidelines on the notability of sambo competitors, but there are guidelines for the general notability of athletes that you can read here. It's an extension of Wikipedia's general notability guidelines and the basic criteria for the notability of people. There's an AFD dicussion that's open where users have added rationale and input that cites these specific guidelines. I'd give these guidelines a read, then go through the AFD discussion to see what they're referencing. The chances appear likely that this person is not notable given the discussion there. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Oshwah, just to say your being super good in Wikipedia and thanks for answering all my questions. :) Thank you so much and your being good here. [-=-]\-XecityZaien (talk) 11:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)-/[-=-]

Hi XecityZaien! Thank you for the very kind words. :-) You're very welcome; always happy to help! If you run into any more questions, please don't hesitate to message me here and ask them. I'll be more than happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Kind of you to introduce yourself ... I'm a "newbie" -

Hi, Oshwah:

Thanks for "connecting" and reaching out... Now that I've been through a course on editing I'm ready to begin. I'll be working on a new page starting tomorrow (still conducting the required research). Hope we stay in touch... I may take you up (down the line) on your kind offer to assist.

Best to you and thank you!DLMCIVER (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi DLMCIVER! Welcome to Wikipedia! Please do; I'll be more than happy to help you with anything that you need. Just leave me a message here if you run into any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them. If you haven't already, I'd go through Wikipedia's getting started page and complete Wikipedia's new user tutorial. Both pages are extremely helpful, and they'll answer any basic questions you might run into. Again, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy your stay with us and that you have a great day. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop

Hi can you please stop reverting my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatAnnoyingGuyIsMe (talk • contribs) 22:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Rust Valley Restorers Update

Hi Oshwah,

I'm Tyson Hepburns production assistant. The executive producer of Rust Valley Restorers. I updated the page on his request and with his personal notes/edits. Could you please revert the changes.

Best.

Jeremy Honeyman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D08:5D7E:DC00:8501:BB4A:B737:E82 (talk) 22:25, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Unfortunately, I cannot revert the changes you made. First of all, one of your edits violated Wikipedia's copyright policies by copying text straight from an external source. Your other edit was completely unreferenced and not cited or supported by a reliable source. This is the reason why your changes to the Rust Valley Restorers article was removed. Please review the policies and guidelines regarding copyright and verifiability, and let me know if you have any questions about them. I'll be more than happy to answer them and help you. :-) Thanks for the message, and I wish you a great day. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

You asked me to write you

Hi Oshwah

You sent me a "User talk" message, asking me to contact you here regarding my edit to the Khaled Mashal article, which "seemed less than neutral to [you], so [you] removed it for now." To what edit are you referring?

Apologies in advance if this message isn't formatted correctly. I'm not used to Wikipedia correspondence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.252.200.151 (talk) 22:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for leaving me a message regarding your edit to the Khaled Mashal article. The reason that I reverted your edit was because it added the word "terrorist" to it, which appeared to me to be opinon-based moreso than fact. This gave me concerns that you weren't wording the article to reflect a neutral point of view when you call something a "terrorist" organization. Please review Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view, and please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Thanks again for the message, and I wish you a great rest of your day. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Just saying...

I would have done the same thing, in your shoes. That's what made it so funny. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 23:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

MjolnirPants - LOL! Especially given the fact that the user page contained the phrase "suckpuppet", the same exact phrase that an LTA used a few days ago on their user page when attempting to troll. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Oh yeah. See here for the context of why I made it and the joke made with it. Not half as funny as that account getting blackballed within minutes of being created, though.
Had I remembers Poe's law, I'd have edited up it's user page before commenting anywhere else. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 23:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
MjolnirPants - That's funny! Just be careful about creating accounts like that. I just don't want to see you get into any trouble. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
I already declared it on the user page, just to avoid any appearance of impropriety. Whether you want to unblock it or not is up to you, though be warned: if you do, I'll probably use it to make more bad jokes. You might even have to... [shudders]... read some of them. I might have a good use for it soon (I'm planning on working on some modules that might need multiple accounts to test), but I don't mind asking for it to be unblocked when/if that happens, if you're uncomfortable with an unblocked joke account just laying around. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 23:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
MjolnirPants - HA! Well, you can always make an unblock request... :-P ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
See, now you're just mocking me, lol ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 23:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
I would never do such a thing! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Poor little UnbiasedSentinelOfTruthFreedomAndFacts! 'Shonen unblock! darwin bish 17:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC).
LOL ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

firefox

  • Visual Editor does not work nice with firefox lol. Any way to fix it? --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 23:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    Hi つがる! Good question - I use Firefox as my main browser, but I don't use the visual editor. Are there any extensions or add-ons that you might have installed that could be interfering with the Visual Editor's ability to operate properly? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:43, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    Nope! Just a pink and black browser theme (and if you consider Linux Mint to be malware, then ok?...) lol --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
    つがる - Interesting. I wonder if there are any current known issues with the Visual Editor and the use of Firefox. Again, I'm not sure if there are - I don't use the Visual Editor. I grew up on Wikipedia where editing the page source was the only choice you had. Hence, that's what I always use. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Oh, and zero of the other userscripts have even work here, and the vector skin I use is cursed because it's layout is so messed up つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
(Talk page enjoyer) @つがる: what issues do you have with Visual Editor on Firefox? (though, I'd strongly recommend to use Visual Editor for nothing other than editing tables, it's really not ideal and it's good to learn Wikitext) Elli (talk | contribs) 01:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Elli The dialogue box(es) get stuck on the top of my screen and I only see half of the box, because the other half is out of my sreen and they won't scroll down, this is for Simple English Wikipedia I have problems with, but here I have problems with all userscripts also つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 02:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Weather Underground

The article describes the WU as "radical" rather than 'far' Left yet the link to "radical" is even headed as "far-left". This organisation also murdered policemen and others in pursuit of political goals: an adequate definition of terrorism rather than militant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:23c5:1707:fd00:c8eb:db63:d949:29a8 (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! It's not up to us to define "terrorism". As much as we want to label them terrorist, it adds bias and original thought to the article, something we shouldn't be doing. This is why I reverted your edit. Please review Wikipedia's policy on wording articles to reflect a neutral point of view, and let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Charles C Hagemeister

I edited this page on May 19, 2021 to accurately note the psssing of my father. Could you please correct this.

Sincerely- Shagemeister (talk) 04:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Shagemeister! Welcome to Wikipedia! The reason that I reverted your edit was because it did not reference or cite a reliable source. Do you have a reliable source that supports the content you tried to add to the article? :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism by user

Hi why did you reject my report for this user who was adding unsourced information and shows which are not exist. This user User:115.97.203.57 has been adding nonsense in the pages look here [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] please do something about this User:Oshwah block permanently please.

Also I have tagged you in a talk page discussion about Devoleena Bhattacharjee's wrong date of birth year which the correct one is 1990. I have given proof as well. Please change that as well. The source given for the other year was only one rs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎86.156.8.13 (talk) 08:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Oshwah Please could you reply please go to the talk page I have tagged you please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.13 (talk) 14:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! I don't remember declining a report that you filed regarding this user. I must've missed it and accidentally deleted it. It looks like the disruption has stopped as of yesterday, but please keep an eye on this user and let me know if they continue disrupting the project. I'll be happy to take another look. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
User:Oshwah Hi just wanted to tell you that User:115.97.203.57 this user again has been adding a lot of unsourced and untrue information. Please check the history for proof and is removing content from pages. please block the user indefinite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roshnikaur123 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Roshnikaur123! Thanks for responding and for letting me know. I apologize for the delay responding to your message. Life has kept me busy, and I'm just now getting caught up with all of the Wikipedia messages and emails I received while I was offline. If this user is still adding unsourced and inaccurate information to articles, warn them. If they continue despite multiple warnings, report the user to AIV so that it can be looked into. Please let me know if you have any more questions or concerns, and I'll be happy to help you further. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Recurring transphobic vandalism from static IP

I see that you warned 47.187.133.104 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for his latest vandalism. The edits he's making are the exact same as the sort he got blocked for last week under multiple IPs and probably as TheFreeGene (talk · contribs) (SPI). He already vowed to keep vandalizing on this topic indefinitely, and the IP seems to be static, so I was wondering if a new block might be in order, perhaps more than the 24 hours he got last time. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 11:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Tamzin! Thanks for the message and for the heads up. I've blocked the IP for two weeks for their disruptive edits. If any shenanigans continue after the block expires, please let me know and I'll be happy to take another look. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Any thoughts on what's going on with the IPs at Special:PageHistory/Jim Sterling? 2600:100c:b250:536a:41df:c036:11d3:2b62 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 2a02:ab88:e42:9880:b4b3:3461:90fb:bcf5 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), and 2a00:23c4:9dca:9000:914f:cb58:253e:d4da (talk · contribs · WHOIS) all use variants of the "grammatical mistakes" summary favored by TheFreeGene and 47.187. 2600:100c (which was used during the initial wave of vandalism on the 14th) geolocates to the same part of Texas as 47.187. But 2a02:ab88 geolocates to Hungary, 2a00:23c4 to England. Are we looking at proxies here? Coordination? Or just coincidental use of the same edit summary? ("Grammar" as justification for pronoun-warring is far from unheard-of, but it strikes me as relatively unlikely for three vandals to independently be using it on the same article.) -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 08:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
P.S. I see you haven't been around much the past week or two, so I welcome thoughts from any talk page stalkers. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 08:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Tamzin! I apologize for the delay responding to your message here. I've been busy with real life things, and I'm just now catching up with all of the Wikipedia messages and emails I received. I'm not sure what went on with the Jim Sterling article, but things seemed to have calmed down since then. If things continue, warn the users involved. If multiple warnings don't suffice, report them to AIV. If you have any more questions or concerns, please let me know and I'll be happy to help you further. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry?

Hi Oswah. Seems like there is some sockpuppetry going on here as well [20] --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi HistoryofIran! Thanks for the message and for letting me know about this. I ran a check on the account and  Confirmed that they're sock puppets of KızılBörü1071. I've blocked them and added temporary semi-protection to the article. If you see any more disruption from this sock, please let me know so that I can take a look and put a kibosh to the socking. :-) Thanks again for the message, and I wish you a great rest of your day. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Issue need solving

User:Oshwah Ok also I have tagged you in Devoleena Bhattacharjee's talk page regarding the wrong date of birth year. Please look there please and change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.13 (talk) 17:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Oshwah Please reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.13 (talk) 17:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! According to the talk page discussion, there are multiple sources that state her birthday to be different dates. Since we're not sure which one is correct, I went into the article and removed the date of birth completely until we can figure out what's going on. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Thanks - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
User:Oshwah Correction there are more sources about her age being 1990 which I have given. The other 32 age has only given one source please read the discussion again. Look here [21] [22] [23] it says here she was 28 in 2018. [24] these are the ones which I given of her age being in the year of 1990. Please read the sources here. So I think you have been mistaken and please add the date to 22 August 1990.
You need to take your sources and findings and bring it up in the discussion on the article's talk page. Discuss the issue with the other editors involved and come to a consensus. Until this is figured out, it's better to leave the birthdate off of the article, since we don't really know what it is given the inconsistency of the dates given by the different references. Once that's figured out, someone will be able to edit the article and add the correct date of birth. Please let me know if I can do anything else for you, and I'll be happy to help. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:51, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
User:Oshwah I did I have mentioned it in the talk page but no one is replying there that’s why I have come to you for help as no one is willing to. Please look here I have added it in the talk page [25] - have a look — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.13 (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Have you tried pinging other editors who have been involved with modifying and expanding the article? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
User:Oshwah Yes Cyphoid and another user as well. But no response Cyphoid hasn't been active since last month. And i have given the sources in the talk page which are up above — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.13 (talk) 20:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC) User:Oshwah Please could you help me in this please as I have discussed this on the talk page.
User:Oshwah Please could you reply and help and change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.13 (talk) 07:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Just wait until they respond. Someone will get back to you... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:08, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Newark NJ Fire Department Wikipedia Page

Hi, I'm Doriden, Thanks for protecting the page, that ip address user wouldn't stop the nonsense. An extended confirmed user will be able to edit it if and when necessary? Doriden (talk) 18:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Doriden! You're very welcome! Yes, that is correct. An extended-confirmed user has the ability to modify and edit articles and pages that are currently semi-protected. Please let me know if you run into any more questions, and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Thanks for the message, and I wish you a great rest of your day. Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:53, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

TPA

Hello. You might wanna remove TPA from Britneyspearsholditagainstme. --Minorax (talk) 03:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Minorax -  Done. Thanks for the heads up. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Neutral point of view adhered to by edit. Martin will not be working again so the word former is accurate, so is the term disgraced in light of the recent enquiry.

Hello person with the wild hair. I do no login to Wikipedia due to privacy concerns Please tell me my reverted edit was not due to me not logged in? Keep up the great work. David B — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.232.0.11 (talk) 03:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! I reverted your edit here to Martin Bashir because you referred to the person as "disgraced". This adjective is opinionated and adds non-neutral bias to the article. It does not comply with Wikipedia's policy that all articles must be worded to reflect a neutral point of view. Please take some time to review this policy and make sure that you understand it. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Thanks for the message, and I wish you a great rest of your day. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Jason Gray

You changed "Jason Jeffrey Gay (born January 18, 1972), better known by his stage name Jason Gray" to "Jason Jeffrey Gray (born January 18, 1972), better known by his stage name Jason Gray" which makes no sense. The subject's legal name is Jason Gay. I'm not sure why "No" is an appropriate edit summary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

I see the full edit history now. An anon made the change, then self-reverted, and you only reverted the last edit. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Walter Görlitz! Thanks for leaving me a message about this. I thought that the IP user was reverting vandalism and then restored it back. This is why I reverted the change with that edit summary. I guess it's not vandalism, though I would figure that most patrollers would think it would be. If that's the article subject's legal name, then I stand corrected and I apologize for the mistake on my part. Thanks again for the message and for letting me know about this. :-) I appreciate it very much. Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Glad this worked out.
The logic for the stage name change makes perfect sense. An American Evangelical performer in the Christian music industry would certainly be hampered with "Gay" as a family name. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Walter Görlitz - Yeah, and I'm glad you told me - thank you for doing that. If you look at this from a patroller's perspective, I would safely guess that 9/10 of them would probably think that someone changing "Gray" to "Gay" in that article was vandalism. I sure did... LOL. Thanks again for the heads up. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Orh and oad are rajputs

Sir i have requested you to change the deltailed given by someone. Please first check the old books. The oad and orh are kshatriya caste and are belonging to Odisha . They are not daltas or untouchable.they are grand sons of Raja bhagirathi rajput who originated the river ganga MAA. And you guys are giving false statement about that so please don't do thatJitendra mohil (talk) 09:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

About "old books", see WP:RAJ. In general WP will go by new books, but it matters which books. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
  • There's also a similar post on Cullen328's talk page. Perhaps Sitush could shed some light? I think he's pretty knowledgeable in these matters. — Ched (talk) 09:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Jitendra mohil - Is there any reliable source that we can access that supports your changes? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Robert Bropho

This man was a repeat and convicted peodophile. Can you please remove the phrase “loving grandfather”? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.129.11 (talk) 10:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

My case is not listed at WP:SPI

Hi. Would you please fix Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HistoryOfTurkic? Seems something is wrong with it and it may need to be fixed. It's not in the section/table Cases currently listed at SPI on WP:SPI.Wario-Man talk 11:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Wario-Man! I took a look at the SPI case, and everything seems to be in order. I'm not sure why it's not being listed on the SPI case table. Nonetheless, I'll take a look at your SPI request and go from there... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
OK, thanks. Wario-Man talk 11:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Wario-Man - No problem. AmandaNP, could you possibly take a look at this SPI and let me know why it's not showing up on the current SPI cases table at WP:SPI? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Looks like it's because something is wrong with the script. I'll see what I can do. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

About the change in Ivory Coast Under-23 National Football Team

Hi I'm the one that made a change in that page. There was a statement from the KFA that the South Korea Under-23 National Football Team will have 2 friendly matches against the Ghana Under-23 National Football Team on June 12th, and 15th in Seogwipo, Jeju, South Korea. I should have left a message about the change. Anyways thanks for criticizing. LINK : https://www.kfa.or.kr/layer_popup/popup_live.php?act=news_tv_detail&idx=23344&div_code=news&check_url=bGF5ZXI=&lang=KOR — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.255.165.97 (talk) 11:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for letting me know. If you need anything, please don't hesitate to ask. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Hey there friend

Giving you a notification (and all the watchlisters) and taking up some space on your page to just say hello. Been a few years, and hope you are well :) --allthefoxes (Talk) 12:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Allthefoxes! Long time no chat! I hope you're doing well! What've you been up to? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Living life, I suppose. Logging in once every couple months to do a bit of cleanup in some downtime. I'd be surprised if anyone remembered me, considering its been about 5-6 years since my last major activity on the site. I think I'm most known for accidentally posting something embarrassing in a wiki related IRC chat all those years ago! 6 years is a real long time. Different jobs, school, friends, partners. Some new life, some loss. It's all quite a lot when I look back at it. But at the same time, I find it oddly comforting that I could come to a site like here and really not much has changed at all. Something I muse about more than I actually spend time here. Anyways, this is probably not the best venue for idle chit-chat, but it's 6am here and my mind was wandering. Wishing you the best :) --allthefoxes (Talk) 12:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Allthefoxes - Indeed, six years is a long time. A lot of things change in that time. I hope you plan to become active again on Wikipedia. Don't worry, I definitely remember you, and we definitely miss having you here! User talk pages are completely fine for "idle chit-chat"; no need to run away... lol. We're also on IRC and discord if you want to chat there. You must be within the Pacific time zone; it's 6 AM for me as well. :-D I hope that you decide to come back and become active again, and I hope that you stay in touch. I'm around if you run into any questions or need help with anything - don't be a stranger. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I didn't realize that we upgraded from IRC to Discord. Big supporter of that one ;) - I'd love it if you could send me a link. Can you send it here, or should I email you? --allthefoxes (Talk) 13:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Allthefoxes - Email me and I'll send you a link. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Weiss

That’s your call. I won’t argue on whether change was constructive nor try to persuade you in any way for changing or sustaining your decision. I would even restrain from that revert in your place if you yourself state ‘it appears’ to be non-constructive. I was more about factuality than constructiveness here. The guy has been born in the Poland, his parents too, so it is pretty obvoius they all could not bear English name of Mary nor Henry (or Earl!) in then Polish- or Russian-speaking country. I was wondering whether I should also change blatant and simply incorrect information about ‘born as’ name but restrained myself from doing so. Please be more considerate as for your edits. Regards, 2A02:A31A:4040:8780:1D03:F521:BA69:FB24 (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! I'm not sure what happened, but I did not mean to revert the edit you made to Hymie Weiss. I went and restored the edit you made. Please accept my sincere apologies for the mix-up and confusion; I'm not sure how that managed to happen. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything, and I'll be happy to help you. :-) Thank you for leaving me a message about this and for bringing it to my attention. Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
No offence taken (even if I was little bit to bitter in my communication to you—sorry from my side!). Yet I have a request to you: English is not my mother tongue and I thought that if it is for you then the article would gravely benefit from some decent editing and proof-reading. As I mentioned before, I am nor so much into any kind of personal accusations or thing like that. So I’d be more than thankful if you, having some spare time and willingness, would have a look at the article and fix it appropriately where applicable (esp. if English is your first language). Thanks in advance for any subsequent change helping the article. All the best! 2A02:A31A:4040:8780:49E4:D3FC:8F75:5E13 (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks again for being so understanding and for accepting my apologies. Yes, English is my native language. I'll see what I can do regarding the article's text. If you have questions or need anything, please let me know and I'll be happy to help you. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:31, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

folklore Taylor Swift

Why would you remove my edit the name of the album is officially stylizied in all lowercase on all streaming platforms and her website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:d48e:5200:dc71:ca89:af1b:cc17 (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! The reason I reverted your edit to the article was because your modification changed every instance of that album to be lower-case - even in sentences where it should be capitalized (such as the first word of a sentence). If you believe that your changes were good, please feel free to restore the edit you made. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

al-khorasani al-hirawi edit

I didn't provide a source because the source was already provided in the article prior to my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.115.75.143 (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

It says in the article that he was the son of a byzantine born in herat and then proceeds to call him an Arab out of nowhere. Neither heratis (persian) nor byzantines (greek) are Arab, so without any identifiable arab ancestry this was the label placed on him by the article despite contradicting itself. 146.115.75.143 (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for leaving me a message here regarding your edit to Abu Ubaid al-Qasim bin Salam. The reason I reverted your edit was because you changed the ethnicity of the article subject without citing a source. If there is a reference already cited in the article that describes the subject as being Greek, by all means, please accept my apologies and feel free to restore your changes. Otherwise, you will need to cite a reliable source in-line with the content that you're changing. Please see Wikipedia's policy page on verifiability, and please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Thanks again for the message, and I wish you a great day and happy editing. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

wrong about edits kdbs (Katherine Delmar Burke School)

none of that is unsourced, i went there and was in leadership as an alum — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:8300:C6D0:10CE:A185:EEA:CEFE (talk) 15:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

I see you are about to kick me off as a Wikipedia user but I am a reliable source on this which is what the stub wants — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:8300:c6d0:10ce:a185:eea:cefe (talk) 15:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for leaving me a message here regarding your edits (such as this one) to Katherine Delmar Burke School. I'll be more than happy to help you. Don't worry, I'm not about to "kick you off of Wikipedia". :-) If you have questions and need help, I'd much rather help you than block you. :-) Your edits constitute original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. To explain what that is: You cannot "cite yourself" on Wikipedia, nor can you even cite any research, journals, articles, or papers you've written. All content that's added to Wikipedia articles must be attributable or reference a reliable source that's secondary and independent of the article subject. This is why I removed the edit you made to the article. You also referenced Yelp in one of your edits. Yelp is not a reliable source, nor is it secondary. This is another reason as to why I reverted your edits to the article. Please take some time to review and understand the policies and guidelines I've linked you to here. They will provide you with more information and help you. If you have any questions after reviewing those policies and guidelines, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Thanks again for the message, and I wish you a great day. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

WP:DUCK sock?

Seems like WP:DUCK of User:Param.arora (same topic areas, similar summaries). OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ohnoitsjamie! It's nice to talk to you again! I hope you're doing well and that life is good. :-) Have you created an SPI report yet? If not, go ahead and do so, and then let me know. I'll be happy to take a look, but we should definitely open a case so that it's documented. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Ah, I forgot how easy it is to append to an existing report; done. All is well here, thanks, hope the same goes for you! Cheers, OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Ohnoitsjamie - Perfect! I just ran a check on the accounts in the SPI report and posted my findings. Things are busy for me, but I don't have any complaints. At least not right now. ;-). If you need anything else, don't be a stranger. My user talk page is always open to you. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

No subject

Hello, Oshwah. The edit is related to Sunderlal Bahuguna, I removed because there is no any clear evidence that he is related to Bandyopadhyaya cast. If you go through the reference it show 404 error. The reference is also stratified which show not clear evidence that his relation to Bangal. Please check reference. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChauhanA10 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi ChauhanA10 - Thanks for leaving me a message and for letting me know about your edit to the Sunderlal Bahuguna article. If there are issues with the content as it is, please feel free to restore the edit you made to the article. Please accept my apologies for the confusion. In the future, you'll just want to make sure that you add an edit summary with each of your changes so that other editors can understand what you're doing and why. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Thanks again for the message, and I hope you have a great rest of your day. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Kurt Benkert

Why did you edit my update — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.211.35.97 (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! The reason I reverted your edit was because it was not supported by a reliable source. Please see Wikipedia's policy on verifiability, and Wikipedia's guideline on how to cite sources in-line with article content. If you run into any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Oshwah please

Stop saying you will ban me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:1BEB:44A0:0:0:0:2A (talk) 19:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

I’m so sorry!!

I just accidentally rollbacked your edit. I’m so, so, so, so, sorry. I was trying to touch a button next to the rollback button and hit the revert button instead. I’m a clumsy chick with fat fingers. Please forgive me. 🙏🏻 🐍 Helen 🐍 19:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

HelenDegenerate - No problem; it's not a big deal. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Otto Reich page

Hi there,

After your removal of my edit of the Otto Reich profile for "neutrality", under "Political positions and reputation", it states:

A 2002 profile of Reich in The New York Times described him as a "minor celebrity" in Latin America, stating that editorial cartoons in Nicaragua had depicted him "as a Superman-like figure capable of terrorizing corrupt officials and the nation's former Marxist leaders." The state-run media in Cuba, in contrast, referred to him as a "terrorist" and a "mafioso".

Considering that it is unacceptably biased to state who runs The New York Times, I have emboldened above a section that I would consider biased. I will remove it for neutrality, as you did with my edit.

Kindly

Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonggear (talk • contribs) 20:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jonggear! Thanks for leaving me a message regarding your edit to the Otto Reich article. The reason I reverted your edit was because you referred to the New York Times as being "billionaire-run", something that's not necessary and can imply a bias with the article's content. Remember that Wikipedia's articles must be written to reflect a neutral point of view. If you feel that there are other terms that add bias or non-neutrality to the article, please feel free to fix them. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Thanks again for the message, and I wish you a great rest of your day. Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

i am so sorry and regretful

Hi Mr Oshwah,You banned my Ip adress.I know i opened some fake accounts but i am very regretful now.Please give me a change,I promise I will not do it again. I applied for unblocking request but other admins denied but i hope you will give me a change.What i must do for unblocking? I apologize again. You already know my IP adress. I will not make any mistake again. My IP adress: [REDACTED - Oshwah] — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASHLEYWON11 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi ASHLEYWON11! Thanks for leaving me a message here. I checked the IP address you provided in your message above, and it is not blocked from editing. Were you perhaps referring to another IP address or account? Can you link me to the page where your unblock requests are being denied? As a general rule, you want to appeal your block and have it be accepted, or wait until the block expires before you continue to edit. I'm more than happy to help you, but we need to make sure that you're following the rules. If you could provide me a link to your user talk page where your unblock requests are, I'll be able to help you. Thanks! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Of course,check Wikiazeus's talk page.I swear that you will follow the rules from now on. All I want to do is correct any minor mistakes in articles affiliated with my country.I hope you give me a chance — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASHLEYWON11 (talk • contribs) 07:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
ASHLEYWON11 - Wow... That user talk page is full of unblock requests, and your last one was very unsurprisingly denied and with your user talk page access revoked. "You and your wikipedia is trash"? I really hope you understand why your unblock requests were denied, especially when I see an unblock request that starts with a statement like that. Creating accounts to get around your block is a violation of policy. What you're doing right now is only going to get you blocked and complicate your ability to be unblocked and return to editing. You should know that Wikipedia has a standard offer. If you abstain from violating policy (like creating sock accounts), we'll generally unblock your account if you request an unblock in six months. Your user talk page access is revoked due to... well, you know... So you'll need to request an unblock by contacting Wikipedia using their unblock ticketing request system. If you have any more questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. You need to stop creating sock puppet accounts and follow Wikipedia's guidelines if you wish to be truly unblocked without feeling like you're hiding under the radar... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Dee Dee Warwick

Hello. I research the music and life of Dee Dee Warwick. Based on the information collected, I created a website for her. Both sources are only available for money.

1) Dee Dee Warwick began her musical career as a background vocalist in 1961. These are her own words https://www.thehistorymakers.org/biography/dee-dee-warwick-41 https://da.thehistorymakers.org/story/283507 - Dee Dee Warwick recalls singing backup with the Gospelaires https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dZgjiFQYUIpLVTbe0GlAX_zrm5AXjpqh/view?usp=sharing - My copy of this video 'So you go backstage and you meet someone. Who did you meet?

Well, actually the man who came to see the Drinkard Singers, to do a background for Nappy Brown, the blues singer.

Who is Nappy Brown?

Nappy Brown was a big-time blues singer, like Muddy Waters, or like that. He was really a very popular man. And the Drinkards couldn't come, of course, because they were on the stage doing the show at the Apollo [Theater, New York, New York]. So, they sent us. And from that point we met Ozzie Cadena, who was an engineer at Savoy Records [Newark, New Jersey], which was where Nappy did his recordings. And they kept hiring us. We did Sam the Man Taylor, we did Dave Brubeck, we did--oh my Lord, so many--Herbie Mann, a lot of things, yeah.

So that was the start of your professional career? You were being paid?

It was the beginning of our background singing professionally, yeah.

So who was all the background singers at that time? It was you--

Well, it was me, Dionne [HistoryMaker Dionne Warwick], Myrna [Smith], Estelle--I forgot to mention her, Estelle Brown--and Sylvia [Shemwell] again. Basically, that was the group.

And singing--what sort of--what is a background singer?

Background singers supply a feel or a lick, you know. A lick is like (singing), you know, we support the lead singer. And the lead singer can respond off of us. So, we fill in where the gaps are, backing them up (laughter).

So you're at Savoy, and you're doing a lot of backup work. About what year did it really take off for you?

Sixty-one [1961], '61 [1961] or '62 [1962], somewhere in there.

Now, what happened in '61 [1961] that made it take off?

Well, they had heard of us, and New York [New York] called. Who was that who called us? I can't remember who exactly that was. Maybe Atlantic Records [New York, New York]--Jerry Wexler, Bert Berns, or [Steve] Greenberg at Mercury Records. And he wanted us to do something with Quincy Jones at Mercury Records with what's that girl's name? Connie Francis, and Elvis [Presley]. So it just snowballed from there, and we made a lot of money, you know.'

I put together a Spotify playlist based on a catalog of records from discogs.com. I listened to all the songs from 1961 to 1970 by Atlantic, Savoy and Mercury. http://www.soulwalking.co.uk/Dee%20Dee%20Warwick.html, https://rateyourmusic.com/artist/dee-dee-warwick/credits/, https://www.theguardian.com/music/2008/oct/28/dee-dee-warwick-obituary I can put together links for you where she is referred to as a background vocalist.

Dee Dee Warwick has recorded background vocals for hundreds of songs for: Nina Simone, Esther Phillips, Betty Harris, Maxine Brown, Judy Clay, Connie Francis, Van Morrison, Dinah Washington, Little Richard, Solomon Burke, Garnet Mimms, Wilson Pickett, Ben E. King, The Drifters, Aretha Franklin, Dionne Warwick, Elvis Presley, LaVern Baker, Chuck Jackson, Jimmy Radcliffe, Tommy Hunt, Jimmy Jules, Rudy Lewis, Nappy Brown, Sam The Man Taylor, Joan Toliver, Buddy Lucas, Kai Winding, Jackie Verdell etc

2) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/music/artists/dee-dee-warwick-troubled-talented-cousin-may-have-ruined-whitney/ 'Openly gay in the music industry, and known only as Dionne Warwick’s sister outside of it, Warwick was the toughest daughter of the matriarchal, star-making family - and its least famous creation. Rumoured to have struggled with addiction, Warwick suffered from rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes before her death.'

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K_6b5-GO9yUbf7dhyXNt7kugSgL7yWwa/view?usp=sharing - My copy of article I ask you to indicate her alleged illnesses, as Dee Dee is described as a drug addict all the time. She used drugs in the late 70s and 80s. So she led a secluded life, they make a degraded drug addict out of her. But she was not like that!

3) The photo I put on the cover of this article is Dee Dee's favorite photo. This photo stood on her piano. Dee Dee Warwick recalls singing backup with the Gospelaires - You can see this photo on a video about the background vocals

Dee Dee Warwick narrates her photographs https://da.thehistorymakers.org/story/283736 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mRR2MOGoa5OA_sS86pEhoupQwbVP6YmW/view?usp=sharing - My copy of this video 'Hi, I'm [HistoryMaker] Dee Dee Warwick. That's me sitting right there. That picture you see represented my promotional package. And I guess it must have been late '60s [1960s]. And taken by (unclear) who did all of the stars' photographs. He's an excellent photographer.'

Thank you for your time. Best regards, Yulia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yesemenova (talk • contribs) 20:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Yesemenova! Thanks for leaving me a message here. I have concerns regarding the sources you're using. You stated in your message that you created a website regarding this person. You're not referencing that website, are you? That would be original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. So long as you're referencing reliable sources that are secondary and independent of the article subject (and yourself), you should be just fine. Feel free to go back to the article and restore the changes you made. Just make sure that you cite your references in-line. If you need help with any of this, please let me know and I'll be happy to lend a hand. Please also let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Thanks again for the message, and I wish you a great day. Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Nunzio Randazzo

The author blanked the page with this edit, and I see no reason to doubt their good-faith. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 21:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Ah! You're right! Thank you! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Kurt benkert

Not sure what I need to do I added his mom and it got taken off — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.253.118.49 (talk) 23:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! See Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. You need to cite a reliable source to support the content that you're adding. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

No subject

I am very sorry, at first I received news that I was dead in the morning, but according to the latest information there is nothing clear I have been searching the soldiers in Nigeria, now I realized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 06Efe (talk • contribs) 23:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi 06Efe! Thanks for the message. No worries; it's been fixed and you've been educated on the matter - that's what's important. Just make sure that you cite a reliable source when you add content like that to an article - especially articles that are biographies of living persons. Other than that, mistakes will happen and they're a normal part of learning. It's not a big deal to make mistakes; just make sure that you learn from them and use those mistakes as opportunities to improve and grow. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:51, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocking of JKC68413

In your block notice here, it looks like you made a capitalization error that didn't actually prevent the user from editing Lady Gaga's page. They're still making changes to it because of this being applied to a redirect instead. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:43, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi SNUGGUMS! Good call! Thanks for letting me know -  Fixed. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Not a problem! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

About the Ivory Coast Under 23 National Football Team page's change(With an ID)

Hi I'm the one that made a change in that page. There was a statement from the KFA that the South Korea Under-23 National Football Team will have 2 friendly matches against the Ghana Under-23 National Football Team on June 12th, and 15th in Seogwipo, Jeju, South Korea. I should have left a message about the change. Anyways thanks for criticizing. LINK : https://www.kfa.or.kr/layer_popup/popup_live.php?act=news_tv_detail&idx=23344&div_code=news&check_url=bGF5ZXI=&lang=KOR

+I had no intentions to make you pissed off, but if I made you upset, I'll apologize. And I should have left a message by my ID. If this message is still inappropriate for an additional change, please tell me. I'll try my best to change. I had no intentions for any kinds of vandalism. I hope you would read my message. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willharrisonlee (talk • contribs) 05:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Willharrisonlee! Welcome to Wikipedia! Your edit didn't "piss me off" at all. :-) I was just concerned because your edit removed content from the article without explaining why. In the future, you just want to make sure to add an edit summary with each edit you make. It helps explain to other editors what you're doing and why. Feel free to make the change that you wish to the article. If you have any questions or need help with anything, please don't hesitate to let me know. I'll be more than happy to help you. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Rfa

Nominate onel5969 for rfa, he deserves it.103.42.172.159 (talk) 06:28, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) As far as I know (and I could be wrong, it happens!), Onel hasn't been interested since Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Onel5969 didn't go through, although that was some time back and things may have well have changed since. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

TPA

Hello Oshwah, sorry to bother you. Is it possible to revoke the talk page access of Justinbieberfan999, whom you blocked recently? --Ashleyyoursmile! 08:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ashleyyoursmile! No need to apologize; you're not bothering me at all. :-)  Done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much, Oshwah. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 08:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Ashleyyoursmile - No problem; always happy to help! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:14, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
I suspect in about three hours' time, you could say "Why can't you just do it yourself?" :-) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:10, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Ritchie333 - Indeed! Ashleyyoursmile, I'll offer you my congratulations right now. If you need help with anything, please know that I'm always happy to lend a hand and provide input. Congrats! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Oshwah, I just wanted to say thank you for trusting me enough with the extended rights last year. I wouldn't have thought that I could do more if you hadn't granted me rollback back then and wouldn't have been able to engage in counter-vandalism like I do now. I really appreciate your kind gesture. P.S. also letting you know that I will drop by if I have any questions. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 03:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Ashleyyoursmile - You're very welcome! I'm happy that you stuck around and that you enjoy what you're doing on Wikipedia. Now that you're an administrator, you have the ability to pass the kindness on and be an example of what Wikipedia is about. I couldn't be more proud! Yes, please don't be a stranger! If you run into any questions with the administrator tools, please let me know. I'll be more than happy to give you input, advice, and guidance should you ever need it. :-) I think you'll do well with the tools. Your RFA went a hell of a lot better than mine... lol ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Devoleena

User:Oshwah please could you change it to her correct birth year which is 1990 as in these sources it’s says her age (26 in 2016), 27 which does say she was born in 1990 and the last two also says her 1990 date of birth year whilst the other birth year has only one source which was wrong. There are more sources of her saying she was born in 1990 than the other. Have a look here

[26][27] it says here she was 28 in 2018. [28] [29] [30] please correct her right date of birth I am disappointed I added it in the talk page and no admin is bothered to reply this is very wrong as here in Wikipedia it says they add the correct information but here you have not and are adding the wrong date of birth year for her. So please I highly request you to please add her correct birth year as I have given the right sources saying about it. So please do it User:Oshwah — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.13 (talk) 11:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! The reason that the birthdate was removed from the article was because it's been pointed out on the article's talk page that multiple sources are giving different birthdates. You need to discuss this on the article's talk page and come to a consensus with the other editors involved. Once that is done, the article can be updated by any account that is confirmed. Please let me know if you have any questions about what consensus is, and I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern

Anything we can do about this, seeing as the user is removing material that is reliably sourced to Deutsche Welle and the BBC? [31] My attempts to pour cold water on the situation have only led to this. [32] Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Amanuensis Balkanicus! Thanks for leaving me a message here regarding the removal of content by Geronimo1131 at the Roland Bartetzko article. I'll be happy to point you in the right direction. This looks to be a content-related dispute, so you'll want to start a discussion on the article's talk page and ping them in the discussion. I'd also let them know on their user talk page and link them to it. I do note that there were some quotes in the content removed that were not cited by a source. Nonetheless, you need to discuss the content with the user and come to a consensus. You can then modify the article to reflect that consensus. See Wikipedia's bold, revert, discuss guidelines, as well as Wikipedia's dispute resolution protocol for more information. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry and please this is a request

User:Oshwah I have now changed my decision as because I have realised her birth year was 1985 because first in this source (I know it’s not a reliable one) but it’s says her dad passed away in 1997 which was said by Devoleena herself [33] and also in Her freinds post from 2017 it she said it was her 30th birthday [34] please could you fix this and add her 1985 birth year as many people are getting upset over this. Please I am requesting you to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.13 (talk) 14:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Here are the other sources we can use for this actual correct birth year 1985 this source — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.13 (talk) 14:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! The birthdate of Devoleena Bhattacharjee was removed due to an inconsistency between references with her actual date of birth. For the birthdate to be added back to the article, reliable sources must be cited, and a consensus among those discussing the article subject's date of birth must be reached. According to the discussion on the article's talk page, there appears to be disagreement with the date of birth. This needs to be worked out. Please join the discussion and provide the references you found (if you haven't already done so). If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks again for the message, and I wish you a great weekend. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
User:Oshwah here in Devoleena freind Rucha Hasabnis post it says it was her 30th birthday so it exactly means her real date of birth is 1985 and not 1990 the sources for 1990 are wrong. Freinds will never lie about their loved ones age so it should now stay with 1985 please I will get the reliable sources together for her birth year 1985 and also Fizconiz doesn’t understand this so don’t take him seriously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.120.138.152 (talk) 09:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Friends might not lie, but they're not reliable sources. You can certainly mention it on the article's talk page if you wish - this is where you need to discuss the matter. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked May 19 - disruptive

Was it formatting errors or content? Not sure what violation was, thanks, vdubber 68.4.48.147 (talk) 15:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! I'm not sure what block you're referencing - perhaps you were on a different IP address range? I checked your IP range using our tools, and your current IP address has never been blocked, nor has your IP range. The best recommendation that I can give you is to register and use an account. Using an account gives you many benefits and advantages, including the ability to edit Wikipedia while using an IP address that is currently blocked (with the exception of hard blocks). If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Have a great weekend! Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Oshwah, thanks for the kind reply. I sent a brief note, perhaps inadequate. The block is Block ID #10571349 on Joel Osteen wiki page. I was trying to add core beliefs. Not sure exactly what rule(s) I have not upheld, but I obviously haven’t followed the rules. Thanks for your help. Vdubber 2600:8802:4300:45:F0FD:FD4D:FF9B:2ABB (talk) 06:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
You're very welcome. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

The third world model vs the third world.

The maoist third world is not the same as the non aligned countries movement, and it should be reflected as such. 3rd world does not meed underdeveloped or poor, switzerland, sweden, finland qatar and bahrein are all in the third world in the proper sense. in the maoist they are in the 1st. portugal, mexico and turkey are all 1st world as members of NATO but poorer than many 3rd world countries in the proper term, whilst in maoist terms mexico would be a 2nd world country.

I think it is important to make a distinction either way.

/Vardek Petrovic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.35.202.226 (talk) 22:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! The reason that I reverted your edit here to Three-world model because you changed the word "generally" to the word "inaccurately". It's not up to us to form opinions or add commentary to articles. Articles need to be worded to reflect a neutral point of view, and should be free of such adjectives that imply that we're adding a bias or opinion. This is why I reverted your change. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

hey

Not nice why did u channge my edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:194:380:a3f0:c1de:7e3a:d6d9:4a8c (talk • contribs) 22:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

You mean this edit? Why do you think I removed it? ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Måneskin

Do you think this page needs protection? I've had to request protection at RPP recently, even though this type of disruption is to be expected following a big event, in this case, a Eurovision win. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi JalenFolf! I've added semi-protection to the article for two days. If any more vandalism or disruption happens after the protection expires, let me know. I'll extend it to be longer. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Harvey Weinstein

Hi, thanks for your help on Harvey Weinstein. However, I'm a little concerned that the protection you put in isn't long enough. This page was semi-protected for a month little more than a month ago in March and April and vandalism has been pretty prevalent in this article for awhile. Would you please consider making the protection longer? Especially since this is a BLP. Ethanian (talk) 23:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ethanian! Probably not a bad idea to extend the protection. If anything, it can be extended when it expires and if more vandalism occurs. Just keep an eye on things and let me know. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Interesting usernames

What to do with these accounts?

EDIT: Drmies, is this some LTA? I see that you checkuser blocked two of them. aeschylus (talk) 00:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Aeschylus - Drmies beat me to it, but we've handled the situation. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
@Oshwah, so just to clarify, is this a random user or some LTA? May be useful to track such usernames in the future. aeschylus (talk) 00:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Aeschylus - There were lots of other accounts. I'm not sure who the LTA or sock master was, but we've blocked the IP associated with all of them. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
@Oshwah, good to know. aeschylus (talk) 00:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Aeschylus - If you see any more shenanigans like this, definitely don't be stranger - let me know. I'll be happy to take care of it. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
@Oshwah, do the pages they created qualify for deletion per DENY? aeschylus (talk) 01:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Aeschylus - I took a look at their contributions, and they didn't create any pages, so we're good there. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:10, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
@Oshwah, it was one of the socks (who I won't name); see the block log; but as Drmies deleted them, we're all good here. aeschylus (talk) 01:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
I only blocked a couple of them, out of a dozen or so? but yeah, that one name that I saw was good enough to run CU. You can see a few more names in my log. BTW I have some idea of who this might be but I'm not sure. Drmies (talk) 01:05, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Censorship of Violence, Call to Violence, Terrorism, Criminal Activity

Why are you censoring calls to violence, and history of violence, factual and true references in published, high-grade media sources, for your own biases? This is wrong. You will be addressed and given consequences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iqacquire (talk • contribs) 03:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

If we are to censor something, calls to violence sounds like a jolly good idea. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah,Newsroom is a Tabloid NZ media company and the statements you have reinstated are factually incorrect and subject to pending litigation

Newsroom is a Tabloid NZ media company .Three Newsroom journalists were jailed by police in Suva Fiji https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/04/04/521015/newsroom-journalists-detained-in-fiji

and Tim Murphy the Editor of Newsroom is currently under a criminal investigation by New Zealand Police https://www.newsroom.co.nz/police-open-investigation-into-newsroom — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.29.42 (talk) 03:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! What article are you referring to that needs to be fixed? Can you link me to it? I don't know what article you're referring to... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

What does a page being reviewed mean?

Does it mean the admin who reviewed it will delete it? I am scared of my user being deleted now. Artmaker12 (talk)

Hi Artmaker12! Welcome to Wikipedia! The notice you probably received was referring to the fact that I marked the user page you created as patrolled. There's nothing to be scared about. :-) All new pages that get created are subject to be reviewed to make sure that they're in compliance with Wikipedia's policies. If they're not, they'll be nominated for deletion. In this case, your user page is fine. Even if it wasn't and if it got deleted, that doesn't mean that your account or anything else gets deleted. :-) Please let me know if you have any more questions and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) Again, I welcome you to Wikipedia and I hope you have a great day! Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Amapiano

You got to it before I could but this edit actually appears to be a copy from this article. Notfrompedro (talk) 22:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Notfrompedro! Thanks for the message and for letting me know. I've revision deleted the edit. Please let me know if you see any more shenanigans like this and I'll be happy to take care of it. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Will do! Notfrompedro (talk) 22:33, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject merger

Hey, I had brought this to you on IRC a few days ago. I just want to make sure you haven't forgotten. Could you please close and determine consensus for the discussion at WPTC? There are some additional related comments here. Thanks. NoahTalk 01:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Hurricane Noah! Does this still need to be looked at? I've been busy with real life, and I'm just now getting caught up with all of my messages here... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Yes, it does. NoahTalk 00:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Hurricane Noah - Okay. I'll try and look at it this week. I have a lot of Wikipedia messages and emails to catch up on, and I have quite a bit of Wikipedia tasks on my to-do list. I apologize for the delay getting back to you about the discussion. Life has been keeping me busy. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Just reaching out ... with a question...

Hi, Oshwah...

Grateful to "meet" you via the talk page.

If it is at all possible, once my "sandbox" goes live (still refining the draft), I'd welcome your comments. I'm part of that Smithsonian Cohort and though the training has been beyond excellent, I could use your input down the line.

That is, if you're willing ... I'm still very much a "newbie" in this universe.

Thanks and best regards,

Denise — Preceding unsigned comment added by DLMCIVER (talk • contribs) 04:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi DLMCIVER! Welcome to Wikipedia! Sure, I'll be happy to answer any questions you have and help you. Just let me know what questions you run into. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

How do you do?

Hello Oshwah,
This is Interstellarity. How are you doing? I haven't talked to you in so long. I have been moderately active on Wikipedia, although I have been heavily focused on my life outside Wikipedia. How are you doing during the pandemic now that the world is getting vaccinated? Do you still have to wear masks in your area? I would like to know what you have been up to in 2021. Interstellarity (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Interstellarity! Long time no chat! Thing have been good for me. I live in an area where the impact of COVID is low, so it didn't affect me too much. I still need to go get my vaccination though. Yes, masks are still required in my area, but I'm not too worried about it. Things are coming back slowly but surely. :-) I'm working a full time job and trying to stay active on Wikipedia as well. How have you been doing? How's life been for you? :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Life has been good for me!! Things are slowly getting back to normal. I got fully vaccinated. I’m busy with school in the summer and fall. Aside from that, I do have free time so hopefully I’ll edit here once in a while. I can assure you that brighter days are ahead and hope we are getting out of this crisis soon. Thanks for responding!! It always helps to know how people are doing. Interstellarity (talk) 12:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Interstellarity - That's awesome! I'm glad you're fully vaccinated and that life is going well for you! Keep up in school and do well there. Your friends will change, your interests will change, and your activities will change - your GPA won't. ;-) I remember how sudden things changed when I graduated from college; it's a very big change, so prepare for that. I think you'll do well, though. Your attitude and your life seem to be going well. That's important - especially for your particular stage in life. :-) I've been trying my best to stay active here, but life is keeping me quite busy. Keep in touch, and definitely don't hesitate to swing by and say hello! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Blablubbs. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, User:The Muslim Boy, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

--Blablubbs|talk 16:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Blablubbs - Heh, thanks for the heads up. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Okay, now I am officially highly confused. This is the second time this has happened, and the second time that it happened with you – I'm almost 100% sure I did not unreview that page. I'll try to figure out what's going on with that, but in any case, sorry for the unnecessary notification. --Blablubbs|talk 08:40, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs - No worries! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Talk Archive(s)

I have a favor: can you please archive the talk page of the IP known as 47.16.146.238? No new comments were released since October 1, 2019 almost two years ago. The last user who commented there was OhKayeSierra who as of late is semi-retired. Because of these all discussions are considered stale like moldy bread. Thanks for your consideration.

67.81.161.226 (talk) 01:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

(Talk page enjoyer) what prevents you from doing so? I would just blank the page instead of creating an archive, the page history is all that's necessary. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! I try not to archive the user talk pages of others. I leave it up to them to manage their own pages. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:32, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Newark NJ fire dept Wikipedia page

Oshwah, hi this is Doriden, some BOT removed page protection from the page yesterday and 2 hours later that non-static ip from St.Petersburg Florida went at it fast and furiously. Please help me out, this guy blocked, at least temporarily for now. I would greatly appreciate your assistance. It's kind of difficult to do with a mobile device. Thanks, Doriden Doriden (talk) 13:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)@Doriden: You don't need to make duplicate sections. WP:AIV is the best place if you need a quick response; WP:RFPP if the page needs protection; and WP:ANI if you need a more complex solution (range-blocks, non-obvious vandalism, ...) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:25, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Doriden! Sure, I can take a look. What article or page is it? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Suggestions for Wiki Article

Hi Oshwah!

I am a student who is new to Wikipedia. One of my courses consists of editing and updating the Geophilus flavus Wikipedia page, I noticed you've made some edits on the Centipede wiki, and I was hoping you could provide me with some feedback or suggestions for the Geophilus flavus article.

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!:)

Witchruby (talk) 01:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Witchruby! Sure, I'll be happy to help! It looks like it could use some overall expansion and some research. What do you plan on expanding? Some advice I can give is to figure out what you want to expand on the article first, then do research, gather your sources (make sure that they're reliable), and then expand the article last. If you need ideas, there's plenty of information in the your first article page. I'd give it a read. If you have any more questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you further. Good luck! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Help?

Hi. Sorry to bother you on a weekend. I tried pinging you in a discussion here. But the editor on that talk page immediately deleted my comment (and ping). Can you help, or suggest an admin who can? Thanks. --2603:7000:2143:8500:C84A:1CF1:CBD5:345A (talk) 22:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! Sorry for the late response. I've been busy in real life and I'm just now getting caught up with all of my messages here. What seems to be the underlying issue. You stated to him that you stand behind your comment, but what happened? What's going on? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Interesting usernames (episode 2)

See these names. I am 100% sure this is an LTA, as there are over 50 attack names against Sheena Parker created in 3 months and some are globally locked. One last month was even globally suppressed by TonyBallioni as it contained an address. What to do with this new surge of names?

aeschylus (talk) 01:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Aeschylus! Sorry for the late reply. I'm just now getting caught up with all of my messages here after being busy in real life. It looks like the accounts have all been blocked, and I would also believe that this user is an LTA or someone abusing multiple accounts in bad faith based off the similarity of the usernames. If anything else needs to be done, let me know and I'll be happy to help. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:41, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Revdel Request

Could you revdel Special:AbuseLog/30080366 per WP:RD#2? Thank you! NonsensicalSystem(error?)(.log) 09:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

@NonsensicalSystem, (talk page stalker) I don't think this really fits the criteria for revdel. It's just plain vandalism and isn't really "grossly insulting". Also, revdel requests should be made privately (by email or at #wikipedia-en-revdel connect) to avoid triggering the Streisand effect, which means that it will innately draw more attention. This is especially true here, as it is a highly visited talk page. Hope this helped, aeschylus (talk) 12:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi NonsensicalSystem! Edit filters right now can only be oversighted, which it doesn't meet the criteria for. Though I can oversight vandalism and things that rev deletion fails to remove and where normal administrative measures are insufficient (per OS guideline #5), I don't think that OS is necessary here, though I would completely agree that revision deletion under RD2 would qualify here. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Revdel?

Hi Oshwah. Some of these edit summaries, and one of the edits, strike me as BLP violations. I'm involved with respect to that piece of content, so I was wondering if you'd evaluate them. Best, Vanamonde (Talk) 12:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Vanamonde93. I trust your judgment.  Done. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Brown Line (CTA)

Recent IP addresses at Brown Line (CTA) needs a rangeblock, same unsourced disruption after last block. Cards84664 13:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cards84664! Thanks for letting me know. I've added pending changes protection to the article to stop the unsourced changes. The changes were happening quite a bit, but over a period of time where pending changes protection can be applied. Please let me know if I can do anything else for you. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Hair today, gone tomorrow

I really appreciated your offer of mentorship, even if I didn't take much advantage of it like I should have. But now I think it's time for me to officially graduate from being an adoptee.[35] WanderingWanda🐮👑 (talk) 05:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi WanderingWanda! Sure, no problem. I'm glad to have been given the opportunity to help you and mentor you. Just know that my user talk page is always open to you, and you're welcome to message me any time you need or want to. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Another sockpuppet

Hi: Remember this? Well, here you have this one. Thanks in advance.--Fixertool (talk) 12:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fixertool! Uh oh! Thanks, I'll take a look. If you believe that these are the same person, please file a report at SPI. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks

Is there any way that we can put a block on Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks for people who are not confirmed users?. There is someone who keeps using anonymous logins and is adding information which is not sourced and is also not true. Cronulla and Penrith are not rivals in sport, I have been following Rugby League all my life and never heard of this rivalry before. I am pretty sure it is the same person behind this and I have asked them repeatedly not to keep adding it.Sully198787 (talk) 21:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sully198787! Thanks for the message. It looks like the article has been protected, so the issue is resolved. Sorry for the delay responding to you. I've been busy in real life and I'm just now responding to messages that were left for me here. If you need anything else, please let me know and I'll be happy to help! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:11, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Oshwah/TalkPageArchives/2021-05&oldid=1142130913"