User:Oshwah/TalkPageArchives/2016-03

WikiProject New Orleans Saints
	The Saints logo
Category	New Orleans Saints
Parent; project(s)	National Football League

You are currently viewing an archive of Oshwah's user talk page from March 2016. Please do not modify this page.

These discussions are no longer active and were moved here for historical and record-keeping purposes. If you need to respond to a discussion from here, please create a new discussion on my user talk page and with a link to the archived discussion here so I can easily follow, and we'll be able to pick up where we left off no problem.

Were you trying to send me a message? No worries. Just click here to go the correct page.

No subject

Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.34.223.233 (talk) 03:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Did you need help with anything? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit reversion on "The Americans"

Hi,

I changed Jennings' to Jenningses because Jenningses is the proper plural form of Jennings. That's the only reason.

Thanks.

32.215.197.23 (talk) 03:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 32.215.197.23 - I see what you meant to do. No worries; I think that the original formatting was correct however. But I appreciate the message and for letting me know about the edit. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Google Chrome user who tried to edit due to having the John Oliver extension

Sorry about the edit that was caused by the Google Chrome extension from Last Week Tonight With John Oliver that I downloaded earlier today. I was trying to add the show to the game show genre when it caused the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VoteOpusNBill2016 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Damn, beat me to the punch.

Blast you youngsters! HalfShadow 03:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, HalfShadow! HA! Thanks, that gave me a good laugh :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Bailey House Museum

Aloha, I'm attempting to make updates to the Bailey House Museum page because The Maui Historical Society is changing the official name of the museum to Hale Hoike'ike. All references should now reflect this change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maui Historical Society (talk • contribs) 04:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Change to Minnesota Timberwolves page

Under the individual awards sections there is a slot for slam dunk contest winners, I removed the entry about Gerald Green winning it in 2007 because although he did win it that year it was not with the Minnesota Timberwolves it was with the Boston Celtics, I noticed a message saying that my deletion had been undone and that entry was put back in place, just wanted to inform you that it was incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.129.55.192 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion - Chris Layland

Hi! I suggested the speedy deletion for Christian Layland under WP:N that you removed, on the basis of a Google News search shows a single news source referring to the subject in the context of the article's main claim to notability (a football podcast), and no News or Scholar archive results. Further, the majority of the external links (thefootballsack.com) are from the website of the article's subject. I still think it fails the WP:N criteria, but I'm not sure whether to nominate for deletion under the AfD process, or whether a suggestion that it be merged with an article about said blog - any advice for a new editor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiredgrad (talk • contribs) 04:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Tiredgrad! You're actually in luck! I just explained Wikipedia's speedy deletion guidelines over on PaulAshford's talk page. This will answer your questions, and provide you with the documentation you need. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Oshwah! Have nominated under the AfD process :) Tiredgrad (talk) 04:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Tiredgrad! You bet! I'm glad my response was able to point you in the right direction! Do not hesitate to give me a shout if you need help with anything else. I'll be more than happy to lend a hand :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hello I'm new and I wish to make a wiki page about myself. Is that possible? Everest.Andrew (talk) 04:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Everest.Andrew, thanks for leaving me a message with your question. Is it technically possible? Yes. Your account is not going to prevent you from doing so (so long as it's autoconfirmed). Is it okay to do? No. You should read Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest. Editing articles where you have a conflict of interest is highly discouraged behavior. It doesn't allow you to edit in a neutral point of view. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

ow chore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swanold (talk • contribs) 09:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

the power of five

i have changed the plot overview as it was giving away too much of the story and was a spoiler but i did accidently delete it before but now it is good thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.189.138.44 (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit of cultural fraternities

hi! this is my first time, can you explain why its not contructive? i just wanted my fraternity linked on the list. Rickeyhuynh (talk) 10:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Rickeyhuynh. Please accept my apologies. It looks like I reverted your change by mistake. I've gone ahead and removed the warning and verified that your changes were restored. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi Oswah,

I've recently made some changes to Garage Magazine's page – while explaining and using citations of any changes that I have made – and you have deleted them all, reverting the page back to its original state. Please may I ask why? If I have made any mistakes I will be more than happy to explain.

(Most information and imagery on the page was out of date, quite considerably. I was trying to bring the page back into relevance.)

Ashley1091 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashley1091 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Citation Doubt

Hey. I made the page and paraphrased it myself so the page hasn't been deleted. But there are parts of my page that say 'citation needed' and 'where?'. How do I remove those and can I provide a link to any site that gives the same information about the awards? Oishid3006 (talk) 05:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Oishani

Format

Hey senior user, I just wanted to know that can I Pleasssseee borrow your format? not the whole! Just the one in which it's written click here to send me a message! No problem if you are not willing to!--Field Marshal Putin (talk) 18:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Fuck Me Pumps edit

I am not a very experienced Wikipedia editor, but what I edited on the Fuck Me Pumps page was from http://www.ew.com/article/2007/11/10/frank that review from Entertainment Weekly. If you would please add the quote (the last in the review) to the article and cite it, that would be excellent. 75.97.50.254 (talk) 03:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)David Fathom

Hi, 75.97.50.254 - I reverted your edit to Fuck Me Pumps because it didn't appear to be representing a neutral point of view. If it was from a source, then just make sure that you include the source and make sure to quote the source so that it doesn't appear to be commentary, but quoted from a source. Please let me know if you need anything else! Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Message about edit on Peter Popoff

Hi - you sent me a message about an edit on a Peter Popoff. I didn't edit this page as I never even heard of him.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.86.110.68 (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

If you're using a shared IP address (on a public network), you may want to consider creating an account for yourself to avoid receiving warnings from other people. This will resolve your concerns. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Eric Brewer

Eric Brewer was an enforcer in his days so you don't know what your talking about. Sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hockey Mod (talk • contribs) 03:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

How to speedy delete an article you're the author of

Thanks for deleting the article I marked with a db|1=author tag. What is the correct process? This page was not very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chursaner (talk • contribs) 04:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Chursaner! Again, I welcome you to Wikipedia with open arms and an open talk page. You're more than welcome to message me here at any time with any questions or requests for help. I fixed the page that you linked; it looks like someone removed the text from the essay and it was never fixed. I'll look into it more and figure out why that happened. You were actually very close! you had put {{db|1=author}} on the top of the page you created; it just needed to be {{db-author}} instead. So you were on the right track! I apologize if the essay you provided was confusing, but it should be fixed now :-). Please do not hesitate to leave me a message if you have any more questions or if you need more help. I'll be happy to give you a hand! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! That was me that deleted the text.. I read somewhere that making the page blank was one way to get a speedy deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chursaner (talk • contribs) 16:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct in that blanking the article or page you created yourself will prompt another editor to tag the article for G7. However, it's usually better if you add the tag yourself (if possible), as it will save other editors time. No worries, though! You're new, and being bold is what Wikipedia is all about! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I need your help with a user

Hello, I have been reviewing a user's contributions, and I have noticed that they have been changing or adding unnecessary racial and religious identities to people within the articles. The user is anonymous, and has made numerous changes. The user's IP is 74.95.112.141. If it is not too much trouble, would you review the contributions? HowlingAngel (talk) 05:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, HowlingAngel! Sure can! Are there any specific articles or diffs that I should know about? This will point me in the right direction. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes. Since the user has changed so many, if you do find the changes to be unnecessary, you may want to review the user's contributions page. However, I'll provide some of the articles here.

Timeline of nursing history , History of surgery , Donald Soffer , Daniel Hale Williams

I reverted the edit on Daniel Hale Williams. If it was not a correct action, please undo it. I hope this helps, and thanks for helping me! HowlingAngel (talk) 05:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I think your reversion was correct, as the picture clearly isn't of an African-American person. It could have been an honest mistake though; remember to assume good faith. Were there other examples that you reverted? This IP has made a lot of contributions; it'll be hard to go through every single one. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

There are some other examples. On the page Timeline of nursing history there seems to be some changes that are not exactly reliable. The problem, however, is the user made multiple changes to the article in separate sequences, making it hard to tell what information should be reviewed. Some of the information looks as if it's unsourced, while parts of the timeline have been removed, or events changed. HowlingAngel (talk) 06:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hey. sources was provided in both Brahmanbaria District and Akhaura Upazila page. But after all whats the reason to delete? Can you please explain? Bangla1234 (Bangla124|talk) (EST) 3:25 March 2016.

Me, Myself and I by G-Eazy and Bebe Rexha

You recently removed an edit I made to "Me, myself and I" song in the background section. My edit was made based of this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=on8F2OXGfJw Bebe Rexha gave for a radio and the source was linked to that paragraph. So before removing stuff , check the sources before. You thought was biased, well you could have opened the video of the interview and heard the exact thing in words said by the writer of the song, it was just a transcript. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.69.5.52 (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Dear Oswhah,

Obstruction of the thruth violate the policy of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia was already be informed.

You as a qualified editor is entitled to correct wrong facts but not to obstruct the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.43.175 (talk) 09:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

At this point, your editing denotes that you are trying to not disclose the name of the father of the child which is already public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.43.175 (talk) 09:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your editing was refered to Wikipedia and to his lawyers. Wikipedia has clear rules and you are obstructing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.43.175 (talk) 10:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry!

Sorry about my edit. I wanted to say that the citations for the info you removed on the Timothy Parker page is the same FiveThirtyEight.com article. I don't know how to cite that because I'm a noob, but I think it is important information for the page. Xmaster8621 (talk) 15:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Xmaster8621

Hi, Xmaster8621! No apologies needed. It appears that the information added was the same by two different users (or the same user while logged out) - each without citing any sources. There was also issues regarding Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which was why I removed the content. All in all, it's a content dispute that needs to be discussed on the article's talk page by everyone involved. There's been too much reverting, and too little (well none) discussion happening, which is why I filed a report and will leave it to another pair of eyes to investigate and step in. If you have any questions or concerns, my talk page is always open. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Sujit Meher

--Vond1926 (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC) This article is promotional and this was deleted previously . False information has been added, Sujit is AD (Accessories design ) student passout with C Grade http://www.nift.ac.in/Downloads/Result_Jan_June2013_AD_VIII.pdf . --Vond1926 (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Dear Wikipedia Members,

I am writing to you today to inform you that my ex-husband Carl-Edward von Bismarck's wikipedia site has been tampered with and manipulated. I have tried to correct the basic errors of my name and marriage history. Unfortunately, someone has been meddling with it and using the wikipedia site for personal vendettas and defamation of character. I would like to state my true corrections in this email once more. I will correct such one more time now. If it will be tampered with again, i will hold whoever is responsible in a court of law. It is my right to have my name spelled correctly. It is my right to have my marriage history recorded and as the mother of my children.

My ex-husband last year has hacked into my Facebook account. He has changed my name, my profile picture, took off all my life contacts and has connected with my friends on Facebook impersonating me. I have reached out to Facebook and discovered through them that the new domain holder for such doing was my ex-husband's email. Facebook has given me the option to bring him on criminal charges. I have decided to let it rest and not bring him on criminal charges, i fixed my Facebook account and started a new one.

However, if these actions continue one more time on Wikipedia I will have no choice but to bring on charges whoever is tampering with it. I apologize in advance for approaching you with such an unfortunate subject and i ask you please to make sure history is recorded correctly.

Here are my changes:

1) My legal name today: Countess Nathalie von Bismarck Bariman 2) My name before marriage: Nathalie Bariman (and not Boriman as was tampered with) 3) I was married to Carl-Edward von Bismarck from 2004 to 2014. 4) We have two children together: Count Alexei von Bismarck 9 years old, Countess Grace von Bismarck 7 years old.

Again, i thank you for taking the time with the hope that you can help me put this disturbing matter to rest. Please do not hesitate to contact me for any further questions you may have.

All the best, Countess Nathalie von Bismarck Bariman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khaoz529k (talk • contribs) 16:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Taoism article

Hi Oshwah,

In response to your message: I made several different edits, and it seems all of them have been reversed. I took the time to provide detailed explanations for each of those edits (found in the article history), but all of them have been reversed without any individual responses given. Saying that a variety of different edits do not adhere to a neutral point of view is not very clear. This is especially important considering that none of the edits I made actually added any text to the article. Further, one of the edits was correcting an entirely objective mistake - the misplacement of the Tao Te Ching image in the I Ching section instead of the Tao Te Ching section. By undoing my edits, that image has now been returned to the incorrect location; it is difficult for me to see how this is a point-of-view issue.

As such, could you examine the reasons I gave for each edit and explain why you feel each of them do not adhere to a neutral point of view? Sunkencathedral (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Sunkencathedral and thank you for your message. I took a look at your previous edit; I thought that you added some content that didn't appear neutral, but I just realized that you simply moved it. I went ahead and restored the page back to the state that it was in with your edits applied. Please accept my apologies for the confusion. If you need anything else, please let me know. Thanks again for leaving me a message regarding your concerns. I very much appreciate it, and I wish you happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Wow, thank you very much for returning the article, and for your prompt reply! I was very confused about why they had been removed; but it was just an honest mistake, it's no problem at all. Thanks again, and happy editing! Sunkencathedral (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey

Just registered on wikipedia and was wondering where a good place is to start helping out or if anything needs to be done if there is a list or something F4d3d123 (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, F4d3d123 - That is an excellent question! Wikipedia's help page with Contributing to Wikipedia is a great place to start if you're looking for somewhere to start diving in and helping out with, but aren't sure where yet. You can also browse Wikipedia's page on WikiProjects; it will let you search for projects that interest you, so you can start getting involved and helping with the articles or content that they're currently working on. Please feel free to message me again if you need more ideas, but these two places should surely set you in the correct direction. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy your stay, and I wish you happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much Oshwah F4d3d123 (talk) 18:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

You bet! My talk page is always open if you run into any more questions or get stuck somewhere! Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Re edit on Saheed Balogun

Thanks for your message. His real name is Saidi balogun but there has been a lot of miss spelling and confusion which turned out to be spelt as Saheed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabioerdters (talk • contribs) 19:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Question about edit reverted

Hi Oshwah, I am currently at an edit-a-thon at UIUC. OOKbook is a participant and I was showing this new user Talk page protocol -- making sure the comment pings the user, proper signature, etc. Is it preferred that a response to a Talk page comment go on that user's Talk page instead? Vaparedes (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Vaparedes! Thanks for letting me know! I reverted your changes to OOKbook's talk page because you modified a comment that OOKbook made, which is typically not allowed and will be reverted (since other editors won't know about your involvement in the Wikipedia Meetup). However, since your objective was simply to give the user an in-person tutorial over talk pages, I personally don't see any problem with it. It would be a better idea to show this person a tutorial by either adding a new message to his/her talk page, or editing a talk page message that you left. This way, it won't result in reversions or confusion by other editors that are patrolling. If you have any more questions, or if you need any help, please do not hesitate to respond and ask. I'll be more than happy to lend you a hand! Good luck at the Meetup! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Oshwah, Vaparedes... Thanks both for the help. Vaparedes made edits b/c we were comparing the interface on my iPad with that on Vaparades's laptop. Sorry for any confusion! OOKbook (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

OOKbook - No apologies needed! Welcome to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, please feel free to message me and ask them. I'll be more than happy to assist you whenever you need it! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

hey

Hey what did you mean Vero6900060 (talk) 19:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Saint Andrews School

":" OSHWAH I DO ATEND SAINT ANDREWS SCHOOL AND I AM A GRADUATING SENOR THIS YEAR AND THE IS MY SENOR PRANK SO PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE IT AGAIN Wownina02 (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Information on 71.179.21.197

Hello Oshwah! I was suspicious of 71.179.21.197, and so looked up his IP. The result is here: http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/71.179.21.197 This indicates that the user is based in Ellicott City, MD. I then looked up Timothy Parker, and found this: http://www.whitepages.com/name/Timothy-E-Parker-Jr./Ellicott-City-MD/i7zf4j1, which is very likely the Timothy Parker from this article, as it shares the age, city, and middle initial of the Tim Parker in the article. Since the White Pages link provided the address, I looked to see exactly how close the IP was to his address. Quite close, imo: http://www.latlong.net/convert-address-to-lat-long.html

I don't know if any of this is helpful in making any decisions, but it does seem very likely that Tim Parker used both a registered account to edit his own page, and then used an unregistered one when he was caught.

Xmaster8621 (talk) 20:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Xmaster8621

help with Lenka Clayton page

I started a draft for Lenka Clayton today, Mar 5, the same day as another page on her was started, which you flagged. Anyway to get my draft moved to article and the other flagged page deleted? Or at least to get the info combined and improved? thank you Lu.heintz (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Lu.heintz, and thanks for leaving me a message with your questions. I see two pages right now: One is Lenka Clayton, which will be deleted because the creator copied text straight from external sources (which is a big violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy). The other is your draft. As soon as the "non-drafted" article is deleted, your draft can replace the previous article in its place (once it has been reviewed and accepted). For now, you just need to sit tight; someone will resolve the matters and your article will be reviewed. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Cheers! -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

UFC 196

Heyy Oshwah! I'm a new user coming in from a bureaucrat in a game wiki, trying to revert vandalism when I can. I was intrigued by a user editing the UFC 196 page. Could you please double check the edits by usernames with long random gibberish are checked? Sometimes I see they are funny.

I've been checking Recent Changes to see what goes on behind the scenes in Wikipedia. That's some active stuff going on there :). Thanks for helping keep Wikipedia credible for me with my schoolwork.

3primetime3 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

a small request

I see that you already templated this IP user. Could you please keep an eye on their contribs? They're making multiple non-useful edits that create work for others. They have multiple recent warnings, including level 4 and 4+. They're been templated for not (make that never) leaving edit summaries or using the preview function, yet still continue to edit doing neither. Multiple attempts to talk to them on their talk page have been ignored. Some edits are helpful, many aren't. There is WP:CIR issue here. Thanks - ^theWOLFchild 12:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Thewolfchild - You got it! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

modification of 2002 National Football League (Ireland)

Hello Oshwah,

I received a message from you regarding an update I made to the page "2002 National Football League (Ireland)". In the message, you indicated that my changes were not accompanied by an edit summary.

The changes I made were in fact accompanied by an edit summary which explains the changes made.

Thanks,

Tinahinse (talk) 14:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Tinahinse! I apologize for the confusion. I realized that you didn't remove anything (I thought you had removed the article infobox); you simply collapsed it. I restored your edit to the article as it was when you made the change. Please let me know if you need anything else :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, I made two edits to that and left the reason for editing it in my first edit, the reason is that, laogai has been abolished since 2015 thus only the number of population being present in prisons are taken into account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Htzh (talk • contribs) 19:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi!

Some users from 4chan are raiding the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Andersson_(game_programmer) page. It's better to lock the article to stop edit wars. Watch out for other paradox pages too. Podcat (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

underground gas

Hello. Early last century, many Midwest communities manufactured glass, making use of regional natural gas. Do some of these pockets of gas still exist? 166.175.185.30 (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Jorge Filipe Monteiro - Reply

Hello OSWAH, from Portugal,

my edit, which you reverted, consisted of removing a storyline which consisted of repeating the infobox in a text, in broken English and with ZERO refs. WP is all about references, is it not? I have been here for almost ten years, so I think I was operating within the guidelines there.

Maybe my summary was a bit over the top and that misled you? Could be, and for that I apologize to the community overall. Attentively, happy editing --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

edit

hello oshwah. I did not mean to delete the whole thing, just 1 word. I am sorry for this error, and I wish to be forgiven for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.130.204.76 (talk) 02:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

removed some content from Ting-Chao Chou

Hi oshwah,

The reason I removed the contents is because I combine some same links from section 6 and 7(removed section) due to some duplicates. Let me know if I am make any mistake.

Thanks. James

Over hasty speedy delete nomination

Plip!

Hi, you nominated Sofia stella feldstein for speedy delete. However that was only 1 minute after creation. You should give the writer a chance, say around 1 hour to get in a claim of importance, and some references. They may now be frightened off. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett - AWW, CRAP!!!! That was done by accident!! Sorry!!! I didn't mean to tag this article. Thanks for catching this :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Also, a trout would have been completely acceptable in this situation ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

The article may have deserved a speedy delete, after waiting, but hopefully a blp prod will have the same outcome, either stimulate the writer to indicate notability, or it will get the chop. Numerous other SD taggers are getting in too fast too. There is a lot of over-enthusiasm around. I am trying out the different sized fish. I don't think it deserves a full sized trout! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett - I completely agree; I usually wait at least 15 minutes after the article's creation before considering any claim of significance CSD tag. It's the right thing to do, as "racing to be the first person to CSD that article" is absolutely a BITE to newcomers, and it's not what CSD was meant for. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Recent revisions to the Henryk Fuchsbrunner article

Hey there, I got your message about the reversion of my revisions to the Henryk Tauber/Fuchsbrunner article. My goal with the edits was cleaning up the grammar, improving the clarity of the article and reducing redundancy. For one example, he's referred to by three different last names in the article - Tauber (his birth name), Fuchsbrunner (the name he was most often known by), and Fuchs (the changed spelling of his name once he immigrated to the U.S.). I just changed all of the references to Fuchsbrunner for clarity. The last paragraph I deleted contained all material that was either unverifiable or contained in earlier paragraphs already, and the rest of the edits were just to make the writing grammatically correct. Of course, it doesn't bother me if the reversion stands. 98.203.240.70 (talk) 07:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

sorry for destroying this site

( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.137.140.169 (talk) 09:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Regarding the Chitauri page

If you want to find a better way to word that correction, I have no objection. What would you suggest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3150:EAD0:496C:7B1F:EE52:6D77 (talk) 09:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks and smile

I edited the page Mahika Sharma (actress) and removed the issue created by someone. Because I do not think their are any copy/edit problem. Many a times I have found most of Indian wiki pages goes off or been deleted without any reason. I would request you to keep Indian wiki page store and if you can help solving the issues post on the page. Kindly do think.. thanks Indianeditor22 (talk) 10:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Andrew Crawford (neuroscientist)

Please read the reference before reverting. Cheers Rentier (talk) 10:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi

Dear Manager,

Sorry to interrupt your main source. I just wanna contribute of the biography of Abdullah Makapaar or Abdullah Macapaar. What I am contributing is relevance. just want to updating the exact details.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed Fiefee (talk • contribs) 10:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Gyanmati Mataji Guiness Certificate

Hello, I was about to upload the Guiness Certificate.

11:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErASethi (talk • contribs)

On reverted comment at Talk:Clang

Hi Oshwah, you messaged me about removing my talkpage comment here.

Thank you for keeping Wikipedia talk space clean and moderated!

While we're at it, could you also clean up the whole Talk:Clang#Compatibility_with_C.2C_compile_Unice_Softwares.2C_and_use_of_Brand_Name section? I admit that my comment was not particularly constructive, but the section it addressed is well beyond any sane reason.

If not, then I wonder how exactly you discriminate one unconstructive comment from another (and delete one, but leave the other), because that doesn't seem like a neutral way of moderation.

Best wishes, anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.90.177.150 (talk • contribs)

Statue of Ahimsa

Hello, Thanks for ur commnets. The Guiness guys visited the Statue yesterday and they awarded the certificate yesterday.

ErASethi (talk) 12:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Regarding The Asterisk War's premise I found on the Crunchyroll site, I found its premise to be more accurate (coming from what I watched of the show):

Invertia (meteor storm)… an unprecedented disaster that struck the world during the 20th century.

Because of this disaster, numerous cities around the world were destroyed. However, within the meteor, an unknown element called mana (the all-encompassing element), was discovered, which allowed human technology to make rapid strides.

This also gave rise to a new species of human born with unique skills – the Star Pulse Generation (Genestella).

The setting for the world’s greatest comprehensive battle spectacle, the Festas (Star Warrior Festivals), is an academy city above the water surrounded by six academies called Rikka also commonly known as Asterisk. Having transferred into Seidoukan Academy in order to fulfill his own wish, scholarship student Ayato Amagiri swears he too will fight in this city.

Burning souls race…

The curtain rises on this school battle spectacle! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.5.114.106 (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Libyan Investment Authority

Hello.

Thank you for taking an interest in Libyan Investment Authority. All edits made by me were in a good faith, not in favour of any party as they represent current, ongoing situation - leadership dispute between Abdulmagid Breish and Hassan Bouhadi. They both claim chairmanship and until Court ruling is available (which is supposed to be in two weeks time) this information should be available not to mislead readers.

The following articles (used as references) clearly represents this neutral point of view:

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20150531/local/ex-banker-back-as-head-of-67bn-fund.570326

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/11713902

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-07-09/libya-s-66-billion-wealth-fund-replaces-chairman-amid-probe

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-libya-security-swf-idUKKCN0W9007

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueSeedRose (talk • contribs) 13:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. You're engaging in edit warring by continuously reverting content back-and-fourth with another user (See Wikipedia's three-revert rule). These policies exist in order to drive discussion. Edit warring can (and usually will) result in being blocked from editing. Please discuss the content dispute on the article's talk page with the other user. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Somebody trying to defaming on Public figure

Dear Oshwah,

Thank you so much for edit of Sujit Meher page. Someone keep trying to defame this public figure page. Always putting unnecessary data about this public profile. Please kindly take some action against those ip addresses. And i would request you to tell me the ip address of Vond1926 user who tried to defame the profile of the person so that we can take some action against it. Its a humble request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novelbuzz (talk • contribs) 14:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Novelbuzz. I'll keep an eye out for you regarding the article. And as far as revealing to you the IP Address of a Wikipedia Account? That absolutely will not happen. That is private data, and is not disclosed to other users. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Dear Oshwah,

Thank you so much. Yes i even want you to keep an eye this article so that no one can defame this public figure article. Again thanks for your quick revert and cooperation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novelbuzz (talk • contribs) 04:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello

Hello sorry if i did something wrong but i think may edit is quite accurate and that you are doing is a harrasement. Thank you and sorry for my language, in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.85.225.204 (talk) 14:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

A note about Ostriches

Dear sir,

I am from Uzbekistan and know that it is generally considered an ill omen to eat ostrich, as some consider it black magic over there. Now, when I came to America, I noticed that ostrich is not only eaten in some restaurants, but eaten as a exquisite meat, such as restaurants swerving Ostrich burgers. Unsurprisingly, this was a strange and disorienting experience for me, but opened my eyes to the world around me as to how cultures appear different in other people's eyes. I find it confusing as to why you reverted this edit. I noted you said I needed a citation? I understand the need, I suppose, but as a person who has lived there for a good amount of his life, isn't a first person account a detailed enough response? It works well enough for stories of Junius Caesar, and I note he is present on this online center of information. I ask you to please allow this note to remain present on this page which I am quite found of. Thank you, and have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spencertmiller (talk • contribs) 14:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the FOREO page input

Hi,

thank you for your message regarding FOREO page. I am actually trying to make it less promotional and removing multiple issues that appear on the page. If you would be so kind to send me any advice on how to specifically correct my input I would be thankful.

Best regards,

Lucija Pocrnja (talk) 14:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thanks for your contributions to vandal-fighting. You are doing a very good job. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, JamesBWatson! It's good to talk to you again! Thank you for taking the time to leave me a message, and for your kind words. I very much appreciate it. I've been vandal-fighting for 8+ years; it's something I enjoy doing, although it really skews my contribution namespace distribution percentages - edit tools show that I mostly edit article space and user talk space, but it's because I revert a lot of vandalism. So, of course, it's going to. Oh well; I like doing it. Someone's gotta do it ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

"Someone's gotta do it": absolutely. It's an area of Wikipedia work that doesn't always get the recognition that it deserves, but it is absolutely vital. Without it, Wikipedia would gradually become a useless load of junk that nobody would consult. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

JamesBWatson - Indeed! I absolutely agree. I'm still considering re-applying for RFA this year (although I'm not sure exactly when this year I should), so that I can be more useful with vandal-fighting and contributing to AIV (among other reasons, of course). I got slammed last time for no content creation (which I've definitely improved - hopefully enough to where it doesn't become an issue again). I just don't want to run again "too soon". I don't know; I'd just hate to fail a second time. :-P ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

In my opinion, the "can't be an admin because he/she hasn't created dozens of articles" gang are probably the single worst harmful thing in RfA, but they are sufficient in numbers to have a considerable impact. I almost declined the invitation to stand at RfA because I thought I would be shot right down by the "not enough content creation" gang, but as it turned out I was lucky: I got through with far less article creation in my history than many an RfA candidate who has been rejected for lack of article creation. I suppose to some extent it's the luck of the draw, depending on who comes along to the RfA. Anyway, you now have more article creation in your history than I had at the time of my RfA, so it shouldn't be a bar to success. Also, in my RfA I attempted to anticipate possible criticism for lack of article content by detailing contributions where I had substantially rewritten existing articles from scratch. I felt (and still feel) that doing so is just as much experience of content creation as any articles listed as created by me. If you are interested in seeing what I wrote, it is under the heading "Additional optional question from Peter". I don't know whether there's anything similar you could usefully say if you do go for another RfA. I don't think the lack of content creation argument should be a major consideration at present, and personally I would attach far more weight to some of the other reasons for opposing at your RfA, such as Dennis Brown's very thoughtful comments on various issues, particularly that most of your editing had taken place within three months (which is no longer true), and the criticisms of your original answer to question 9. I would say that the substantial majority of opposes were for reasons which either no longer apply, or apply to a much lesser extent than they did then.

You say "I'd just hate to fail a second time". I can well understand that. Do you know, even though I was accepted with over 90% support, I felt really stressed by the opposes: it's an intimidating experience, having a string of people one after another publicly posting heavy criticism of what they seeing as your weaknesses and faults, and indicating that they don't trust you to do a good job. And if I felt that in an RfA which succeeded, I can well imagine that it must be even more unpleasant to undergo an RfA which fails. However, please bear in mind the following two facts: (1) you got considerably more supports than opposes, and (2) for the sorts of reasons I have mentioned, you should stand a much better chance a second time. However, I suggest waiting at least until July, which will be a year after you became significantly active on Wikipedia, and it might be safer to wait at least until September, when a year has gone since your last try. I think once things are measured in units of years, even just one year, rather than months, the "too soon" feeling is likely to be much less.

Just one more thing. It may help your chances at a second RfA if you get more experience on the various Wikipedia-space pages that concern admin work. You have large numbers of good AIV reports (which is how I came to start this talk page section) but a much more limited amount of experience in other admin areas. I don't personally think that there is such a lack of relevant experience that it should count against you, but some editors may think it does. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

JamesBWatson - I really appreciate your in-depth response and your honest opinion. Thank you :-). I agree that waiting until at least July is a good idea. I was originally thinking about waiting until September (one year after my first RfA). By then, I should have another article brought up to GA status (I'm working with a small group of editors that want to knock out a few GA's as I do), and I'll have a solid editing history that everyone will want to see. I'll also consider getting involved in more admin areas, as you lightly suggested as well. Cool, in a nutshell: I'll keep doing what I'm doing and wait a few more months. Running for admin isn't anything I'm rushing at all; It's not that big of a deal to me. I'm and admin on test.wiki, so I know how everything works. It's really just a few more buttons, that's all. Would I make a good admin? I think that I would. Do I need / would I make good use of the tools? Oh yeah, you bet. I'd be much more useful with them. But I can certainly wait. Thanks again, JamesBWatson. Much, much appreciated! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I think JBW is giving good advice, and I agree with you that September is best, a year after your first. I haven't looked at your stats today, so can't speak to them, but would just say that working on a few articles in a significant way is helpful. Not a GA, just taking something you know and improving it greatly, and doing that a few times. You can't please those that want you have to 100 articles created, but those are rare souls. Most of us just want examples showing you can create or recreate something worth reading. If you have the power to protect, delete or block, you have to know the core reason we are here; prose. A good place to do that is AFD, actually, just go patrolling until you see something that you can save because it was nominated too early. Those are excellent examples of leadership and what we like to see in candidates. Have a few hundred AFDs behind you, if you haven't already. AFD is an understaffed and under appreciated place full of opportunity for someone wanting to make a difference. NAC is ok but not impressive, saving articles and giving very good rationales (keep or delete) is. Do all that and there will plenty of people willing to nominate you, including myself and I would imagine JBW. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Dennis Brown - I apologize for taking so long to respond to you. I very much appreciate your input and analysis. I've helped bring an article to GA status and I've created articles since my last RFA. I will wait until September, keep doing what I'm doing, and.... we'll see :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Luke Losey Wikipedia page

"hello Oshwah, my name is Luke Losey the page is about me. I don't want to alter the facts but remove the rambling subjective from this page as i believe it is unrepresentative of me as person and has been added to by to many people, i respect wikipedia and peoples rights to add and alter but would really like this to be to the point. Thats what i was trying to edit. Apologies if it came across as vandalism - this is not my intention. You can of course compare the old page to the new and make up your own mind. With thanks Luke"

Llosey (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Spencertmiller

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Finnoflannigan/Archive. I'd forgotten and saw the talk page pop up on my watchlist and had to ask why! Anyway, they're gone. Doug Weller talk 15:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Doug Weller - It's good to run into you again! Awesome! Thanks for updating the investigation and for letting me know! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

create a page

″hi, I am trying to create a page for an English football that has just moved abroad to continue his football career. could you help me with this please ″Soccerdudeinfo (talk) 15:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Soccerdudeinfo! Sure can! Have you reviewed Wikipedia:Your first article? This is a good tutorial page that will assist you with creating the article. Alternatively, you can go through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process so that you'll receive reviews before the article is published. Either method you choose should provide you with adequate assistance. Please let me know if you have any more questions or if you need anything else. I'll be happy to lend you a hand! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Re: Shirley B Eniang

I think you should google who this woman is. I see no reason as to why she cannot be added to the Notable People list of the University of Nottingham. She has been a true inspiration to many, especially young adults, which has seen her rise to popularity. I do wish you would take this into consideration. 92.25.128.85 (talk) 15:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I would like some help/advice

I want to create a WikiProject for the New Orleans Saints but I don't quite know how. How does one make a WikiProject? Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 16:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Leggomygreggo8! Excellent question! I believe that Wikipedia:WikiProject#Creating and maintaining a project should point you in the right direction. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Good luck! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Is there a template I should use for my proposal? Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 16:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Leggomygreggo8 - I'm honestly not completely sure; I haven't created a WikiProject before. Does the WikiProject page offer any help with that? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Not that I can see. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 16:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Leggomygreggo8: The WikiProject Council offers a guide which may help

-- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 16:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Additionally, to answer your question - {{WikiProject}} is a boilerplate template for starting a WikiProject -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 16:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Samtar to the rescue! Thanks for helping out with this request for help. Much appreciated, Samtar! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

thanks all :D Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 18:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

But I realized that that is for an actual WP, I want to start a proposal. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

A possible misunderstanding?

I've just seen your answer to a request for help at User talk:2.126.55.14. It looks to me as though you may have missed the point of the question. If I understood it correctly, the question was about the possibility of creating an article on a new topic, which the IP editor compared to Godwin's law, but you appeared to take it as a question about creating an article about Godwin's law itself. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

JamesBWatson - I re-read the question, and I think you're right. It looks like the user coined a similar topic and wanted to create an article on it. I must be having one of those days again!!! :-) - Thanks for catching this, and for letting me know! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Vandal

IP 81.158.35.138 has a mess on his talk page of warnings and denied block requests. He is back, and is now typing bad words on his talk page. I don't know how to deal with him. In 6 months fighting vandals, I have never seen this and am requesting advice. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 18:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Joel.Miles925! Thanks for leaving me a message with your request for help. You're always welcome to ask me for input any time that you need it. So, I took a look at 81.158.35.138's talk page, and I removed the incivility left while the IP was blocked. The IP has vandalized since the block expired; I'd just continue as you normally do, and report the IP back to AIV if it continues, so a longer block can be placed. As I said earlier, please do not hesitate to message me any time you need help or have any questions. Cheers! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:11, 7 March 2016

Sorry for my delay in responding. I thank you for giving me the advice, until we meet again! Joel.Miles925 (talk) 20:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

No apologies needed. You're very welcome. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Shoe fetishism

For future reference the SPI for this guy is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Borcker Meters (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Meters! Awesome! Thanks for letting me know about the SPI! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, it took me a while to find it so I thought I would pass it on since you've noticed him too. Meters (talk) 18:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hell yeah! Always appreciated! It's good to talk to you again, Meters; happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Ian Thomas Malone

Hi. Part of a group project for class at Pomona College to make a page for Ian Thomas Malone. Can you help us to bring the page up to wiki standards? Really need to get a good grade on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galacticbinks42 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Galacticbinks42 - If this a required class assignment, then that's unfortunate and you need to speak to the person who assigned you this article. The person does not appear to meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines, nor does it appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines regarding people. This isn't anything that you can fix within your article; your article is not the main issue in regards to the deletion discussion. It's whether or not the person meets these guidelines after performing research and source searching. Your best option is to pick another article subject to write about, in my honest opinion. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

New Orleans Saints

I have made a little outline for the Saints WikiProject, how does it look? Apologies if this is not the right place, I am very self-conscious and get very embarrassed when I mess up so I wanna make sure i don't make a stupid mistake

Collapsing wikiproject draft

This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!

Shortcut

WP:WPT

This is the WikiProject of the New Orleans Saints.

Info

Scope

Our focus is on the creation, upkeep, and improvement of all things New Orleans Saints. For now, we won't be doing much as we have a lack of members.

Goals

Get at least 5 members Improve this page

Participants

If you would like to help with this WikiProject, please write your name down: # {{User|Username here}}

leggomygreggo8 (talk · contribs)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by leggomygreggo8 (talk • contribs)

leggomygreggo8 - You may not be allowed to use the Saints logo per the fair use image guidelines. Other than that, seems to look good to me! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

@Leggomygreggo8: The images is PD, so it should be fine. This might be better off as a subproject of WP:NFL, like WP:STEELERS. I suggest starting a discussion at WT:NFL. Hi Oshwah. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

And hello back to you, JJMC89! Thanks for stepping in and providing leggomygreggo8 with help, and for correcting me on my thoughts regarding the image. It's always appreciated! Hope you're doing well! Happy editing, my friend! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

What is the difference between a sub project and a WikiProject? I see both and so I am not sure. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 13:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Alma mater of Nasser Al Khelaifi

Hi Oshwah,

Can you kindly add alma mater information to Nasser Al-Khelaifi page?

Regards, Faisal — Preceding unsigned comment added by FALHABABI (talk • contribs) 22:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Jewish Museum of Australia page

Hello Oshwah,

We are writing to you from the Jewish Museum of Australia. The information that is currently live is incorrect. We edited the information so that it was more accurate, the source is from our website and archives. Can you please approve the edits that we suggested as it is correct information. The following sources are here: http://www.jewishmuseum.com.au/about

http://www.jewishmuseum.com.au/collections

If you require any further resources, please let us know. Furthermore, if you require us to resubmit the content please advise us the best way to do that. Regards, Elysheva Elsass e.elsass@jewishmuseum.com.au 203.213.59.166 (talk) 00:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Your recent editing history at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

HAHAHAHA!!! Liz - I think you added this by a mistake :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, no, I was serious because you were party to an edit war. But as the other editor has been indefinitely blocked, it seems like these reverts were warranted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

LOL, it was definitely not a violation on my part. Liz - He was revering my reporting of his account to the page. See his contributions. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Yep, that's definitely a known, long-term sockmaster. —DoRD (talk) 03:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

No worries; all taken care of. Thanks Liz and DoRD :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

My mistake, Oshwah. As I said, I now see your reverts were warranted and that you were fighting vandalism. I'm sorry for the template. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 12:53, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Liz! No apologies needed! It's perfectly fine; no harm done at all. Thanks for being available and for the cleanup that you've done on my talk page. It's much appreciated. It's good to talk to you again, and I wish you happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:57, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Whats the problem

I dont understand why my article is trying to be taken down. If i can prevent this article from being removed in any way please contact me at joelwatkins888@gmail.com or simply msg me on here.

P.S This is a real person with real influential and skillful medical abilities. Why is wikipedia telling me that he is not relevant.

Seals and Crofts

I corrected a mistake and you rejected it. The "Crew Cuts" should be "Crew Cats". For proof, just Google "Dean Beard Crew Cats" and you will see multiple images of his 45 rpm records that clearly show "Crew Cats". I am also from the area Dean Beard lived and have knowledge of his career. https://www.discogs.com/Dean-Beard-And-The-Crew-Cats-Dean-Beard-And-Jack-And-Bill-My-Roberta-No-Love-For-Me/release/4852321 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.219.9.151 (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Kiran_Bir_Sethi

Dear Oshwah,

Thank you for replying so promptly, and having the patience and consideration to explain how the AFD works to a newbie like me.

I based my request on the following comment by user DDG on the deleted article's talk page, where he wrote the following comment:

"It is possible that she is notable, but if so, the article still needs to be deleted and started over. As David Eppstein said, the promotionalism is too pervasive. I also tried to see if a little rewriting would help, and failed also. Lack of notability is not the only reason for deletion. Borderline notability combined with clear promotionalism is an equally good reason."

It was based on this comment as well as the discussion that preceded this comment that I made my request. Please advise if, given these observations by the editors in the talk page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kiran_Bir_Sethi, could I request a review of an rewritten article that attempts to address the issues.

For instance, in terms of notability, among many other achievements, Design For Change, the movement started by Kiran Sethi, was recently identified by the UN as one of 15 programs that can help achieve its global goals for sustainable development. UN Global Goals Programs. We would like to, if possible, add an article on the Design for Change movement Design for Change and like Kiran's biography to this article.

Once again, thank you for your time! :)

Best, Mohan --Mrgudipati (talk) 06:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Mrgudipati. No problem, I'm always happy to help out new people. If the article is deemed notable to pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines, it generally shouldn't be deleted, but instead improved. The "advertising" or non-neutral wording can simply be changed or removed. However, if it's acknowledged that the person meets the guidelines and the article is still deleted (which really shouldn't happen), you can certainly just start over and re-write the article. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Cheers, and good luck! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

==========

Thank you! We will add the updated article over the next few days and I look forward to your feedback / review.

Best, Mohan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.93.85.30 (talk) 06:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello!

That's about it. Just wanted to say hi. DubitoErgoCogito^ErgoSum. 14:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi DubitoErgoCogito! How are you? :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

I am quite well, myself! And you? I'm trying to make people's days a little better, and a simple hello seems to go a long way. DubitoErgoCogito^ErgoSum. 12:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

DubitoErgoCogito - Indeed it does! And having that level of kindness and enthusiasm towards other editors (no matter how rude or uncivil they are to you) is the level of civility that sets a good example to others, is looked highly upon by many, and something you should definitely keep up. I'm doing okay; just relaxing and doing some volunteering and trying to unwind and not think about personal life ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

I do my best to be my best. I'm sure someone has said that before me, but I can't tell if it's a quote or not. I'm doing much the same; working on some lingering old articles that need copyediting. C'est la vie. DubitoErgoCogito^ErgoSum. 12:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

stop changing my profile

This is Lisa Brown-Miller. My page is incorrect. I corrected it. Please stop changing it back to the incorrect information. Thanks.

Its my life. I live it everyday. I am the reliable source.

Please stop changing my edits. This is the life I live. Every. Day. I know it better than anyone else. Lisa Brown-Miller — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.77.235.3 (talk) 15:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Lisa Brown-Miller, Sorry, but citations to reliable sources are required. It's not about you; it's biogaphy policy. We have only your word that you are who you say you are. In any event, if you are who you say you are, please take a look at Conflict of interest, as editing your own article is not advised. In any event, it not "your profile" but is a wikipedia article about Lisa Brown-Miller. This isn't Facebook. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Message from you about reverting one of my recent contributions.

I didn't make any edits to that page. I am not even sure what that page is or was even aware of its existence. I am the only one who has access to this computer so I do not know how this could have happened. Thanks for reaching out and leaving me a message. 50.141.97.67 (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Some advice...?

This IP user made edits to this page; Private intelligence agency, including adding the name of a company; "Etikx intelligence". Then immediately after, this new user account was created with the same name; "Etikx". Only other edits so far are to talk pages in support of WP:OR for the private intelligence industry, with this user claiming "they are in the industry". So, is this a spamming issue? A COI issue? An account name issue? Should it be reported? ...and where? (or will you deal with it?) Or should it be ignored? Thanks. - ^theWOLFchild 10:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Filed WP:UAA report for Etikx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) per the username policy -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 10:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Thewolfchild, I would personally recommend that you leave a COI notice on their talk page, with OR warning notices as appropriate. I don't have the time to check personally whether or not you have done that, so my apologies if you already have. --Ches (talk) 11:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the replies guys. I see that after samtar's UAA report, the user has been indef'd. These are helpful tips for next time. (if there's one). Cheers - ^theWOLFchild 11:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

84.13.168.254 vandalism

Somaliland page is always under vandalism can you do anything about it thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.233.222.45 (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2016

Marco Holger Page

On the Marco Holger page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Höger) there is a mistake, it states in the introduction, top part of the page, that he plays for Shalke 04 while it is shown in his senior career that he now plays for 1. FC Köln. Sorry if any mistakes were made as I am a new Wikipedia user. Thank You, Koogle1000 (talk) 02:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Koogle1000

My final warning

I am contacting you to make you aware you may not block me because I did not put false information on KB(rapper) Wikipedia page so I am waiting for you to remove my final warning. Thank you I will be waiting — Preceding unsigned comment added by BillyK17 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Nasty P - changes to article

Hi Oshwah

Thank you for helping out on the article I really appreciate it!!

I am new to this and trying my hardest to pick it all up but I am coming across an issue maybe you can pass your expertise on ?

On the article it shows that its an orphan page at the moment. I used the easy link finder on here and I think I tied up Nasty P to the KFM records article page however I am unsure if I must then remove the orphan tag or if I must find something else to link it up to ? I did read that one link may be enough but I am hoping that you can pass some knowledge my way.

Many Thanks

Azura81 (talk) 17:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Azura81! Pages are called "orphans" when there are no other pages on Wikipedia that link to it. If there are related articles that you know mention this article, you just need to link the words using [[ ]]. That will no longer make it an orphan. It's not a big deal, and it won't lead to the deletion of the article. But it helps to have it linked so that others can navigate to it by other means than just searching. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

HI Oshwah,

Thank you for replying so soon. I did link it to the KFM records on their article page but the orphan tag still seems to remain on the nasty p article. Does the robot remove it ? or do I have to remove it? or do I just leave it once I have linked it ? sorry to ask silly questions.

thank you

Azura81 (talk) 08:04, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Azura81 - There should be a bot that does it within a few hours or so, but you can also remove it if you wish :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Citation

Hi oshwah,Thanks for writing to me. the citations are not opening in the link. So, I removed the content. Hope i would like to justify the content.

Nagoba321 (talk) 02:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Oshwah I personally know chazz and he had me edit his information to become more accurate — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:Contributions/ (talk) 02:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

50.207.162.120 - Sorry, but that's original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's policy on that (linked in this response); it will answer your questions and address any concerns that you have.

Possible spam

This page [2] does not appear appropriate. Abel Lawrence (talk) 04:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Upon closer look, maybe its just a draft of a new article. However, I get suspicious of red usernames.Abel Lawrence (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Abel Lawrence! Yes, it is a draft. Those have to be approved before becoming articles. But do remember that if any draft is eligible for speedy deletion under the "general" criterion (such as G12), you can tag them. If you run into any more questions, my talk page is always open for you. Cheers! :-)

Thank you. However, I found another page which makes me uneasy [3]. If the page is appropriate, I apologize. If not, deal with it according to policies. Abel Lawrence (talk) 04:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Abel Lawrence - This is a page in a user's sandbox. Unless there's a blatant copyright violation, spam, or attack on another user or living person, then these aren't inappropriate in general. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:42, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. And sorry for inconvenience. I was just uncertain if it was advertising. Thanks for explaining. Abel Lawrence (talk) 04:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

No apologies needed, Abel Lawrence! You're always welcome to message me with any questions. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia Article on J. Frank Dalton

Dear Oshwah:

I am in the process of revising the Wikipedia article on J. Frank Dalton. In the past few days I have added a lot of information to the article. Subsequently, further intensive research which I have been conducting on this subject has shown that some of my new contributions to the article were false information, so I am now in the process of revising some parts of that information and altogether deleting other parts of it. I am an expert on the subject of J. Frank Dalton, and I am the person who contributed most of the information to the article in the first place. In the past 2 months somebody revised the article, saying new DNA research has revealed that "J. Frank Dalton" was actually the son of David Dalton and Nancy J. Self. Over the past few days I have been researching that idea and the information that someone had contributed to the article to that effect, and I have now reached the conclusion that that information is a mistaken idea. In other words, in reality, contrary to what that other contributor believes, "J. Frank Dalton" was NOT the son of David Dalton and Nancy J. Self. I am in the process of revising the article in such a way that it becomes clear to readers why "J. Frank Dalton" was not J. F. Dalton (born 1858) of Ripley County, Missouri and Randolph County, Arkansas.

Basically all I am doing is just "revising" what I myself have contributed to the article over the past few days. I am mostly just deleting information which further research on my part has shown to definitely be false. I don't want to be responsible for all that false information in the article.72.68.90.239 (talk) 05:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

hi oshwah

dear, tarek fateh never proclaimed to be ahmadi. He founded muslim canadian congress instead of using ahmadiyya muslim community forum.http://www.muslimcanadiancongress.org/. i think the ahmadiyya tag on his profile be removed because of lack of proof that he is ahmadi. if you have any proof i will be happy to see. thanks for interest and inquiry. waiting for reply. regards 50.153.173.37 (talk) 05:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit at 2016 in spaceflight

Hi Oshwah: I did step-wise editing to move the entries for some of the PRC launches to more specific locations as more specific launch dates are provided. Please don't revert them. Also I added a reference as to why 2 Taikounauts, instead 3, will be on the Shenzhou-11 mission. Regards, 73.231.196.103 (talk) 06:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

this is the reference

dear i send you a message added a section about religion in talk. plz the source is clear do no revert the change if you have an inquiry feel free to send me a message. i sent you a message earlier.

https://lubpak.com/archives/316151 regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.153.173.37 (talk • contribs)

Hairstyle

U need a brush m8 Lelelelelele123 (talk) 06:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

thanks and help needed

Hi Oshwah,

Thank you fro your help! But I am not very clear about what to do next to make my article not be deleted, could you please tell me exactly what to revise? Appreciate for that!

Regards nancy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyyf2015 (talk • contribs) 06:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Lyyf2015 - Hi! And thanks for leaving me a message! Currently as the article stands, it doesn't appear to be in the process of any deletion. However, it looks like there is a lot that can be done to improve the article and bring it up to standards. If you observe the issues tag located at the top of the article, it will tell you exactly what the problems are and how you can fix them. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to message me and ask. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hello!

Please don't delete information about the position of Stanford in Round University Ranking. I'm not so good user of Wiki, that's why the process is long. Just now I'm adding all links))Vittoriona (talk) 09:01, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Vittoriona, sorry but you need to cite a reliable source alongside the edit you're trying to make. Content such as what you're adding can be challenged and removed if none is provided. Please review the Wikipedia guidelines I linked in this response and let me know if you have any questions about them. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:03, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Oshwah, is it enough or I should give more links:

Stanford was ranked the 2nd in the Round University Ranking<ref>{{cite web|url=http://roundranking.com/universities.html?univ=Stanford+University&back=/ranking.html&sort=O&year=2015&subject=SO |title = RUR-Stanford University|year=2015 |accessdate=November 12, 2015}}</ref>??? Thanks!Vittoriona (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Vittoriona - As long as it's referenced, perfectly fine with me :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Oshwah could you please help me to add information to the rating table of Stanford? Vittoriona (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

the ASTRO NJOI doesn't have the channel that u edit because i am also the astro njoi subscriber so i know the detail more then you, if got any new channel i will update here, TQ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.140.194.158 (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

I was about to cite them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westlanddrive (talk • contribs) 09:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Geneva University Hospitals

Hello, I see you reverted my edits on this page. Can you please tell me what you consider being a reliable source... I consider the ones I added being trustworthy enough - local sources but trustworthy (Swiss Health, Rega Geneve, International Geneva...). Especially since this page is the one of big hospital in Geneva but there is clear lack of content and sources. Thanks in advance, Anna Micholat (talk) 10:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Anna Micholat - That's completely fine, but you need to cite the source directly with the content that you're adding. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Philip hollobone

Its in the public domain and fully verifiable and 100% a fact and is in the public interest — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard willis21 (talk • contribs) 10:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Richard willis21 - Then you need to cite a reliable source to show that the content you're adding is true. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Given all the recent attention you've been receiving from some lovely people, I thought you could do with a cookie to keep you going!

-- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 12:43, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Samtar! It's always a pleasure talking to you, good sir! Thanks for the cookie! Yes, interesting enough, my talk page has been lit up by trolls and vandals pretty good today. Shoot, Liz even semi-protected it! Oh well, all in a day's fun! Hope things are going well for you :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:46, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

It was the least I could do. I haven't seen such a busy editor talk page in quite a while. I guess it shows how active you are, Oshwah! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:04, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Liz! HA! Yeah, this is quite an active talk page. The new user questions are plentiful, and the amount of trolling, vandalism, insults, etc are typical. Just a normal day for vandal patrolling :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Vandal

You have a vandal (username FrugglePants) who is firing obscenity laden statements at you for reverting his "contributions". You probably already know, but here's another notice. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 14:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Joel.Miles925! He'll be taken care of ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

I think my edit on Shock rock was constructive

I think the bands I added have performed shock values. Why did you think it was unconstructive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrs. Jan Cola (talk • contribs) 15:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Mrs. Jan Cola - I left you a follow-up on your talk page. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

My Page

Please leave the page Robb Cilek alone. It is being used for a school project, and I have to have it so I can get graded.

Thank you Robb — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobbCilek (talk • contribs) 17:16, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, RobbCilek. Unfortunately, this is now how Wikipedia works. If you want to contest the deletion of the article, you need to follow the direction on the tag and contest it on the article's talk page. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

So basically you aren't letting me get a grade? Gee whiz thanks idiot. Now i can't win best wikipage in my class.

However, how do i join the Anti Vandalism unit? Lots of pages i watch get vandalized with lots of false info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobbCilek (talk • contribs) 17:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

RobbCilek - Anyone can join. Just visit the Counter-vandalism Unit Project Page for more information. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Clutch albums

Hello Oshwah,

I see one of my projects has been closed/deleted. Nuro msg me 00:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Nuro Dragonfly - Which one? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, been busy. I was just refering to the 3 albums that I had been part of the AfD process with....seams I've lost my cause. Nuro msg me 22:18, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

TODO: RESPOND TO NURO DRAGONFLY

I didn't make an contribution to LOWERN

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to LOWERN— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.114.155.61 (talk)

208.114.155.61 - You may be on a shared IP address. Creating an account will resolve this if this is the problem. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hudson Falls, NY

How can I add the Village's website to an "External Links" section?

Their web address is: http://www.villageofhudsonfalls.com/

Michelle Wood67.240.52.146 (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 67.240.52.146! It looks like the website has already been added as an external link, so I think you're good to go :-). If you have any additional questions or need help with anything, please do not hesitate to message me on my talk page here. I'll be more than happy to assist you with anything you need! Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Talking dishonestly

Listen your talking shit about the Maltese I'm a high ranking member this isn't about England your writing about the americans ......so put your bullshit on the american page, you are angering the family--Dralip123 (talk) 10:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the message above, in which you have (naturally) been mentioned. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi! Thanks again for watching over my talk page. I left you a "thank you" on your talk page, but I figured I'd respond here too! It's a pleasure to shake hands with you, and I wish you happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

No worries! Great days! Fantastic hair! Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Electromotive force article edit

I made an edit a few days ago as a sort of query of one of the facts presented in the article which you deleted for being irrelevant. In part 5.1 "chemical sources" the final line includes the phrase "at 273 K (room temperature)". 273K is not room temperature. I didn't know which part of that to edit though since I didn't know which one was relevant to the article. I didn't know whether to change the article to "at 273 K (0°C/32°F)" or to "at 298 K (room temperature)". I hope you read this and respond suitably, Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.105.95 (talk) 00:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

RE: March 2016

don't know how to add a source, but he has died: http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/david-tennants-father-dead-78-7574541

do you think you could add the source for me? 141.163.83.41 (talk) 13:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 141.163.83.41! It's easy to do. Check out Wikipedia's guide to citing sources. It should help you with doing that. Please let me know if you need additional assistance. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi again, I added the source to the article. Hope it looks alright. Thanks for your assistance :) 141.163.83.41 (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

You bet! Glad I could help! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Inserting an Image

Last week,I was editing a page and I wanted to show an image as a visual, but I don't know how to insert an image. Can you please tell me how to insert an image while editing a page? Thank You,Teslalolcow (talk) 13:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Teslalolcow! Check out Wikipedia's guideline on Images. It should help you with your question. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Lewis Tappan

On the lewis tappan wikipedia page instead of lewis tappan it says lewis fart on the picture. please change it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:56C4:870:69A0:A216:5D59:3C1C (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Cameron Todd Willingham

Showing only an altered version of Willingham's last statement is not objective. It is not our job as Wikipedia editors to let our own idealism get in the way of neutrality. Painting a more sympathetic picture of an executed killer is not our prerogative as editors. The correct course of action is either to display the last statement in it's entirety or to not display it at all - which is why I removed it on my second edit. I ask you to to consider this position as it is indeed in line with Wikipedia quality standards and is in keeping with general precedence. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuel Rosenbalm (talk • contribs) 14:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

hlae amigos aim sis spanish islammooslim hindu mon! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soupenstein (talk • contribs) 14:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

ყლე ხარ შე ხუთთეთრიანო ბოზო — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.104.28.23 (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

speed deletion of ConstantVzw wikipedia entry?

Hi!

I am curious in your argumentation on why it should be deleted as material is neither copyrighted (actually all of their work is about public domain and promotion of free/open source/media/come), nor it is advertising anything...

Best wishes ZeljkoZblace (talk) 16:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

why you deletuin the edits i mades fors thes pagess — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clockjiggly69 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your note on my page

Thank you for your note. Please check the input of Ушкуйник and you will see that all his activities are dedicated to convert Ukrainian people (even most prominent) into Russians. Please also check his talk page - he was blocked many times for such actions. Could you help?--Viggen (talk) 17:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Trolls and their diet

Re this page which you moved to project space: just as a heads-up, it is part of a disruptive campaign by community banned user (User:Nsmutte) and per WP:BAN should simply be deleted without further ado. It is a prolific troll who feeds on a diet of good-faith efforts to help them :-( --bonadea contributions talk 17:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Bonadea! Yeah, I realized that after I moved the page from the Wikipedia_talk namespace to the Wikipedia namespace. Oops, I helped feed him. Oh well, it will get taken care of. Thanks for applying the CSD tag and for letting me know. Definitely a illegitimate SPI report created for the purpose of disrupting/trolling :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

No harm done :-) That particular user is rather familiar to me right now... just waiting for him to give up at some point! --bonadea contributions talk 17:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Bonadea - No worries; he'll tire out soon. Heck, you should see all the vandalism, insults, and trashing that happens to my talk page. It's normal for me, and if you haven't gotten used to it, you will ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

alan f daniels

Dear,

we added two documents to the page. One is a judgement against Daniels for fraud and one is the record from Nevada that his company'ss predecessor was forfeited. We have tried several times to add this information to the page. The information is correct and negative, but Alan Daniels is fooling people by not disclosing this on "his" Wlipedia site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.44.0.15 (talk) 17:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You deserve one!! Winterysteppe (talk) 18:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Winterysteppe! Thank you for taking the time to leave me this barnstar and for the kind words. I very much appreciate it! I haven't run into you in some time; I hope you're doing well and that your day has been more eventful than mine. I'll definitely run into you again; until then, happy editing Winterysteppe! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Ted Cruz

Stop reverting my edits you Kenny G look alike. Ted Cruz is the zodiac and you know it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bfeehan19 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

stop spamming Winterysteppe (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

drainage basin

Lateral and vertical processes of drainage basin77.246.49.31 (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Everything I wrote was true

I gave a nod to hastings college wonderful students and campus. But as a weyer hall resident, I can say, with certainity, that everything I added to the page is concrete facts as I have slipped on hair grease, theres many kids who don't shower(we've kept a chart), and I have personally killed the rats in my own room. I implore you to allow my ramifications to be published, if anything, to ignite change. Please pray to whatever god you worship and you'll know this to be true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amoney157 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Amoney157 - Minus the fact that it appears disruptive, there are a few things wrong with your edit to Hastings College. It is unreferenced (see Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources and citing sources), doesn't adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view guidelines, and also constitutes original research, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. If you want to contribute constructively, you should start at Wikipedia's tutorial page. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:44, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Content of page replaced not removed

Hey Oshwah, you left a message on our talk page saying we removed a content from Wikipedia talk:File Upload wizard. We actually replaced it, not removed it. --Lahore to Karachi (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hey dude, I made an image change to the page for Oregon State Senator Tim Knopp. All I did was replace an arguably goofy image with his official head shot from the Oregon Legislature. I should have made a note, but forgot to.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RB2013 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, RB2013! Yeah, sorry about that. I realized afterwards what you were trying to do, and I restored the page back. Please let me know if I can do anything else for you. Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

You removed my edit

This is uncool man. I was just editing like i normally do but you come up in here like you own the place. That edit is 100% factually a fact. I get that my name is Trump fan but it doesn't mean you can be a racist bigot. I speak the truth, I will most likely make my edit back and if you remove it i will continue to message you. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trump fan (talk • contribs) 21:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi

WHO ARE YOU AND I AM LILLY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.48.24.230 (talk) 23:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello Oshwah. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3), or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at LawnStarter Lawn Care Service. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. IagoQnsi (talk) 23:17, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

IagoQnsi - Aww crap, I did it again, didn't I? Yes... Thank you for keeping an eye out and for letting me know. I have a habit of not double-checking the creation sometimes... I'll keep better note in the future. Thanks again. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Sure thing. I have the same problem. :P Cheers, IagoQnsi (talk) 23:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Text entered into part 3 instead of Part 2

Hello Oshwah The text I entered for Part 3 was for Part 2.. easy mistake to make when you have multiple sequels — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.144.230 (talk) 23:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Final Fantasy 0

I thank you for deleting my post. I had taken a quick photo for a project I had. I know this information shouldn't be used for an experiment, but it was necessary for a grade. Thank you also because I would have forgotten to delete it, so thank you again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.240.245 (talk) 00:00, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

No problem. In the future, you'll want to use the sandbox for those kind of edits. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

its sarah. please don't delete my changes. thx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.185.115.32 (talk) 00:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

108.185.115.32 - Sorry, but that's not how it works here. Your claim of being the article subject is something that cannot be verified here, Ownership of articles is something that does not exist on Wikipedia and is not recognized, and the content you're adding is not referenced, and per Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people, unreferenced content can be removed (and unreferenced controversial information must be removed). Your changes must adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and changes that do not do so can be removed. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Zaros

Hi i've been playing runescape for 10 years now and know a lot about the gods. But i will try to find a source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.95.24.153 (talk) 01:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 87.95.24.153 - Yes, please do! This will be needed, since simply adding content due to your first hand knowledge isn't allowed (it's original research). Adding a reliable source will absolutely be needed in this situation! Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Ben Nevis

You have reverted my edit to this article. Here is a source showing that current height you ahve reverted to is now out of date. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35837773?SThisFB Liamcalling (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Liamcalling! Ah, perfect! You just need to cite it within the article. Then you'll be good to go! If you have questions regarding the guideline I linked to you, please do not hesitate to ask. I'll be happy to help! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:11, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

I've now added that source in place of the old (now incorrect) source. Idon't know what you mean about the fact that you have linked to a guidelin. I think our messages have sort of crossed. Are you happy with it now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liamcalling (talk • contribs) 02:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Liamcalling - Looks good! Thanks man! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:46, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Oshwah. Liamcalling (talk) 02:58, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Liamcalling - You bet! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

A removed edit

you said

"Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gender inequality in the United States with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:25, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gender inequality in the United States. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 03:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC)"

firstly I would like to point out that I explained my edit fairly well. At least fairly well, for the low character limit. I explained (this is not a direct quote) that i changed the inaccurate and one sided information that was previously there. I had said that i changed it to something that had been examined from more than "women make this much, men make this much" to something more of "examining the wage gap from more than just gender reveals the wage gap to be around 4.8% to 7% and not the inaccurate 20%". Secondly I would like to make the point that this is not my personal observation, i added a source in another edit (it was a couple minutes later because i had forgotten to add it with my first edit). the information i got the first paragraph from is this link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html my second paragraph i seem to have lost the link to the source of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The only truth-teller (talk • contribs) 03:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

The only truth-teller - You made two edits to Gender inequality in the United States: this one, and this one. In both of these edits, you removed content in the article that was referenced by a reliable source (the American Journal of Sociology). You then replaced it with content that was opinionated and not referenced at all. For example, you added this text: "supposedly a woman is paid 20% less than a man for the same job. This is, to some extent, true. Women do on average make 20% less than men. This factor, however, has nothing to do with sexism, yet it is the different career choices that causes this false wage gap." - this injects a point of view that does not align with Wikipedia's policy regarding the need to edit in a neutral point of view. If you had instead referenced studies that showed this to be a contributing factor, and added the text in a manner that was neutral and spoke about these studies, that would be different. But you did not. So, yes. I reverted your changes back to the revision that was referenced by a source, and did not contain opinionated commentary that was not neutral. I highly recommend that you review Wikipedia's guidelines on citing reliable sources, as well as Wikipedia's policy on editing in a neutral point of view (linked earlier). This will help you with conforming to Wikipedia's guidelines, and will answer your questions. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

My apologies

I didn't mean to revert your edit. I was trying to revert the message that the anonymous user posted, but I see you reverted it before I did. Sorry about that. NYBrook098 (talk) 04:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

NYBrook098 - Don't be sorry! It's your talk page. You can revert my edits if you want to. It won't hurt my feelings. Well... maybe a little bit. :-P ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Oshwah - It was vandalism on my talk page. Don't worry about it you did the right thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NYBrook098 (talk • contribs)

NYBrook098 - I know, I was just messing with you :-D. It's good to bump into you and talk to you again. Hope things are going well :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Oshwah - You too. NYBrook098 (talk) 04:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hi,

this is Daisy Lewis! I was trying to update my wiki page but don't really know how....

can you help?

xx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.22.13 (talk) 05:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

86.157.22.13 - The reason I reverted your changes was because you did not cite any reliable sources with the content that you added. Articles that are biographies of living people undergo very tight scrutiny with content and the requirement to provide reliable sources with things that are added. So long as you follow the links to the guides that I've provided for you in this response, you'll be fine. Please read them, and let me know if you have questions about the guidelines that I listed. I'll be happy to answer them and clarify any confusion. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Death of Kelly Thomas

Thank you for the talk page message. What was unconstructive about my edit to the page? I used the article's talk page to explain the edit. generic_hipster 07:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Generic hipster - Your edit to Death of Kelly Thomas was reverted because you didn't cite a reliable source when you stated that the person "was beaten by Jay Cicinelli". I apologize; I should have been more detailed with my message to you. But this was the reason that I reverted your change. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Well alright, but your revert restored some vandalism into the article. I will leave you to find it. Furthermore, WP:CITELEAD says avoid cites in the leading paragraph. generic_hipster 07:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't believe that I did. The previous version of the article was more neutral, referenced properly, and in-line with Wikipedia's policies compared to your revision. Read the guidelines I provided for you; you'll understand why after you do so. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

the part about him being tasered in the scrotum is vandalism introduced here. i went ahead and made some fixes to the article including removing the scrotum vandalism. generic_hipster 08:05, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

generic_hipster - You are absolutely correct. The edit that you referenced in your previous response appears to be possible vandalism, and I thank you for catching and reverting it. I will acknowledge this for absolute sure! :-) However... minus the possible vandalism that was added, I believe that the overall principle behind your content changes were not in-line with Wikipedia's guidelines, and I stand behind my original reasons for reverting the changes. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Re: Edited Table

Sorry, if it was rude for me to edit it out. But i found the citations to those tables to be biased. I had better sources in mind like articles and studies from pew research center. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RickyRolling (talk • contribs) 11:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Yo dude, just wonderin' why you take down mah contribution — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.23.111 (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

I have included reliable sources for all edits, clearly you cannot possibly have even bothered to check this.

The original article was at best misleading, and in reality, poor indeed.

Is there a more senior editor who monitors what you are doing? I think I need to talk to him/her.

Thanks,

Mok — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.49.116 (talk) 18:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

86.174.49.116 - What happened was that I accidentally reverted all of your changes instead of the particular one that I was intending to revert (and for that, I apologize). While your overall changes do include references (awesome!), there were a couple that caused me some slight concern (namely, these edits you made: [4], [5], [6], [7], and [8]). Some of these changes appear to be commentary, while others appear to be unreferenced. This is what I was trying to revert. If you have additional questions or concerns, please feel free to let me know. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Spurs head to head record

I saw that you reverted an edit by 180.191.135.142 for not citing, but it was also redundant, because I updated before he put that in on the paragraph above, which before last night said "winning or tied". The win over Portland last night gives them a winning record against every active franchise.

I don't know how to cite, but if you wish, the head to head results can be found here.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/SAS/head2head.html

Here's from The SA Express News site too.

http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/spurs/article/After-beating-Trail-Blazers-Spurs-now-have-6921122.php

Or NBA.com

http://stats.nba.com/featured/san_antonio_vs_everybody_2016_03_18.html?ls=nbahpfull3

Nevermind. I figured out how to add a citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.230.242.219 (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Friends Advice

Hi Oshwah

I was trying to delete the Wikipedia Listing for my home - Friends's Advice. I do not know how or why it was posted, but this property is a private home, not a public property. It should not be listed, described, or photographed on Wikipedia. Please help! Johnembry (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Johnembry, the property is on the National Register of Historic Places so it is of encyclopedic interest. On the application to the NRHP, you are not listed as the owner who was Albert Wedemeyer at the time of application. The Wedemeyer family occupied this property for over 200 years and helped with the process of the property achieving NRHP status.

You blanking the page will only result in your edits being reverted. I suggest you post a note at Wikipedia:OTRS noticeboard with your concerns. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

I second Liz's response; that is the proper place to go in order to have your concerns addressed. They are trained and properly equipped to verify your identity and assist you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Friends Advice

We have owned the property since November 2001. Purchased from the AW family. Anyone can verify this on property records of necessary. We did not authorize this listing, and for privacy and safety reasons, we do not want our house, or photos of it posted on Wiki. Please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnembry (talk • contribs) 21:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Johnembry - Liz and I have responded to the message you left previously (see above). You need to visit Wikipedia's Open Ticket Response System noticeboard, follow the directions, and you'll be able to communicate with someone who is equipped and trained to properly handle your particular concerns. This is what you need to do in order to receive proper assistance. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Woody Allen  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

   If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi Oswah,

It was not a mistake. The paragraph is in the wormg place since it refers to an interview of 2014, but is located together when describing what happened in 1892. It looks like Moses said from the beginning that Woody Allen did not molest Dylan when he never did say that until 2014. The article is already quoted two paragraphs later, when discussing the events of 2014, thus is it redundant.

In fact, the whole section cites articles in defense of Woody Allen and completely ignores the resolution of judge New York Supreme Court Justice Elliott Wilk in Woody Allen’s 1992 custody suit. There the judge completely oposes Allens arguments and vindicates Mia and Dylan Farrow. His resolution denies the custody even if addmitting that there are not enough proof for prosecution. The page shoule refelct both sides, not only Woody Allen's. That is what I was trying to achieve. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/10/inside-the-shocking-custody-case-court-documents-that-shed-light-on-the-dylan-farrow-woody-allen-saga.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAlitxu (talk • contribs) 12:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Request for Comment: Jeb Bush Portrait

There is an ongoing RfC at Talk: Jeb Bush which you may care to weigh in on. Spartan7W § 14:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Spartan7W! Thank you for letting me know about this RfC discussion. I've added a comment to it. Please feel free to let me know if there are more discussions like this that could use my input. I'll be happy to do so. Hope I get to run into you again soon. Cheers! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

reply105.112.10.230 (talk) 17:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

oshwan you are right and please be guiding me thanks you have a nice evening i hope we can be chating at times but are u female or male

deletion

hi am fankama oshwah please what is wrong with my construction if you dont mind can you tell me my correction thanks18:07, 19 March 2016 (UTC)105.112.10.230 (talk)

105.112.10.230 - Your edit here didn't appear constructive for many reasons. Is he a King? And if not, this implies a non-neutral change to the article because it can imply a good or favorable view. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Content from Niccolò Ferrari changed

Hello Oshwah, As you see from the difference between revisions i deleted a table with result's i inserted few minutes before.

Some descriptions in the tables were in italian and i decided to translate it before re-publishing it. The new table will be formatted in a single table containing the year despite the previous one which containded a single section for every year. I'll reinsert the table as soon as possibile.(Kayakko (talk) 08:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC))

La Familia Burron edit

The modification I made according to my interpretation of the original spanish article cited in the wikipedia page, was right, 'mil' in spanish means thousand and not as in english, million, so by changing that word I believe it makes the meaning the same as in the original article.

201.153.254.223 (talk) 22:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.15.128.81 (talk) 07:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit "unconstructive" after 2 warns sent against the account.

What was so "unconstructive" about it?

I have just let them know about it and just now warned them because they didn't fix it.

I don't know why I need a signature ~Malachq (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Malachq - There is nothing wrong with having a user page in another language, so long as it's not advertising, blatant copyright infringement, or breaking other rules that deem it inappropriate for a user page. See Wikipedia's guidelines on user pages for more information. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

edits /and getting my page linked

"'" i hope i am doing this part right, and i am not so computer savvy, as i wish !please help me with all the information to make this as easy as you can please ( i have a learning disability - i like to think i am ahead of the learning worlds understanding lol - but it just makes it hard to learn for me !) i have a web store and i market adult toys and videos. i understand that getting my site linked to a wikipedia a a a listing will help with my traffic and my trusted site status. but how do i go about linking my site to all the listings in wikipedia i can? please can you help me to do this? SinfulSindy (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)sinfulsindy

SinfulSindy - Have you created this page yet? There are a couple issues with what you are trying to do. First of all, there's conflict of interest; obviously, you have a personal connection with this subject. Working on article subjects where you have a conflict of interest is highly discouraged behavior, as it makes it nearly impossible for you to adhere to a neutral point of view when working on the article. The best thing to do with the article subject (as well as linking other articles to it) is to not do it yourself, but let others do it who do not have a conflict of interest. If you want to request the article be created for you, add it to Wikipedia's requested articles page. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my edits

I don't know why you won't let me update the Windows 10 edition page. Stop reverting my edits. You cannot upgrade from Windows 10 Enterprise to Windows 10 Enterprise. I don't need a source. Trust me. Anyone who can read and think like a human would understand that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Locke411 (talk • contribs)

Locke411 - Your edits here and here (and now here, as you've reverted your changes yet again) - is not supported by a reliable source. If your change is correct and performing an in-place upgrade from the same Operating System to the exact same Operating System is not possible, then you need to provide a source that says that it isn't possible. I'm going to start a discussion on the article's talk page. Instead of reverting and causing an edit war, please discuss your concerns there. Remember that it is up to the editor who makes the change to provide a source when asked to. "Trust me, I know" doesn't count. It is original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

I understand that this is resolved after another party also said that you cannot logically upgrade from one version to the same version. I wouldn't cite a source if I say that A does not equal A. I would just say that is intuitively obvious. I also wouldn't cite a source for a grammar change, or cite a source correcting a mathematical error. Not all changes need citations. I am not making a factual claim, but a logical conclusion, and a simple one at that. Locke411 (talk) 16:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Locke411 - Indeed! I appreciate the discussion, and I thank you for your patience and for participating. Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing the Windows_10_editions page

Stop vandalizing the Windows_10_editions page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Locke411 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Locke411 - See my previous response above. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Peter Brown Change removal.

Peter Brown died today. He was friends with Roy Rogers and Dale Evans. Their granddaughter Julie is a friend of mine and a friend of Peter Brown and his family. She posted about his death with personal condolences to his wife and children.

Is that enough of a source? I'm new to editing wikipedias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BobbosH (talk • contribs) 21:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

BobbosH - Unfortunately it is not. Your "personal knowledge" of people that know the person constitutes original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. If or when a reliable source publishes a news story or article discussing the event, then the information can be added here. Another guideline you should review is Wikipedia's biographies of living people page. It explains that such information that is unreferenced (or poorly referenced) must be removed immediately and on-sight. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Thank you! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Warhammer Online: Age of Reckonging

Can you please explain further why my edit was deleted? I believe that people coming to read about the game they loved to play would also love to know that there is a private server available to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.255.161.20 (talk) 21:40, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

That is because the external link, as well as the manner in which you described it, can appear to constitute advertising, and doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

So Return of Reckoning should have it's own Wiki page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.255.161.20 (talk) 21:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

It depends. If it meets Wikipedia's verifiability and notability guidelines, then it could be included as an article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

You removed my edit

"Just wanted to know if you read content of the page? Did you agree with how it was written? I was just doing research when I saw it." Bobhatesracists (talk) 21:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Why?

why did you remove my post? I wanted ppl to know about me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stlydle (talk • contribs) 22:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Stlydle - Wikipedia is not a place for pranks or self-promotion. Please see what Wikipedia is not for more information. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

regarding my edit

"Hello Oshwah, I left you a message earlier about an edit I made on one of the articles "History of the race and intelligence controversy". In your previous messages to other users You have maintained that you want to ensure "Wikipedia neutrality". The article that I am referring to clearly promotes the principle of "genetic deference in I.Q. with a positive spin on well known eugenics supporters, some of whom are known german supporters during second world war. When opposing points of view are discussed they are mostly accompanied by terms such as, " known Marxist" and " left wing". If you could suggest a better way for me to point out that an article in WIKIPEDIA that clearly supports that people of african origin are intellectually deficient and eugenics was a well thought out principle by people of good intentions, please let me know. Sincerely..."

Bobhatesracists (talk) 22:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Nirvana wiki

Hello, I was the one who changed the Nirvana page and added pat smear as a band member. I do want to say that Pat Smear (that is now in foo fighters) was a part of Nirvana in 1993, he joined Nirvana to be a rhythm guitarist in 1993 for there MTV unplugged performance, and a after that he joined the band officially. To be honest, because Nirvana aren't together anymore I think you should put Kurt, Krist and Dave in the "Past members" box. Or at least add Pat in the members box.

Thank you, Jonathan.

I was attacked

Did you look at the comment? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACassianto&type=revision&diff=711443746&oldid=711435776 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.123.85 (talk) 22:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

IP, that's not an attack, so.man up, drop the stock and move on. SchroCat (talk) 22:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Help on Scott Bradlee / Postmodern Jukebox pages

Hey Oshwah -- Thanks for your help today with the Scott Bradlee page. I've created a new breakout page for Scott Bradlee's popular band, "Postmodern Jukebox," and I deleted the band member info from the "Scott Bradlee" page because I moved it over to the new page I've just created for the band (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodern_Jukebox). I thought it would be redundant to have the band member info on the page "about Scott" ... and rather, that it made more sense over on the band page. Also, I had made a quite a few corrections to Scott's bio (which seemed incorrect, but you just reverted back as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writer1977 (talk • contribs) 23:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Does this make sense for these two respective pages? Can you advise? Writer1977 (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah -- Just following up on this. Could you reply back? Writer1977 (talk) 17:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Writer1977! I apologize for the delay getting back to you. I just saw this edit, where you removed references without explaining why using an edit summary. In the future, using an edit summary will help other editors to know and understand what you're doing and why. That was my only concerns. If you feel that the removal was valid, by all means ... please feel free to remove the information (especially if it's redundant). Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey Oshway -- When you have a moment, would you mind looking again at the "Scott Bradlee" page and seeing if my edit summary is apporpriate? I've gone in an re-edited the page. Also, please note, the removed information about Postmodern Jukebox (lower down on the page) now lives over on the newly-created PMJ page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodern_Jukebox Writer1977 (talk) 18:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

POV and weasel words...

Why is it white supremacy to oppose white genocide, but not black supremacy to oppose black genocide? POV of both articles implies the latter is more accurate, that is to say more accepted viewpoint, of a conspiracy theory than the former, leading the reader to believe the latter in lieu of the former. The former article is bare-bones and reads like an ADL pamphlet. How liberal is wikipedia supposed to be? 75.171.212.134 (talk) 23:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Signed

Because "let's treat everyone equally" really isn't genocide for white people, while the West has historically engaged in a number of activities that resulted in the deaths of countless black people. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

maybe a little more civil

Although I'm still upset at your approach of just removing everything added to a page... I'll attempt to justify the changes I made to your *%^* page that requested additional citations. I had added the only known united states directory(via Hostsearch) for web hosting providers and I had added another page that referenced the top hosting providers. I will agree that the last one may not have been needed for clarifications. However, I did contribute to your page by adding the only source available on the internet that can verify the statement requesting a citation. If justification is what you call collaboration then there you go. /ragequit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.119.82.14 (talk) 23:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm referring to this edit you made. Not only is it uncivil, but it appears to be vandalism to a portal page. This is why I removed it and warned you for civility. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

and I'm "referring to" the edits that were made to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_web_hosting_service — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.119.82.14 (talk) 00:11, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I did not make the reversion to that page. If you have a dispute, please speak with KH-1, or discuss it on the article's talk page and ping KH-1 so that he can explain. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

thank you for pointing me in the right direction. I apologize to have taken up your time removing my comment meant for KH-1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.119.82.14 (talk) 00:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

No problem. Good luck! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

What?

"what do you mean about m edits? I thought they would've been awesome. and my teacher said that they did. so tell me! what did I do wrong?" Himinameisseiler (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)himinameisseiler

No subject

Hello. I made considerable edits , all properly explained, however I forgot to remove some references and got an auto generated message telling me so. When I clicked to automatically 'fix' it reverted all the changes I had made and explained. I was just redoing them - as they had already been explained the first time I did it before the mistake I didn't do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.196.80 (talk) 00:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Ah, no worries then. You just removed content without explaining why using the edit summary. In the future, I highly recommend that you do that. It will avoid confusion with other editors that review changes, and will save you time and frustration (such as this) :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

I Tried Hard But Thanks have A good Night. 68.102.40.154 (talk) 01:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Ah, after reviewing your changes and noticing the net positive details you've added, I've restored the previous material. Please let me know if you need anything else.

Thank You And Good Night Have A Happy Easter. 68.102.40.154 (talk) 01:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

You bet! Sorry about the confusion. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

The Patient Award

here is a cup of tea since you watched an entertaining amount of spam on your talk page Winterysteppe (talk) 04:13, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Winterysteppe! HA, thanks for the cup of tea. Just another average day of fun on my talk page :-P ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Sempra Energy Changes

Hello Oshwa,

I realized that I forgot to leave comments on my edits. I redid my edits and gave an explanation. I included the example of Google in my edit comments to show that it isn't fair to label companies with such an obvious bias. What happened was fact but it's quite obvious that the intent of putting such a description was to discredit SoCal Gas. I have no ties with the company and feel that my edits were justified as I am trying to keep neutral tones as per Wikipedia's culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CorruptTheory (talk • contribs) 04:28, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Re: Water horse

I realize now I should have cited the information about the meaning of Morvarc'h instead of just borrowing it from the Gradlon page (I don't know what I was thinking), but was there also something wrong with the hippocamp link change? I changed it to avoid a redirect, which I thought was what we're supposed to do. I'm really trying to suck less at this. Input welcome. Thanks. 64.72.65.120 (talk) 08:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure why I reverted your edits. This must have been done accidentally. I've restored your changes. Please accept my apologies! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

No apology necessary, I really admire and appreciate all the hard work you put in for the community. I'm not sure yet how to (nor am I sure if I can) give you tea and cookies like other people have done, but I want you to know that I would if I were able. Thanks for responding! 64.72.65.120 (talk) 05:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

You're very welcome. It was a pleasure assisting you. Hey, you should create an account! Come join us as a member and help us build Wikipedia! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:56, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Islamic medical help

Hi Oshwah,

Don't you think the claim about an Islamic resurgence aiding medicine needs to be elaborated upon? I understand if my edit was too opinionated.

Richard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rculprobinson (talk • contribs) 11:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Rculprobinson - Thanks for leaving me a message. Yes, your edit here didn't appear to be in a neutral point of view. If there is content in the article that is clearly opinionated and not cited by reliable references, or appears to speak in the first person (i.e. "I believe", or "This is not true") without referencing studies or sources, they should be removed. Please let me know if you have any questions about Wikipedia's neutral point of view guidelines. I'll be happy to answer them :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Removal of material from the site of Karl Peters

Hi Oshwah,

Thanks for contacting me by email. The website we are talking about is mine. Some months ago, someone replaced my picture with that of a person who reminds me of Hitler. I'm not used to editing of wikipedia and so did nothing and forgot about it. However, yesterday, I tried to to the edit to replace the picture, and I added some recent material.

I did this after I logged in, and so assumed that I could do this.

Since you appear to have removed the material I added, would you please restore it.

Also, I would appreciate very much a tutorial on the correct way to do this.

Best wishes,

Karl Karl E. Peters — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl Peters (talk • contribs) 13:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Karl Peters! Thanks for leaving me a message with your questions and request for assistance! I'll be happy to help you out! Your edit removed an infobox from the article completely, and also added content that was not cited by a reliable source. This is why I reverted the change that you made. If you're looking to add a picture, you can simply insert it as you did. I just wouldn't remove the infobox ;-). If you need help with citing sources, the two links I provided in the previous sentence will assist you. If you have questions about them, please let me know. Thanks, and happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah,

Thanks for returning the material to the inbox on my cite. I was trying to get rid of the picture, which is not me, and when I clicked on it, the entire inbox was highlighted. I found the proper home for the picture on this site https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wegberg . The picture was taken in 1930, nine years before I was born. I believe it was uploaded to my site some time ago. Can you remove it for me. I would like to put up a correct one. Karl Peters (talk) 00:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Would you mind explaining why you reverted my edits? The section was merely a number of similarities between the film's songs and some other foreign ones. I'm not endeavoring to attack you, in any way. I would sheerly like you to inform me of why you performed the aforementioned task. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heisenberg The White (talk • contribs) 15:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Assistance with uploading official logo to page

Hi

I need some assistance uploading the official school logo to a page. I have the authorization to do so, however, I would like to add a Non-free media information and use rationale. After all, it is the official logo and we wouldn't want any copyright issues.

Thanks

SUHSD-SUH (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Economy Of Africa

"My writing was correct. Most people believe Africa is poor, but it is actually rich. This is true. Please change the article. You can add any thing you want, but please include that Africa used to be poor but now rich." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CEA5:2770:7114:689:A22E:BAF1 (talk) 21:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	I'm running into you all the time! Nice job on countering vandalism. I can't catch everything, and Cluebot NG is nowhere to be found today. Peter Sam Fan 22:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Peter SamFan! I wanted to express my sincere appreciation to you for taking the time to leave me this barnstar and your kind words - thank you :-). Patrolling vandalism has it's challenges, but hey... someone's gotta do it! Again, thanks for the barnstar. It's a pleasure to shake hands with you, and I wish you happy editing. Until we meet again :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Peter Sam Fan 22:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry

Hay man I my appolgy Justincorr (talk) 22:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Harvey's broiler-Johnie's Broiler Page

Hi there Oshwah,

              Received your message regarding the re-edit of the Johnie's Broiler page that I along wrote with several other members of the groups that actually saved saved 'HARVEY'S broiler-JOHNIE'S broiler from complete demolition.  The reason for the re-edit of the page is that when it was put up, one of our members only labeled it as a JOHNIE'S broiler when in fact to was most famous as HARVEY'S broiler from 1958 when built to 1968 when the owner Harvey Ortner had to step back from running the concern due to health issues,in doing so while continuing to own the property, he leased the business to The Johnson Family who changed the signage to Johnie's Broiler hence the one N in Johnie and the mascot "Fat Boy" which was brought over in conjunction with a sister restaurant that was purchased in 1967 also named Johnie's (in lower case).

The terms of the lease were never met and Harvey Ortner had legally retain control of the restaurants property until his death, at which time Christos Smyrniotis assumed management along with his brothers George and Steve. It is important to note that in the Smyrniotis management of the property that it changed ownership to Christos and that that restaurant was closed down on 31,December 2001 and subsequently leased to a car dealership that was supposed to retain the restaurant as a business as well which never happened. The tenant "Car Outlet" was to have a 10 year lease of the property. The signage was still on the building as a restaurant,but doing business as a car dealership. The tenant violated his lease agreement by removing fixtures and terazo tile by jbroiler-Jack hammering out counter step and gutting the building.

This was brought to the attention of the City of Downey and a stop work order was issued, Key elements of HARVEY'S broiler-JOHNIE'S broiler were being destroyed.. This building qualified and was granted landmark status, but did not received it's plaque with # due to the property owners claim of economic hardship. several years went by and in August of 2006 a new tenant and lease was signed. In November of 2006 the tenant Ardas Yanek applied for in "Christos Smyniotis'" name and denied a permit for demolition on the grounds that it did not contain the required Environmental Impact Report.

On the afternoon of January 7, 2007 a crime occurred when Mr Yanek took it upon himself to hire machinery-equipment and perform an Illegal Demolition on a Sunday Afternoon with the employment of day laborers from the local home improvement center. Most of this information is covered in the page as it was originally written. It has been edited as a result of changes in history over the course of 9 years since the demolition occurred and when JKBBD-Big Boy Restaurants-Jim Louder assumed control of the property in April of 2008. The edited version contains information that is current and factual. Please update Wikipedia Johnie's Broiler page to include what I have edited as HARVEY'S broiler is a part of AMERICAN HISTORY and the CALIFORNIA CAR CULTURE.

Sincerest Thanks, Kevin Preciado Lead-Coalition To Save and Rebuild HARVEY'S broiler. Former Automotive Activities Coordinator-Bob's Big Boy Broiler 2009-2014.

A cheeseburger for you!

Hey there. I am sending this as a sort cumulative "thank you". I've seen a couple of your contributions and thought it is best to send this instead of spamming your notification channel with several "Thanks".

Keep up the good work! Fleet Command (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Fleet Command! Thanks for taking the time to buy me a burger! Sorry it took me so long to get back to you; I've been very busy lately. Again, I appreciate the wikilove! See you out there! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Some users again trying to defame Sujit Meher article

Dear Oshwah,

Its really sad to see people keep trying to defame public figure articles again and again. As i said earlier again some users keep trying to defame Sujit Meher article. And you promised me to eye on such issue. Please kindly go though the link, he has been listed among those top 10 alumni of NIFT, and even published in NIFT official website. So no need of any deletion request or debate on this particular article. ^[1] Please i request you kindly protect such article, where people keep trying to defame such public figure articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novelbuzz (talk • contribs) 03:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Impulse (body mist)

Hi Oshwah,

I recently received a message about an edit in the Impulse (body mist) wiki. I did not edit that page nor have I ever seen that Wiki article. I'll register a Wikipedia account to prevent future misadressed messages. Thomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.61.128.86 (talk) 21:26, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Table/List not showing...

"List of benzodiazepines"

"The below tables contain a sample list of benzodiazepines and.."

Dear sir, the list referenced on this page does not display at all in the mobile-version, even with cookies enabled and several page refreshes.

It does show up in the desktop-version on a mobile device, but difficult to view/read.

Thankyou 2607:FB90:2706:E40E:983E:61EF:EB7A:5CCD (talk) 03:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

This can occasionally happen on the mobile versions of Wikipedia. Have you tried downloading and installing the Wikipedia app from the app store on your mobile device? Using the Wikipedia app may do you better than using the browser that's on your device. Give that a try, and see if this doesn't resolve your issues. Good luck! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

About Contribs

Hello Oshwa

How "Contribs" works?

Thanks.

Best Regards 122.3.232.198 (talk) 01:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

All edits and contributions are kept in a list by all IP addresses and users. To see the list of your contributions, just click here. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

restoring the content of Draft LGBT ageing

Hi Oshwah, You restored the content of Draft LGBT ageing but it's been in the main articlespace for 3 months now. Why would people continue to work on a draft when they can modify the article? I wanted to delete the whole draft page but it didn't work. I don't know how to do it. If you know how, thanks for doing it. MaudeG3 (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, MaudeG3! If there's a draft where an article exists, and there's nothing new in the draft that the article doesn't have, you can tag if for speedy deletion. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albani

All the posts that you deleted already have inline citations provided.

^[2]

^[3]

^[4]

References

^ http://www.nift.ac.in/alumni_2015.html
^ Jacob Olidort, [1]. Brookings Institution, Analysis Paper No.18, February 2015, "The Politics of “Quietist” Salafism", pg 14
^ Abu Rumman, Mohammad; Abu Hanieh, Hassan. Jordanian Salaﬁsm: A Strategy for the “Islamization of Society”and an Ambiguous Relationship with the State (PDF). Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. p. 43. ISBN 9780674049642. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help) Dec 2010
^ "King Faisal Foundation: Biography of Sheikh Mohammad Nasir Ad-Din Al-Albani"

Edits on "Dublin Metropolitan Police" (approx 01.30, London UK time)

Hello, Oshwah:

Please bear with me as I'm new to editing in Wikipedia and have only just set up a user account.

I made two edits which you say you have changed:

_ the first was to change one word, "infamously", to "famously", with regard to Edward Broy. I did so in the interests of fairness and impartiality, and I don't believe that needs a citation !! However, if a source *is* needed, material on the career of Broy may be found in "Michael Collins _ The Lost Leader" by Margery Forester (a New Zealand historian).

_ the second was to expand on the existing paragraph about the depiction of Broy (and his fictional death) in the 1996 film "Michael Collins". I didn't list a source, partly because I don't know how, but mainly because everything I said is based on Wikipedia's own page "Dick McKee" (which begins: " Richard “Dick” McKee (Irish name Risteárd Mac Aoidh; 4 April 1893 – 21 November 1920)... " _ in case you're searching for it).

I would be grateful if you could restore my edits.

Regards, Vulture. Vulture999 (talk) 00:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

[1] ttp://www.nift.ac.in/alumni_2015.html

[Olidort-2] Jacob Olidort, [1]. Brookings Institution, Analysis Paper No.18, February 2015, "The Politics of “Quietist” Salafism", pg 14

[3] Abu Rumman, Mohammad; Abu Hanieh, Hassan. Jordanian Salaﬁsm: A Strategy for the “Islamization of Society”and an Ambiguous Relationship with the State (PDF). Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. p. 43. ISBN 9780674049642. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help) Dec 2010

[4] "King Faisal Foundation: Biography of Sheikh Mohammad Nasir Ad-Din Al-Albani"

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]