Latent Altruism Theory — altruistic tendencies remain dormant until activated by specific environmental, social, or biological triggers. These triggers may include life-threatening crises, emotional appeals, or shared group identities, transform latent impulses into observable altruistic actions. The theory distinguishes latent altruism from general prosocial actions by focusing on its conditional nature. It highlights subconscious and situational mechanisms that drive activation.
Research emphasis the multifaceted triggers of latent altruism. Environmental crises, such as ecological disasters, activate latent altruism by fostering environmentally conscious actions (Xu et al., 2021).
Ecocentrism Highlights the intrinsic value of ecosystems beyond their utility to humans. This perspective aligns with the activation of latent altruism by encouraging individuals to adopt sustainable behaviors and participate in conservation efforts. Motivated by a moral responsibility to protect the environment, such triggers transform dormant altruistic tendencies into proactive actions (Anders et al., 2023).
Biological Level --- neural mechanisms associated with empathy and prosocial decision-making play a crucial role in transforming latent altruism into observable behaviors, highlighting the interaction between subconscious processes and external stimuli (Abrosimova et al., 2023)
illustrate early human group cooperation, reflecting the evolutionary triggers of altruistic tendencies in survival contexts.
Charles Darwin in The Descent of Man (1871) argued that humans developed moral instincts through natural selection to strengthen group cohesion under the pressures of intergroup competition. These instincts are not always actively displayed but can be triggered in situations requiring collective effort. Although Darwin did not explicitly frame his ideas in terms of latent altruism, individuals might unconsciously prioritize tribal welfare over personal benefit during crises, motivated by the reinforcement of group survival.
In the mid-20th century, psychology and behavioural economics researchers identified situational triggers that elicit prosocial behaviours. Latent Trait theory (LTT) offered a framework for analysing dormant traits like altruism, which manifest under specific environmental or emotional conditions (Steyer et al., 1999). LTT posits that latent traits result from stable individual characteristics and dynamic situational factors. For instance, stress or shared threats can prompt altruistic behaviours that typically remain inactive.
In the 1970s, Richard Dawkins' The Selfish Gene (1976) expanded on W.D. Hamilton’s kin selection theory to explore how altruistic behaviours might remain dormant until activated by specific circumstances. Dawkins argued that kin selection could lead to latent altruistic tendencies that manifest only when external triggers like kinship cues or collective threats arise.
The activation of latent altruism often depends on subconscious mechanisms. Research indicates that subliminal cues can elicit generosity without conscious awareness, suggesting that external stimuli can activate latent prosocial tendencies (Andersson et al., 2016).
Subtle psychological processes and contextual triggers interacting with the subconscious are crucial in shaping and activating latent altruistic behavior (Pfattheicher et al., 2021).
Latent altruism emerges predominantly under life-threatening conditions, where genetic imperatives significantly influence unconscious decision-making processes. During emergencies, individuals demonstrate a heightened propensity to prioritise assistance for close relatives, motivated by an instinctive drive to preserve shared genetic material (Dawkins, 1976; Kay, Lehmann, & Keller, 2019).
Coordinated flood rescue efforts highlight the activation of latent altruism during crises.
Research indicates that collective responses during floods are shaped by urgent environmental conditions. These situations drive individuals to engage in coordinated rescues, reflecting social norms that prioritize communal welfare. Environmental pressures act as triggers, turning dormant altruistic tendencies into visible actions (Dezecache, 2015; Kirschenbaum & Rapaport, 2020).
Latent altruism is often activated by reputational pressures, as individuals seek to avoid social penalties or enhance their social standing in communal settings. Research on climate action shows that publicly disclosing the names of individuals who fail to follow conservation regulations motivates adherence to social norms for environmental protection. This activation mechanism leverages reputational concerns to match individual behaviours with societal norms (Constantino et al., 2022).
Another study demonstrates that individuals are more motivated to share high-quality implicit knowledge when they feel enhances their social status. This finding suggests how the desire for social recognition can activate dormant altruistic tendencies (Park et al., 2017).
Cultural traditions and shared identities activate latent altruism by fostering cooperation and mutual support in collective challenges
A strong sense of group identity increases the likelihood of latent altruism, particularly in collective threats or shared challenges. Individuals with a strong connection to their group are more likely to prioritize group welfare through latent altruistic behaviours, such as donations during crises. Ethnic identity functions as an extension of kinship and acts as a powerful trigger for latent altruism. Shared cultural markers such as language and religion foster trust and cooperation within the group. During intergroup conflicts or resource competition, these shared markers activate dormant altruistic tendencies, reinforcing group cohesion and survival strategies (Van den Berghe, 1987). This finding aligns with Henri Tajfel's Social Identity Theory, which emphasises the role of group affiliation in shaping actions that prioritise group welfare in response to external threats (Zheng et al., 2021).
Through public speaking and social evaluation tasks, the Trier Social Stress Test creates physiological conditions that enable the expression of dormant altruistic tendencies. Elevated cortisol levels interact with oxytocin to enhance social responsiveness, increasing the likelihood of altruistic behaviours under stress (Frisch et al., 2015; Haucke et al., 2022). Individuals with high empathy or resilience exhibit a stronger oxytocin-cortisol interaction, which reduces the activation threshold for latent altruism. Conversely, declined cortisol production in repulsion women during stress tasks has been shown to inhibit the activation of these altruistic tendencies, proving the variability of biological responses across contexts (Haucke et al., 2022; Weik et al., 2017).
Dopamine and Reward Processing: Dopamine pathways enhanced would be promoting the activation of latent altruism when individuals receive social recognition or emotional validation for their altruistic behaviours. This process transforms dormant altruistic tendencies into proactive actions by linking neural rewards to socially beneficial outcomes (Hill et al., 2017).
Oxytocin strengthens social sensitivity, facilitating the activation of latent altruistic tendencies in cooperative contexts.Oxytocin and Social Sensitivity: Oxytocin significantly contributes to the activation of latent altruism by enhancing sensitivity to distress cues. Furthermore, it increased empathy enabling dormant altruistic tendencies to manifest during situations requiring social support or cooperation through empathy (Tusche & Bas, 2021).
Testosterone and Group Dynamics: Observed under competitive conditions, which reflected how testosterone-driven group dynamics activate latent altruistic tendencies that otherwise remain dormant. These findings demonstrate that latent altruism can be contextually driven by biological mechanisms and the social environment (Reimers et al., 2019).
Eestrogen and Vasopressin Pathways: Recent studies emphasise the interaction between estrogenic receptors and neuropeptides (vasopressin), which Increase sensitivity to the pain of others by enhancing emotional resonance and strengthening social bonding. This evidence demonstrates how the oestrogen-vasopressin hormonal pathway, when triggered by specific emotional stimuli, facilitates the transformation of latent altruistic tendencies into observable actions (Wu & Han, 2021).
Integration of Signals in the Brain: The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and anterior insula dynamically integrate neurochemical signals with environmental stimuli, enabling the activation of latent altruism in response to situational demands (Hill et al., 2017).
Ethical Reasoning: Behavioural economists have extensively studied this example using dictator game experiments, revealing how specific cues can activate dormant altruism tendencies. Capraro in 2019 indicated that introducing moral boost (reminders to act fairly) significantly increased altruistic resource allocation. These findings suggest that latent altruism is not consistently observable, but highly responsive to contextual stimuli that produce ethical considerations. Moreover, the variability in altruistic behaviour influenced by recipient characteristics, such as shared identity, highlights the conditional aspects of latent altruism. This phenomenon manifests in the perceived alignment of social and moral unity.
Kin selection: Latent altruism is activated through the interaction of environmental cues and genetic predispositions, particularly in resource-scarce environments. As evolutionary pressures prioritise the survival of shared genetic material, individuals are more likely to assist close relatives. Unlike generalised altruism, latent altruism remains dormant until specific conditions (such as kinship ties or scarcity) provide sufficient stimuli for activation. This context-dependent expression highlights the validity of environmental signals in shaping latent altruistic behaviours (Kay et al., 2019).
Symbolic triggers (emotional appeals and personalized narratives) activate latent altruism by transforming abstract challenges into relatable experiences. Moral education strategies using examples or promoting effectively inspired altruistic responses by connecting individuals to broader ethical challenges (Engelen et al., 2018).
News stories with personalised narratives promote emotional identification and activate state empathy. They reduce psychological distance and enhance latent intentions to help (Wald et al., 2021).
Religious practices often activate latent altruism by emphasizing moral responsibility and collective welfare.
Religious beliefs activate latent altruism by reinforcing moral frameworks that emphasize collective welfare and social responsibility. Spirituality combines individual behaviours with communal obligations to promote values such as reciprocity and compassion. In religious contexts, latent altruistic tendencies are often triggered through prioritizing resource redistribution and supporting vulnerable groups, linking individual actions to moral duties (Suzuki & Miah, 2016; Guéguen et al., 2015; Anālayo & Dhammadinnā, 2021).
Shared risks, empathy, and urgency during crises (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic) amplified altruistic behaviours by activating dormant tendencies. Mutual aid networks, healthcare volunteering, and significant charitable donations emerged as individuals responded to external pressures like the demand for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and the need to support vulnerable populations. It certifies the widespread activation of latent altruism on a large scale (Lachowicz & Donaghey, 2021).
Emotional appeals and public recognition of contributions effectively activate latent altruism by leveraging emotional resonance and creating visible participation pathways. During crises, campaigns emphasizing solidarity instead of conventional charity created community-driven responses. These initiatives used urgent appeals and publicly acknowledged donors, which significantly increased engagement and activated latent altruism (Mould et al., 2022).
High-pressure organizational environments activate latent altruism by compelling employees to address shared challenges and risks. Individuals go beyond their formal roles to assist colleagues and are driven by the urgency of collective goals frequently in situations such as high-risk collaborative projects. This activation of latent altruism strengthens team cohesion and enhances overall efficiency, demonstrating how external stressors and mutual dependencies lower activation thresholds for altruistic behaviour (Scott & Unsworth, 2020).
Some critics argue that the external triggers were merely supplementary factors rather than decisive conditions in latent altruism theory. In contrast, prosocial theories are deemed to be many altruistic behaviours that naturally emerge through long-term values and cultural influences, which emphasise the universality of intrinsic motivation. This comparison reveals that the reliance of latent altruism theory on external triggers may overlook the consistency of these behaviours in the absence of situational stimuli (Schott et al., 2019).
The activation of latent altruism depends heavily on contextual and individual factors, including perception and attention. Research demonstrates that situational urgency or adherence to social norms, interact with personal neural mechanisms to influence latent altruistic behaviour. This variability demonstrates that the activation of latent altruism is not universal but highly dependent on external influences and personal characteristics (Hu et al., 2023).
Cultural norms significantly affect how latent altruism is expressed and activated. Experimental studies reveal that individuals in collectivist cultures, which emphasize group cohesion and mutual support exhibit stronger activated altruistic tendencies compared to those in individualist cultures. Latent altruism is activated depending on the alignment of social values with contextual triggers, underscoring the diversity of altruistic behaviours across cultural settings (van Dijk & De Dreu, 2020).
Despite the potential of empathy, it does not consistently activate latent altruism under all conditions. The influence of empathy on altruistic behaviours depends on age and cognitive complexity. In middle childhood, the cognitive demands of understanding social dynamics and evaluating moral dilemmas can interfere with spontaneous altruistic impulses, resulting in suppressed latent altruism. Empathy's role as a trigger for altruistic behaviour varies based on the interaction between cognitive processes and situational factors (Rose et al.,2024).
A global study across 150 countries shows that women in high-income nations are more likely to exhibit altruistic behaviours compared to their counterparts in low-income countries. This disparity suggests that latent altruism is influenced by the stability and resources provided by socioeconomic conditions, which create a conducive environment for altruistic tendencies to emerge (Knowles et al., 2023).
Additionally, gendered patterns in altruistic behaviours reveal that women prioritise caregiving-oriented causes, whereas men often respond to high-risk, high-impact campaigns. These differences underscore how economic disparities intersect with gender norms to influence the activation of latent altruism, emphasising the complex interplay between external conditions and individual tendencies (Lilley & Slonim, 2016).
Anālayo, B., & Dhammadinnā, B. (2021). From Compassion to Self-Compassion: a Text-Historical Perspective. Mindfulness, 12, 1350–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01575-4
Anders, S., Malzoni, M., & An, H. (2023). Altruism and anti-anthropocentrism shape individual choice intentions for pro-environmental and ethical meat credence attributes. PLOS ONE, 18(11), e0294531–e0294531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294531
Andersson, O., Miettinen, T., Hytönen, K., Johannesson, M., & Stephan, U. (2016). Subliminal influence on generosity. Experimental Economics, 20(3), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-016-9498-8
Constantino, S. M., Sparkman, G., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Bicchieri, C., Centola, D., Shell-Duncan, B., Vogt, S., & Weber, E. U. (2022). Scaling Up Change: A Critical Review and Practical Guide to Harnessing Social Norms for Climate Action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 23(2), 50–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006221105279
Dezecache, G. (2015). Human collective reactions to threat. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1344
Engelen, B., Thomas, A., Archer, A., & van de Ven, N. (2018). Exemplars and nudges: Combining two strategies for moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 47(3), 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1396966
Frisch, J. U., Häusser, J. A., & Mojzisch, A. (2015). The Trier Social Stress Test as a paradigm to study how people respond to threat in social interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00014
Guéguen, N., Bougeard-Delfosse, C., & Jacob, C. (2015). The Positive Effect of the Mere Presence of a Religious Symbol on Compliance With an Organ Donation Request. Social Marketing Quarterly, 21(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500415582070
Haucke, M., Golde, S., Saft, S., Hellweg, R., Liu, S., & Heinzel, S. (2022). The effects of momentary loneliness and COVID-19 stressors on hypothalamic–pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis functioning: A lockdown stage changes the association between loneliness and salivary cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 145, 105894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105894
Hill, C. A., Suzuki, S., Polania, R., Moisa, M., O’Doherty, J. P., & Ruff, C. C. (2017). A causal account of the brain network computations underlying strategic social behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 20(8), 1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4602
Hu, J., Konovalov, A., & Ruff, C. C. (2023). A unified neural account of contextual and individual differences in altruism. ELife (Cambridge), 12. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.80667
Kay, T., Lehmann, L., & Keller, L. (2019). Kin selection and altruism. Current Biology, 29(11), R438–R442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.067
Knowles, S., Peeters, R., Smith, M., & Wesselbaum, D. (2023). Who behaves charitably? Evidence from a global study. Applied Economics, 56(57), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2288063
Lachowicz, K., & Donaghey, J. (2021). Mutual aid versus volunteerism: Autonomous PPE production in the Covid-19 pandemic crisis. Capital & Class, 46(3), 030981682110576. https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168211057686
Lilley, M., & Slonim, R. (2016). Gender Differences in Altruism: Responses to a Natural Disaster. Papers.ssrn.com. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2716598
Maslow, A. H. (1943). Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory. United States, from paper" A Theory of Human Motivation" in the journal Psychological Review.” Retrieved September, 10, 2021.
Mould, O., Cole, J., Badger, A., & Brown, P. (2022). Solidarity, not charity: Learning the lessons of the COVID ‐19 pandemic to reconceptualise the radicality of mutual aid. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12553
Park, J., Chae, H., & Choi, J. N. (2017). The need for status as a hidden motive of knowledge-sharing behavior: An application of costly signaling theory. Human Performance, 30(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1263636
Pfattheicher, S., Nielsen, Y. A., & Thielmann, I. (2021). Prosocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts and definitions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.021
Reimers, L., Kappo, E., Stadler, L., Yaqubi, M., & Diekhof, E. K. (2019). Endogenous testosterone correlates with parochial altruism in relation to costly punishment in different social settings. PeerJ, 7, e7537. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7537
Rose, L., Kovarski, K., Caetta, F., Makowski, D., & Chokron, S. (2024). Beyond empathy: Cognitive capabilities increase or curb altruism in middle childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 239, 105810–105810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105810
Schott, C., Neumann, O., Baertschi, M., & Ritz, A. (2019). Public Service Motivation, Prosocial Motivation and Altruism: Towards Disentanglement and Conceptual Clarity. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(14), 1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1588302
Scott, M., & Unsworth, J. (2020). Lessons From Other Disciplines About Communication, Human Performance and Situational Awareness While Wearing Personal Protective Equipment. SAGE Open Nursing, 6, 237796082096376. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960820963766
Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13(5), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5%3C389::aid-per361%3E3.0.co;2-a
Suzuki, Y., & Miah, M. D. (2016). Altruism, reciprocity and Islamic equity finance. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 9(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-09-2014-0091
Tusche, A., & Bas, L. M. (2021). Neurocomputational models of altruistic decision‐making and social motives: Advances, pitfalls, and future directions. WIREs Cognitive Science, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1571
Van den Berghe, P. (1987). The ethnic phenomenon. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Chicago
van Dijk, E., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2020). Experimental Games and Social Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081420-110718
Wald, D. M., Johnston, E. W., Wellman, N., & Harlow, J. (2021). How Does Personalization in News Stories Influence Intentions to Help With Drought? Assessing the Influence of State Empathy and Its Antecedents. Frontiers in Communication, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.588978
Wu, T., & Han, S. (2021). Neural mechanisms of modulations of empathy and altruism by beliefs of others’ pain. ELife, 10. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.66043
Xu, Y., Li, W., & Chi, S. (2021). Altruism, Environmental Concerns, and Pro-environmental Behaviors of Urban Residents: A Case Study in a Typical Chinese City. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643759
Zheng, C., Liu, N., Luo, C., & Wang, L. (2021). Effects of the severity of collective threats on people’s donation intention. Psychology & Marketing, 38(9), 1426–1439. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21536
.jpg)
