User:Matibraps/Jean Wilkins/Misshaifa Peer Review

Hello! You can find my peer review below. I'm Grece Haddad Reviewing Mathilde Barakat Article.

• The Lead Section: Jean Wilkins is well introduced in the lead section. It summarized his career and areas of expertise effectively, leaving the reader with clear content and a good image of what's about to come next. However, consider resolving the ambiguity between “former” and “serving as a full professor as of 2024.” Stating his past and present role in one sentence would provide readers with a precise understanding. Overall, the lead reflects the most important information and clearly states what the article is about.
• The structure: The article's structure is logically organized, following Wilkins' career path in an organized format with sections on his biography, honors and recognition, and selected books and articles. However, the headings and the subheadings could be formatted more efficiently. The Biography section could be renamed instead divided into two headings following this structure: 1. Early life and education (combines early life and education and fellowships in one paragraph) 2. Career 2.1 CHU Sainte Justine 2.2 Professorship 3. Honours and recognitions 4. Selected books and articles 4.1 Books 4.2 Articles This structure would give the reader a clear and coherent outline of Wilkins' professional journey, making it easier to follow the progression of his career and contributions. Additionally, consider combining sentences into cohesive paragraphs rather than having each sentence on a separate line. This would make the text visually easier to read, enhancing the flow and positively impacting the storytelling.
• The coverage: This article effectively covers Wilkins' achievements in the medical field, especially in the adolescent field. Each section’s length appropriately reflects its importance to the subject, and there are no unnecessary or off-topic sections. The sources are well-balanced throughout the article and it summarizes all of them into one coherent article.
• Neutral content: The article is generally neutral and avoids promotional language, but a few adjustments could improve its balance. While it highlights Dr. Wilkins' achievements and educational background, it seems a bit overrepresented. It lacks detailed information about his research studies and key discoveries. Including examples of his significant studies and contributions would help readers understand why he earned such recognition. Be sure to present this information in a neutral, factual tone to maintain objectivity and avoid sounding promotional. Also, mentioning some challenges he faced could make the article more neutral and could make a clear reflection on the topic.
• The sources: The article relies on reliable sources from trusted medical and educational institutions, as well as textbooks and journal articles, reinforcing the credibility of the doctor. Each reference is appropriately linked, and every sentence corresponds to a source. Overall, this section effectively supports the article's quality and integrity. Mathilde, you did a great job. Best of luck with the publication process! Mathilde, you did a great job. Best of luck with the publication process!