This is a WP physiological page

A boy was on his computer. He was a new user to wikipedia, yet he somehow knew quite a lot about wikipedia and editing. He was a good user, always fighting vandalism and helping pages. However, today he experienced the loss of a friend to an armed Buddhist robber. He suddenly went on wikipedia and deleted everything on Buddhaism and replaced it with "I hate buddhists and they suck". The boy was then blocked indefinatly, and never came back to help wikipedia.

This just goes to show that Wikipedia Administrators must first consider why certain actions were taken, such as unnecessary comments toward Buddhism. Blocking Admins must keep in mind that pages can easily be reverted. Admins must realize 1. Why did this good, upstanding user do this? then 2. Take into account that this was a good, upstanding user, and make decisions based on that. Then, finally, 3. Administer a block according to the exact given circumstances. This was just one of the many guidelines for blocking, but i hope it helps. 7Deadly Sins ^{greed, gluttony, and wrath}_{envy, sloth, lust and pride}

Here is another version of the story, with another meaning of CRAZY:

A young girl was a Beaurocrat on Wikipedia. She had received many, many awards for being such a good Beaurocrat, and helping wikipedia so much. So, she decided to, one day, delete files and replace them with words she heard her mommy saying. She then protected the page so noone could edit it and revert it back. She deleted 59 whole pages of wikipedia, and when asked what had she done, she replied " Im so sorry, i didnt know any better. Please forgive me". She wasnt even blocked.

The moral of the story? Another form of WP:CRAZY is when a block is refused simply because the fact that a user is in high standing. Quite the opposite of the above story. However, if sufficient evidence is provided to make a block, do not stop at anything to block that user for doing what they did. If this guideline is followed, then wikipedia will be a stricter place.