User:Elizahs/African Women's Development Fund/Wikipedian10,123 Peer Review

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

Elizahs

Link to draft you're reviewing

User:Elizahs/African Women's Development Fund

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

User:Elizahs/African Women's Development Fund

Evaluate the drafted changes

Lead

Guiding questions:

• The Lead has been updated to reflect the new content added by my peer.
• The Lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
• The Lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections.
• The Lead includes information that is not present in the article.
• The Lead is concise without being overly detailed.

Content

Guiding questions:

• The content added is relevant to the topic.
• The content added is up-to-date.
• There is no content that is missing or content that does not belong.
• The article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. It addresses topics related to Women in Africa and some parts of the Middle East.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• The content added is neutral.
• There are no claims in the article that appear heavily biased toward any particular position.
• None of the viewpoints are overrepresented, or underrepresented.
• The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
• The content in the article accurately reflects what the cited sources say.
• The sources are thorough, and they reflect the available literature on the topic.
• The sources are current.
• The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors, and they include historically marginalized individuals.
• Other sources are available, but the article provides the best and most scholarly sources.
• All of the links work.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• The content added is well-written, concise, clear, and easy to read.
• The content added does not have any grammatical or spelling errors.
• The content added is well-organized and broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
• Are images well-captioned?
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• The content added has improved the overall quality of the article.
• The strengths of the content added are that it adds more information regarding the history and work of the organization in the article.
• The content added can be improved with more information about the organization's work, history, and funding.