User:Atsme/ACE2021
 | These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
Top five features to look for in a candidate
- Do they have the time to devote? An arb who doesn't take the time to read the diffs in context are doing a disservice to the accused as well as to the project.
- Do they have the proper demeanor? Mannerism and attitude are extremely important. Yes, we are all human, but arbitrators are supposed to be a cut above the rest, and should be held to a much higher standard.
- Have they demonstrated good ethics, critical thinking skills, and good ole common sense?
- Has the candidate demonstrated bias or favoritism? It is extremely important for arbs to be neutral.
- Do they have a mind of their own, and are capable of separating themselves from groupthink?
- See Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/2021 review/Consultation as it is a big part of what is driving my position for this election.
Alphabetical candidate summary
[edit]| Candidate | My thoughts | My position |
|---|---|---|
| Banedon (talk · contribs) (nom) | After reading User_talk:Banedon#Arbitration problems, I thought we had a non-admin who would make a good candidate. Many of us already know the current system doesn't work as well as it should. DS/AE needs a facelift, and Banedon appears to have the moxy needed to help make it happen. What he doesn't have is the experience as an administrator who knows full well the problems with DS/AE/irreversible unilateral actions at sole discretion, and what all is involved when an editor has to appeal an action. |  Neutral
|
| Beeblebrox (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | Currently serving on the committee, but I cannot overlook the fact that we did not get the changes so many of us had hoped for relative to the very problematic DS/AE/hard to reverse unilateral actions. Update:17:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC) I've had second thoughts after careful consideration, and hope others will agree that my choices will result in a highly productive ArbCom. |  Support
|
| Cabayi (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | Has all the makings to be a good arb, as well as the background experience working at WP:NPP, which is definitely a plus. At the very least, he would bring fresh ideas to the table. |
Support
|
| Donald Albury (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | Another good choice, and much needed new blood to ArbCom. Update:04:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC) this candidate is a long standing veteran editor/admin, so he's not exactly "new blood" aside from being new to ArbCom itself. His response to my DS/AE question made me indecisive enough to change from support to a ?. I'm studying the situation, and don't want to make a final decision based on a single Q&A. | 
|
| Enterprisey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | Absolutely! I do believe that Enterprisey will prove enterprising as a member of ArbCom, and has my full support. | Support
|
| Guerillero (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | I believe WP needs changes that only ArbCom can implement, especially as it applies to DS/AE. With that in mind, I'm hoping we can elect a team of arbitrators who can work well together, and are on the same page in that regard. I do respect Guerillero, but we differ in some of the areas that need change. | Neutral
|
| Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | More new blood...in the positive sense. Update: 22:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Liked his responses to the questions. | Support
|
| Opabinia regalis (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | I have supported Opabinia regalis in the past and appreciate her expertise, experience and humor. I think ArbCom needs her straight-up common sense input. Update 15:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC) |
Support
|
| Thryduulf (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | I like Thryduulf - he does what he sincerely believes is the right thing to do - but we have far too many differences in multiple areas that I feel are pressing issues right now. I'm of the mind that WP needs some serious changes, including implementing a level of decorum at ANI/AN and several modifications to DS/AE as I've mentioned in the past. | Neutral
|
| Worm That Turned (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | We really need a little more daring and less go-with-the-flow if we ever hope to fix what needs fixing on WP. I had hoped that our picks last year would have implemented some of those much needed changes by now, but it looks like our search isn't over. I think WTT is neutral enough to fit the bill, so I'm ok with giving him another shot at it. | Support
|
| Wugapodes (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (nom) | He is definitely a doer but |
Support
|
Results
[edit]See the results here. Atsme 💬 📧 22:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)