User:11JORN/Archive 14

Dónde Están los Ladrones?

Are you intending to work on Dónde Están los Ladrones? Because if you are, I can help since I plenty of Spanish-language sources that would be helpful. Erick (talk) 02:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

@Magiciandude: Hey! Yes I am pretty interested on expanding this article. Your help will be welcome. Alex ^talk 02:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Cool! I have access to HighBeam so I can send you articles from there. And if you like, I can also give you links from articles on your sandbox if you don't mind me editing the sandbox. Erick (talk) 02:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

No problem, you can post the links here (I know it's a mess, but it's the only one I have by now, hahah). Alex ^talk 02:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

It's fine. I helped WikiRedactor with Pies Descalzos and Fijacion Oral 1, so this one should be pretty easy, hopefully. :P Erick (talk) 02:51, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

@Magiciandude: Can you send me an E-mail again? I received the notification but I wasn't able to open it because I was using my old E-mail here. :/ Alex ^talk 03:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Try it now. If it doesn't work, the message is basically saying that I have an article or two from Highbeam that I would like to share with you, but I need your e-mail. Erick (talk) 03:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

OK, I received and replied to it. Alex ^talk 03:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Yep, got it! I've sent you an article from HighBeam as promised. Erick (talk) 03:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

@Magiciandude: Yeah I saw it. Thanks so much for your help! Alex ^talk 03:51, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Sure thing! I'm heading to the Resource Request to get to some reviews because finding Latin music reviews (especially in the '90s) can be really hard to find online. :( Erick (talk) 04:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

@Magiciandude: Oh, thank you once again!! Alex ^talk 04:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Yo! I just wanted to make sure that you received the e-mail I sent you that contains an article from El Informador. Erick (talk) 17:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

@Magiciandude: Yes I have. Thank you! Alex ^talk 01:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

I sent another e-mail with articles from the sources I requested at WP:RX. I just want know if you received them as well. Erick (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

@Magiciandude: Actually I lost all my e-mails :( Could you send me them back please? Alex ^talk 08:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Can do. Erick (talk) 18:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

I've sent the e-mails just now. Let me know if anything comes up. Cheers! Erick (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

@Magiciandude: Thank you! Sorry for the delay, so many things are happening in my personal life so I was't able to fully concentrate on Wiki. Alex ^talk 05:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All Is Full of Love

The article All Is Full of Love you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:All Is Full of Love for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All Is Full of Love

The article All Is Full of Love you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:All Is Full of Love for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

All Is Full of Love

I've just seen it has passed as a Good Article. Good job! Sorry I didn't pop up and help with during the review. Glad to see all the effort I put on that article paid off. Thank you!

P.S. I'm currently awaiting a review for Post, let's hope that goes well also! --Bleff (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The 7-27 Tour poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The 7-27 Tour poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Not.com.mercial

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Not.com.mercial you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 19:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Not.com.mercial

The article Not.com.mercial you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Not.com.mercial for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 23:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Carina Dahl - Hot Child.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carina Dahl - Hot Child.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bjork - Where is the Line.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bjork - Where is the Line.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Janet anytime cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janet anytime cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Janet Jackson - Control cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janet Jackson - Control cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Janet Jackson - When I Think Of You.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janet Jackson - When I Think Of You.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Janet Jackson - So Excited.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janet Jackson - So Excited.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Living Proof (Cher album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Living Proof (Cher album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 02:01, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Living Proof (Cher album)

The article Living Proof (Cher album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Living Proof (Cher album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Living Proof (Cher album)

The article Living Proof (Cher album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Living Proof (Cher album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:21, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Lift Me Up (Geri Halliwell song)

Please don't change Australian peaks lower than 50 to a single or album chart template, as australian-charts.com does not archive peaks below 50. Ss 112 06:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

ok Alex ^talk 06:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)