This template is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Well, you are wrong, the navboxes are to navigate between articles, NOT to highlight multiple topics covered in a single article. If the software was notable enough, it would have its own article, and if the section on the software is in an entirely different article not already listed in the navbox, then linking to that article section is fine. however, i am now really tired of the silliness around Tor, so i wont bother to edit any more. others can try to sort out whats happening. Im sure whatever is worked out will be fine, i am not going to worry about it any more. thanks for your passion in trying to document this stuff, sorry i dont agree based on my understanding of policy.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not looking to make Template:Tor hidden services redundant, but it seems like some of the things that links to would be more appropriate here (or also appropriate): .onion, for example. List of Tor hidden services (the article) seems to also make sense to include somewhere but it doesn't quite fit in either of the existing sections. --— Rhododendritestalk | 21:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]