Template talk:New South Wales Representatives
Appearance
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Colours
[edit]Using text on background colours like this is generally not a good idea from an accessibility point of view. In this case, I don't think it looks good even without considering readability. JPD (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is surely better for readability than having (ALP) or (LIB) after every single name? I agree that it doesn't look fabulous but I certainly think it looks better than having abbreviations after every name. Frickeg 00:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Colours might be less intrusive than abbreviations in one sense, but they can reduce the reader's ability to make out the text in the first place. What about something like the format in {{Constituencies in London}}? JPD (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think JPD's idea is much better. That is the standard way of segmenting templated lists on Wikipedia. Remy B 00:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- That is a good idea. Frickeg 21:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think JPD's idea is much better. That is the standard way of segmenting templated lists on Wikipedia. Remy B 00:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Colours might be less intrusive than abbreviations in one sense, but they can reduce the reader's ability to make out the text in the first place. What about something like the format in {{Constituencies in London}}? JPD (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Template-Class Australia pages
- NA-importance Australia pages
- Template-Class New South Wales pages
- NA-importance New South Wales pages
- WikiProject New South Wales articles
- Template-Class Australian politics pages
- NA-importance Australian politics pages
- WikiProject Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australia articles