Template talk:Melbourne-rail-transport-stub
Appearance
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Different image put back in
[edit]Because (apparently) the Metlink logo is not allowed, I've put my X'Trap icon in this - needs to have some sort of icon. If anyone has a better image somewhere, feel free to use that. --Evan C (Talk) 04:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hang on, why can't the Metlink logo be used? Doesn't it come under fair use as a logo for a corporation? I personally think the Metlink logo is more apporiate for the stations than the picture of the Xtraopolis train (even though I love it when one pulls up at the station!) simply because Metlink is the network in which the stations lie on. Lakeyboy 10:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, apparently it's not fair use - just going by what Ed g2s has said. Anyhood - Metlink isn't the rail network anyway, no more than Connex, that is. Metlink is the umbrella organisation for all of Melbourne's PT.
Do we need a seperate Melbourne and Victoria stub?
[edit]Do we need a stub for both Melbourne (this one) and the one for all of Victoria (Template:VictoriaAU-rail-transport-stub)? -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 10:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Template-Class Australia pages
- NA-importance Australia pages
- Template-Class Melbourne pages
- NA-importance Melbourne pages
- WikiProject Melbourne articles
- Template-Class Australian Transport pages
- NA-importance Australian Transport pages
- WikiProject Australian Transport articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Template-Class rail transport pages
- NA-importance rail transport pages
- All WikiProject Trains pages