Template talk:Japanese swords

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Japanese

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Japan: Military history / Sport

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:53, December 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

This redirect is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

This redirect is supported by the Sport task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Martial arts

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts

Other?

A spear and a glaive seem somewhat out of place in a template titled "... swords." It may not be wise to begin a slippery slope of non-swords on this sword template. Bradford44 (talk) 04:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and removed the naginata and yari from the template. It doesn't make any more sense to include Japanese weapons that aren't swords in this "Japanese swords" template than it would to include swords that aren't Japanese. In my opinion, the naginata and yari are as out of place in this template as a rapier or claymore would be. Bradford44 (talk) 03:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are considered swords due to how they are made. Please go read the Japanese swords article. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 05:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that these are the only two exceptions I would make. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 05:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the sakabatō, be added, amongst "Fictional swords"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.225.28.143 (talk) 00:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Order?

Are the entries in the template ordered somehow? If yes, how? (apparently not alphabetically) bamse (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's any particular order at the moment. Kirill ^{[talk] [prof]} 00:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? ;-) bamse (talk) 08:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To be quite honest, because I'm not sure what the right order would be. Doing it alphabetically would be easy, but strikes me as a bit simplistic. I'd prefer something based on chronological development or some other meaningful subcategorization, but nothing obvious comes to mind. Kirill ^{[talk] [prof]} 12:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Chronological order sounds good, but it might be difficult to know when some of the older weapons were developed. Any time of order would be preferable to the present random arrangement in my opinion. Besides alphabetical order one could think of ordering by length (nagasa). Not sure what to do with shinken in this case, though... bamse (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]