Template talk:GAR link

Implementation

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment has two different formats (individual and community). Should I set the template to default to one or the other? Or use it as a dab for two different templates? Or set up a flag that lets the template do both? Not sure of the best way to implement this (and I have to admit I don't see the point in why the two formats use different locations) czar ♔ 20:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I'd default to community and go with a "|individual=y" flag, since it's lesser-used of the two (I think), though we get so little GAR traffic that I suspect people will forget about it and just skip the template, like I did this time. --Pres N 03:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]