This template is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
@Spinningspark: I don't know. The practise of bolding and italicizing based on number of casualty is ongoing for years and are done in previous disasters in India templates. I just followed what is being done for years. Asking at WT:INB might give you some answers. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 09:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be the "norm" in all of these Indian disaster templates back to like 2009, but it seems like a case of everyone presuming consensus and duplicating the template. It looks like the first one created was Template:Disasters in India in 2014 in February 2014 by Quartzd. A nav box is a navigational tool and is not meant to convey information of its own, and this is not a proper use of italics or boldface. The footer keys should also be removed ("Incidents resulting in more than 50 deaths are in italics Deadliest incident is in bold") The layout is also a bit odd in that it is ordered by date but in a format we mostly see in lists, like 2019.— TAnthonyTalk19:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]