Template talk:COVID-19 pandemic data/Netherlands medical cases chart
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject COVID-19
[edit]I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, --Another Believer (Talk) 18:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Excessive data on the chart
[edit]The change in deaths should either be absolute or relative as having both bloats the chart (this is not a spreadsheet) and breaks the lines on mobile. I'll wait until a decision is made to convert the chart to the newest standard ('data' parameter). Alexiscoutinho (talk) 04:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- I agree, and I think it only makes sense to simply show the relative change in deaths, just like the number of cases. If anyone wants the absolute change, those can be found in the table. FlippyElectricitySocket (talk) 12:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Discrepancy data RIVM - Hopkins
[edit]Since mid March there is a discrepancy between Wikipedia and Hopkins for total number of cases in the Netherlands. Since end of July the deviation increases.
date;wikipedia;hopkins;deviation
2020-02-25;0;0;0
2020-03-03;24;24;0
2020-03-10;382;382;0
2020-03-17;1705;1711;6
2020-03-24;5560;5580;20
2020-03-31;12595;12667;72
2020-04-02;14697;14788;91
2020-04-09;21762;21903;141
2020-04-16;29214;29383;169
2020-04-23;35729;35921;192
2020-05-05;41087;41286;199
2020-05-12;42984;43183;199
2020-05-19;44249;44449;200
2020-05-26;45578;45780;202
2020-06-02;46647;46852;205
2020-06-09;47903;48109;206
2020-06-16;49087;49295;208
2020-06-23;49722;49930;208
2020-06-30;50273;50483;210
2020-07-07;50694;50907;213
2020-07-14;51146;51362;216
2020-07-21;52073;52307;234
2020-07-28;53374;53647;273
2020-08-04;55955;56279;324
2020-08-11;59973;60391;418
2020-08-18;63973;65560;1587
2020-08-25;67543;69683;2140
2020-09-01;71129;73802;2673
2020-09-08;76548;79792;3244; — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwappa (talk • contribs) 06:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
2020-09-15;84778;88763;3985
2020-09-22;98240;102844;4604; Uwappa (talk) 07:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
2020-09-29;117566;122620;5054; Uwappa (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
2020-10-06;144999;150413;5414; Uwappa (talk) 06:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
2020-10-13;188876;194591;5715; Uwappa (talk) 08:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Hopkins numbers extracted from https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html -> NL -> chart Cumulative Cases
The Dutch RIVM should be reliable and is now the source for Wikipedia. Hopkins should be reliable too. So there should not be a deviation, certainly not one that increases rapidly.
The deviation is now too high to be the result of a later sampling time on same day as RIVM.
What should be the source for Wikipedia, RIVM or Hopkins?
- Template-Class COVID-19 pages
- NA-importance COVID-19 pages
- WikiProject COVID-19 articles
- Template-Class Disaster management pages
- NA-importance Disaster management pages
- Template-Class medicine pages
- NA-importance medicine pages
- Template-Class pulmonology pages
- NA-importance pulmonology pages
- Pulmonology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Template-Class Netherlands pages
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- Template-Class virus pages
- NA-importance virus pages
- WikiProject Viruses articles