Template talk:Al-Qaeda and direct affiliates

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
	This redirect is supported by the Terrorism task force.

I would argue that the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and East Turkestan Movement are supporters of Al-Qaeda at best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.72.98.47 (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason that the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front, a secular, ethno-nationalist organisation, should be included as a supporter of Al Qaeda. Pmolloy291 (talk) 01:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of this template?

This template is rife with problems. What differentiates a "major supporter" from a "supporter?" How does a nation make the list of "opposers?" Too many of the names mentioned cannot be possibly verified. I propose a deletion/merge of this template to Template:Al-Qaeda. Any franchises can be placed on that one.--RDavi404 (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name of template

"Franchises"? What, is al-Qaeda suddenly in the restaurant business? The word "franchise" has such a strong connection to commercial activities that it is inappropriate for this infobox. These organisations aren't selling anything but jihad. The name of this template should be changed. I propose "Direct affiliates of al-Qaeda", but if others have their own ideas, feel free to propose them below. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as how the original creator of the template was indefinitely blocked for incompetence, including an exceedingly poor grasp of the English language, I have gone ahead and moved it myself. If anyone objects, please provide substantial reasoning. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 15:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]