This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
With Beistline assuming senior status, that means we only have two judges in the entire history of this court who did not serve as chief judge. While the content of this template may be consistent with that of counterpart templates, how is it of benefit to OUR COVERAGE OF THIS COURT to limit the template to chief judges when there is so little difference between that list and the list of all judges? RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 05:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
