Template:FGAN
Failed "good article" nomination
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of December 23, 2024, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?:
Pass - 2. Verifiable?: Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Stable?: Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.
 | This template should always be substituted (i.e., use {{subst:FGAN}}). |
Usage summary
[edit]All fields are optional.
{{subst:FGAN
|well written =
|accuracy =
|thorough =
|NPOV =
|stable =
|images =
|closing comments = <!-- OPTIONAL -->
}}— ~~~~
Note
[edit] | This template employs intricate features of template syntax.
You are encouraged to familiarise yourself with its setup and parser functions before editing the template. If your edit causes unexpected problems, please undo it quickly, as this template may appear on a large number of pages. You can conduct experiments, and should test all major changes, in either this template's sandbox, the general template sandbox, or your user space before changing anything here. |