Template:Did you know nominations/Walter Freudenthal
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:04, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Walter Freudenthal
[edit]... that Freudenthal of Wroclaw distinguished Keratoma senile from Verruca senilis, before leaving Nazi-occupied Europe?Freudenthal characterized, for the first time, Keratoma senile (solar keratosis, actinic keratosis) histopathologically and distinguished it from Verruca senilis (seborrheic keratosis).[1]- ALT1:
... that Walter Freudenthal defined actinic keratosis?
- ALT1:
- Reviewed: Vijay Shastri
Created by Whispyhistory (talk). Self-nominated at 19:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC).
Interesting life, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. When and by whom was he known as Freudenthal of Wroclaw? Striking the ALT because some unknown Latin thing will probably not raise enough curiosity. Consider mentioning "dermatologist", for the original, or it will be distinguishing one unknown thing (could be a mushroom) from another. In the article, can we something about three red links called notable? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that dermatologist Walter Freudenthal distinguished Keratoma senile from Verruca senilis, before leaving Nazi-occupied Europe?
- ALT3: ... that Walter Freudenthal distinguished the skin conditions Keratoma senile from Verruca senilis, before leaving Nazi-occupied Europe?
- Thank you @Gerda Arendt:. Alternate hooks above. I'll try and blue link the reds soon. Many books and journals just call him Freudenthal of Wroclaw, (colleagues in the field), but doesn't say anywhere where it originated from. I've altered it in article to clarify. Whispyhistory (talk) 04:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. I believe that he was called FoW in books and journals, but don't think that happened before he worked in England, therefore find the improved hooks possibly historically wrong, talking about him before. Needs rewording, or using his real name, perhaps explaining "became known as". As readers probably don't know either name, why not real? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- sure, changed to real name to avoid confusion. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:07, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- , prefer ALT2 -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerda Arendt (talk • contribs) 06:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- sure, changed to real name to avoid confusion. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:07, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. I believe that he was called FoW in books and journals, but don't think that happened before he worked in England, therefore find the improved hooks possibly historically wrong, talking about him before. Needs rewording, or using his real name, perhaps explaining "became known as". As readers probably don't know either name, why not real? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)