The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Royiswariiitalk 09:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Overall: Article is new enough and long enough. AGF on offline sources (I don't even have snippet view for the hook fact). No close paraphrasing found. Article is neutral, well sourced. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)