Template:Did you know nominations/Oliver Toussaint Jackson

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Oliver Toussaint Jackson

(

)

... that in 1910 Oliver Toussaint Jackson established the agricultural settlement Dearfield, Colorado, for black Americans? Source: A year later, Jackson's agricultural settlement for black Americans, named Dearfield, was officially established, attracting settlers from Denver, Minneapolis, and Kansas City. [1]

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Streamlined Ocean Liner

Created by TheGracefulSlick (talk). Self-nominated at 23:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC).

reviewing Whispyhistory (talk) 06:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: concise article, enjoyed reading the story and the link to Dearfield. Whispyhistory (talk) 15:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

The article is not cited. There is an issue in trying to add content from the article as the source. I did get a valid citation though. If you are unsure what I am asking for, please feel free to ping me. You can also see my current DYK for an example. Or, the reviewer of this DKY where I fixed their source. Thanks! dawnleelynn^(talk) 22:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

dawnleelynn if I understood you correctly, I think I addressed your concern.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Done @TheGracefulSlick: Yes, that is perfectly what was needed in the article. It also needed copied into the proper place in the template, which I have done for you. See after the hook in the template, also view it in edit mode. In future, if you do more DYKs, you'll need to add the supporting article content and the citation after the hook in the template. Marking it done again. Thank you. dawnleelynn^(talk) 23:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Additional comment. I was mistakenly under the impression that one needed to add the bit that I added to the hook in the template. The source text and citation URL. However, further reviewing led me to this comment in a new, unused template. "Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)". I concur with the template that it is strongly advised and helps the reviewer, but it is not a requirement. I will also add that the reviewer must still be able to verify in the article that the source content is present, distinctly supports the hook, and is cited by the source with an inline citation. However, the edit I asked you to make in the article still needed to be done, so this was not an unneeded change. I have just done my first QPQ today, so I'm learning too. All is well. dawnleelynn^(talk) 03:59, 23 March 2018 (UTC)