Template:Did you know nominations/Naruto
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Naruto
[edit]... that Masashi Kishimoto first developed Naruto in 1997 but re-did the concept in 1999? Source: "The 45-page Naruto "pilot" first ran in the Summer 1997 issue of Akamaru Jump, a Shonen Jump spinoff that runs during three annual holiday breaks in Japan. Shueisha approved a revamped version for the main Weekly Shonen Jump magazine in 1999." [1]
ALT 1 ...that the anime version of the manga series Naruto was separated into two parts? Source: "The sequel series takes place two and a half years after the first Naruto anime series as the older, somewhat more mature title character returns to his village of Konoha and faces the Akatsuki criminal ninja organization." [2]ALT 2 ...that Masashi Kishimoto waited until Part II of the manga Naruto to focus on romance? Source: Kishimoto, Masashi (2005). NARUTO―ナルト―[秘伝・闘の書]. Shueisha. pp. 310–311. ISBN 4-08-873734-2.- ALT 3 ...that Masashi Kishimoto has a five step process for drawing the characters for the manga Naruto? Source: Kishimoto, Masashi (2007). Uzumaki: the Art of Naruto. Viz Media. pp. 112–114. ISBN 1-4215-1407-9.
Improved to Good Article status by 1989 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC).
- A recent good article, hook is sourced. No close paraphrasing or neutrality detected. My only concern is that the hooks are not necessarily "hooky" as the reviewing guide would put it. It seems relatively common for something to redone over the years and for an anime to be split into two parts. I would think that would be a more interesting fact that can be pulled from the article that is more unique for this topic. Aoba47 (talk) 20:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
@1989: ALT3 seems the most appropriate to me. I have struck out ALT2 and slightly tweaked ALT3. Everything looks good to go on my end. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)