Template:Did you know nominations/NUDE
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
NUDE
[edit]- ... that NUDE is a film about a talent search that was inspired by Pirelli Calendars of the 1970s?
Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self-nominated at 20:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC).
TonyTheTiger, QPQ needed. Otherwise new, in time, long enough, sourced, inline hook citation checks out, neutral any no apparent copyvios. Earwig shows that a chunk of text from the "Cast" section is taken directly from the website, but this is a list where rewriting would accomplish little, and it is cited with both an inline attribution and an inline citation. --Usernameunique (talk) 02:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Can I get credit for participation in the review of Template:Did you know nominations/Tawhai Hill, Kānuka Hills, Pūkio Stream? I have been actively involved and my involvement (Leading to the creation of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tawhai Hill) has changed the direction of the discussion.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- No, I'm afraid not. You did not do a full review, and that is what is required. Please provide a QPQ that is a full review. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Reviewing: Template:Did you know nominations/Immigration Museum of the State of São Paulo 1st of 2 QPQs.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Can we get this approved so that I can make a date request for October 29.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
TonyTheTiger, approving based on the QPQ provided, as it is almost complete. However, you still need to check that the hook facts of that QPQ check out with inline citations. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
