Template:Did you know nominations/Mass Incidents in China
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mass incidents in China
- ... that respected author on Asian Affairs Thomas Lum states that China possesses "one of the highest levels of income inequality in Asia" leading to a growth in number of mass incidents?
- ALT1 "... that income inequality is considered one of the major reasons for mass incidents in China? Source: Association between low income, depression, self-efficacy and mass-incident-related strains: an understanding of mass incidents in China
- ALT2"... that Ministry of Public Security of China states that mass incidents in the country are the most "direct, broadest, and deepest real dangers" affecting social stability? Source:Comprehensive Research Report on China's Current Issue of Mass Incidents Caused by Conflicts Among the People
- Reviewed: Campanha da Legalidade
- Comment: This is an abandoned nomination made by @Steggy1, which I have adopted. I made some changes in citations, rephrased ALT1 and added ALT2, both with sources; and also did a QPQ. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
5x expanded by Steggy1 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC).
Full review needed. This was a student nomination from a class that ended in May without the nomination being transcluded (the final step in the nomination process); the nomination has been adopted by Kavyansh.Singh after a request on the DYK talk page. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- ALT1 looks interesting to me and is inline cited in the article. Dyk-check passes. QPQ has been provided. No copyright concerns. Prose is readable. However there are few things uncited in the article, please address these first before I approve this. ─ ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @TheAafi – Thanks for reviewing this. I have added some citations, and almost every 1-2 lines in the article is supported by it. I hope that the nomination can be approved. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Kavyansh.Singh:, That's really nice work. I've highlighted three places in the article with cn tag, where I feel citations are necessary. See if those can be incorporated with other text, reworded, removed or cited, whatever. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 07:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @TheAafi – I have made the changes. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
