Template:Did you know nominations/Lee Hyo-jae

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Lee Hyo-jae

(

)

... that social activist Lee Hyo-jae's efforts helped abolish South Korea’s patriarchal naming system, allowing people to use two surnames? Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/14/world/asia/lee-hyo-jae-dead.html
- ALT1:... that social activist Lee Hyo-jae's efforts helped abolish South Korea’s patriarchal naming system, allowing people to use both parents' surnames? Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/14/world/asia/lee-hyo-jae-dead.html

Created by Ktin (talk). Self-nominated at 20:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC).

starting review Mujinga (talk) 22:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
Other problems: - not cited to sentence, see below

QPQ: None required.

Overall: interesting article, interesting hooks which I'll AGF on since i don't have access to paywalled link. as wikipedia is a global website, i prefer ALT1 since it is a bit clearer, ~~although "two" can be removed, "both" covers it. also the relevant sentence in the article needs to be directly cited for this claim.~~ it seems the nominator has 3 previous DYKs, therefore no QPQ required Mujinga (talk) 22:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

@Mujinga:, Thanks for the review. Made a minor edit on the article -- please see if this works. Ktin (talk) 22:50, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ktin: thanks for the fast answer, the edit helps but you still need to put the citation on that sentence per "Each fact in the hook must be supported in the article by at least one inline citation to a reliable source, appearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact" and also i asked for "two" to be removed from ALT1 Mujinga (talk) 22:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

@Mujinga:, Thanks much. Done on both. It was a grammatical typo earlier -- thanks for the catch. Agree that ALT1 reads better.Ktin (talk)

well that went fast, thanks Ktin for the responses, then i can pass this as good to go for both hooks, noting that i prefer ALT1 as it's a bit clearer on the parents. all the best Mujinga (talk) 23:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)