Template:Did you know nominations/J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vanamonde (Talk) 10:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia
- ...
that J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia has suffered from insufficient copy editing?Source: http://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/tolkien_studies/v004/4.1wickham-crowley.html- ALT1:... that the J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia was published before the copy editing process was completed? Source: http://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/tolkien_studies/v004/4.1wickham-crowley.html
- Reviewed: Kogin-zashi
5x expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 10:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC).
New enough and long enough (expanded from 470 to 3,793 characters on November 18), neutral with due weight given to negative/mixed reviews, sources cited with inline citations although more of the quotes would be well served by the inclusion of a citation at the end of the direct quote (although it's never unclear whose quote is being referred to so I don't hold it against this nomination). No problematic copyvio material found, with the bot only flagging direct quotes. As phrased, the first hook expresses an unattributed opinion and so I struck it. The second hook restates an attributed fact which is present in its source (ref 1) and is amply short and broadly interesting. QPQ done and no image to worry about. Looks ready to go! —Collint c 23:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
