Template:Did you know nominations/Hassan Ahmed (Ghanaian diplomat)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Hassan Ahmed (Ghanaian diplomat)
[edit]- ... that former Ghanaian and United Nations diplomat Hassan Ahmed is Director of Protocol for the President of Ghana? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that after serving as Ghana's ambassador to Iran, Cuba and Denmark Hassan Ahmed is now Director of Protocol for the President of Ghana? Source: [2]
- ALT2:... that after working for 34 years as a Ghanaian diplomat, Hassan Ahmed, became the Head of Office of a UN-AU hybrid mission in Sudan? Source: [3] and this [4]
Created by Crosstemplejay (talk). Self-nominated at 11:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, well sourced.There is no copy violation or close paraphrasing, but the first hook and ALT2 have not been cited by reliable references at the article.Also the two final sentences of working life is not cited. We will choose the best hook If the citation problem of the hooks is removed.Saff V. (talk) 11:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
@Saff V.: Thanks for the review. I have sorted out the references stuff. Please go through and make your recommendation. God bless.CrossTemple Jay 09:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- It looks better now by citing reference on the last sentences of working life, Thanks. In other hand, I try explain clearly the inline references of hooks. He is the current Director of Protocol for Nana Akufo-Addo, President of Ghana, this sentence is part of first hook and placed at lead but there is any references at the end of sentence in the artcle, Please add! Another one is about third hook, it consists of two sentences at the article in different places: He was employed at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ghana and worked there for 34 years and The position was with the United Nations-African Union Hybrid Operation in Darfur, Khartoum, Sudan, where was appointed the Head of Office, which first one ( He was employed ...) doesn't have any sources and the main problem is relation between two sentences. If you put these sentences next to each other, we will accept the third hook, because at this situation make more sense! Am I clear? Regards!Saff V. (talk) 13:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Saff V.: Thanks for the review. I gave only one ref because I believed it covered the whole hook. I have added another one and included a ref at the lead of the article. God bless. Again if you deem fit to modify any of the hooks, you can please do so. CrossTemple Jay 09:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
The reference problem is removed! Good to go by ALT1!
- @Saff V.: Thanks for the review. I gave only one ref because I believed it covered the whole hook. I have added another one and included a ref at the lead of the article. God bless. Again if you deem fit to modify any of the hooks, you can please do so. CrossTemple Jay 09:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- It looks better now by citing reference on the last sentences of working life, Thanks. In other hand, I try explain clearly the inline references of hooks. He is the current Director of Protocol for Nana Akufo-Addo, President of Ghana, this sentence is part of first hook and placed at lead but there is any references at the end of sentence in the artcle, Please add! Another one is about third hook, it consists of two sentences at the article in different places: He was employed at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ghana and worked there for 34 years and The position was with the United Nations-African Union Hybrid Operation in Darfur, Khartoum, Sudan, where was appointed the Head of Office, which first one ( He was employed ...) doesn't have any sources and the main problem is relation between two sentences. If you put these sentences next to each other, we will accept the third hook, because at this situation make more sense! Am I clear? Regards!Saff V. (talk) 13:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
