Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/GD 61

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 20:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

GD 61

[edit]
(
)

Created by Mercurywoodrose (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 02:06, 14 October 2013 (UTC).

  • The article has only 845 prose characters; is it going to expanded more? Chris857 (talk) 02:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Crap, I didn't do my maths very well - give me a couple of days and will expand. Gotta do some RL stuff right now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
  • OK then,
  • at 1670 characters prose
  • recently, newly written
  • Cited inline to reputable sources
  • Image is PD NASA/ESA
  • Hook is brief, and verified, and interesting to me
  • QPQ satisfied
  • Issues and suggestions (may not all be critical to passing):
  • The EL points at a NASA shutdown notice; do you know the intended URL (since the shutdown is over)?
I ditched it as I don't think it will add more than the sources Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I'd a like a source on the detection sentence, and preferably that section merged into the other paragraphs, or better sectioning employed
I am not sure about it -will read and sprinkle through the prose Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  • A pass over ref formatting would be appreciated (I took a stab already), but for example, is that how SIMBAD is usually cited?
I was lazy or rushed for time (one of the two) - fixed now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Chris857 (talk) 03:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
This source (already in article) mentions that it was observed using Hubble. Also, do you want to mention that the report about water appeared in Science? Anyway, I see no blockers to this passing (and these two are just suggestions). Chris857 (talk) 22:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
added the hubble bit - not sure that adding Science is necessary. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Alright, all my concerns are addressed. Chris857 (talk) 14:57, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/GD_61&oldid=1022569551"