The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 15:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Like for what? Point out what you want to have changed? I have made some slight adaption and hope to have addressed your concerns.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Indeed. I've copyedited the lead and the first section of the article. Hope it looks a little better now. BorgQueen (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
I'd like another reviewer, as I'm too involved now. @Theleekycauldron: Can you take a look? BorgQueen (talk) 06:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi BorgQueen. Thank you very much for the CEs, some nice prose and phrases you added to the article the – looks really good. I also quickly revised and saw the several wls you made but was not sure if some of the words actually appear in the sources I had used. For the Middle Earth, CGI or loincloth I couldn't confirm it appears in the Guardian source. But I'll go through it and see if I find something in another article. But also if not does not appear in the source you are probably right it can just not be related to the trials over the sources used in the article.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
@Paradise Chronicle: You're right actually. I was only focusing on the prose and forgetting about the sources lol. Will be adding them one by one. BorgQueen (talk) 08:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)