Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Double Down (book)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 09:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Double Down (book)

[edit]

Created by Muboshgu (talk). Self nominated at 15:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC).

  • article is new enough and long enough. The hook is supported by the reference and the other facts in the article are supported by inline references. Valenciano (talk) 22:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
  • The hook is 235 characters (224 without "pictured"), which is far above the 200 maximum allowed for DYK (and hooks should be shorter than that, usually). I've struck the hook; please come up with an ALT that is a valid length. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Oops, forgot to count. How's this? I believe "pictured" doesn't count to the 200? – Muboshgu (talk) 18:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
  • ALT1 hook is 191 characters—excluding "(pictured)"—so it's a valid length, and has inline source citations. The rest of the approval per Valenciano's original review. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)