Template:Did you know nominations/Blephilia hirsuta
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 23:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Blephilia hirsuta
[edit]- ... that the hairy wood mint is endangered in the state of Massachusetts?
- Reviewed: Malkhei Yisrael Street
- Comment: might be a better hook. Thought this one as a short sharp statement didn't sound too bad....
Created/expanded by Seanryan002 (talk), Botanyclass (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 12:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'll review this. Before I do, here's a suggestion: ALT1 ... that 30-to-120-centimetre (12 to 47 in) tall hairy pagodas can be found throughout eastern North America? Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hook: The original is fairly dull. Do you think my alt is misrepresentative?
- Article: New and long enough. Referencing is thorough. No images. Paraphrasing needs to be touched up per this. These [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DBlephilia_hirsuta%26oldid%3D465290604&url2=plants.usda.gov%2Fjava%2Fprofile%3Fsymbol%3DBLHI&minwords=4&minchars=13 two look okay. Also, "unfortunately" is a judgement call (i.e. not NPOV). AGF on the books, which I can't seem to access.
- Summary: Paraphrasing needs to be improved, with a bit of NPOV-ing. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:37, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- I found a bunch of these articles as part of an education/biology project and figured DYK was a good way to introduce collaborative editing. Will look at and distance wording from sourcing. I like the hook and think it is close enough to factuality to not be misrepresentative. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- As an update, I agree on changing the first one and did so. The others are tricky in that some words such as "several whorls" have a very specific meaning and I can't think of another way to express them offhand. Will look at some other sources. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:19, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I can't think of one either. Many of the others have specific meanings in biology. I think this is good to go now (not as many issues as most student projects, thankfully) Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)